1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
6 ways pressure groups support democracy
Competing groups = no elite groups and wide dispersal of power
Promote debate
Educate public
Improve decision-making
Often internally democratic
May be seen to supplement electoral democracy or have replaced it as a way to represent views and interests
3 ways pressure groups hinder democracy
Power is concentrated in the hands of very few groups
Groups are unequal in terms of wealth and power
Often undermine democratic process by being unaccountable
Representation of groups
Ensure groups not represented in typical politics are represented (e.g. low-income children, Rashford)
Use of communication methods
Access to mass media and use new technology like the internet to change the political agenda and mobilise different groups
Unaccountability
Often ‘stalk the corridors of power’ and are not accountable to the public or the media
Lobbying Act of 2014 also didn’t increase transparency
Think tank funding is severely lacking
Leaders of PG
Rarely elected, and TU leaders often elected on very low turnouts
Direct action
Holds the country to ransom
Operating outside of established legal and constitutional framework → operating outside and against the democratic process
Increasing political inequality
Groups often empower already powerful as those who have money, expertise and links to gov’t are the most powerful
Groups that are excluded from both press groups and electoral democracy
Homeless people, asylum people, children, prisoners
Because difficult to organise and have to rely on others to protect them
Chequebook membership
Signing up to orgs like NT is more about membership benefits than campaign objectives
Slacktivism
Online engagement superficial
3 examples of rival groups that ensure a balance of power
Tobacco lobby influential before 1997 but was crushed by Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
Business power countered by trade unions
Fossil fuel corps countered by environmental movement