1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Two factors → decline in value of private property
Public policy shocks: rent control, nationalizations
Low savings and depressed asset prices
Fiscal innovations → durable deconcentration of wealth
Progressive income tax
Progressive inheritance/estate tax
Progressive annual tax on net wealth/capital
Neopropertarianism
is the ideology that treats private property as sacred and nearly unlimited
transparency problem
financial transparency: an automatic exchange of bank information and a global register of financial assets, so wealth can actually be seen and taxed
American primacy in education
The US pioneered mass education
NOW college access depends heavily on parental income/education now reinforces inequality
History shows it's possible to have what 3 economic factors and economic growth
High progressive taxation
Lower inequality and a compressed wealth distribution
A large social state (public spending on education, health, and pensions)
neoliberalism
as the presumption that markets are efficient and
government ruins things
how does neoliberalism work in the economy
not self-correcting
Inequality becomes political inequality
A "free market" is a myth, because government always sets the rules: property,
monopoly, contracts, bankruptcy, and enforcement
Co-management: pros
challenges sacralized property, gives workers a role in long-term strategy lowers wage inequality and executive pay, and does not hurt productivity
Co-management: cons
Shareholders keep the casting vote, so workers' power is capped
only applies to large firms
doesnt change wealth concentration
It is national only, so it does nothing about global tax competition
reduces value of owners assets
piketty's solution
participatory socialism: keep 50% of seats for workers, cap any
single large shareholder's voting power, and add progressive wealth taxes so ownership
becomes temporary and circulates