HISTORY: MORLEY MINTO REFORMS/INDIAN COUNCILS ACT

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

4 Terms

1
New cards

What were the reforms? what did they state?

The morely minto reforms were drafted by Lord Minto and Jhon Morely to calm the Hindu’s down after the sadweshi movement and to win Muslim support.

It stated:

  • Enlargement of Councils: The size of the Imperial (Central) Legislative Council increased from 16 to 60 members, and provincial councils were also expanded (e.g., to 50 members in Bengal, Madras, and Bombay).

  • Separate Electorates: Muslims were granted the right to elect their own representatives through exclusive Muslim-only voter lists, fulfilling the demand made by the Simla Deputation in 1906.

  • Indian Representation on Executive Councils: Satyendra Prasad Sinha became the first Indian appointed to the Viceroy’s Executive Council as a law member, and Indians were also added to the Secretary of State’s Council in London.

  • Expanded Legislative Powers: Elected members gained the ability to ask supplementary questions, move resolutions on the budget, and discuss matters of public interest, though real executive power remained firmly in British hands


2
New cards

Importance of the reforms?

  • Allowed Indians a voice in government

  • Separate Electorates for Muslims


3
New cards

Why did INC reject the Morely-Minto reforms

  • Lack of actual power

  • Did not comply with the Indian idea of self rule

  • It introduced Muslim Electorates, arguing they would divide the Indian nation along religious lines

  • Accused it of being another “divide and rule plot”


4
New cards

Why were the reforms important for Muslims? pros and cons

Positive Reactions (Why Muslims Welcomed the Reforms)

  • Acceptance of Separate Electorates. The British officially granted Muslims the right to elect their own representatives in separate constituencies. This fulfilled the primary demand made by the Simla Deputation (1906) and the All-India Muslim League.

  • Protection from Hindu Majority. Muslims felt secure knowing their political voice would not be drowned out by the larger Hindu population in joint elections. They no longer had to rely on Hindu voters to get elected to legislative councils.

  • Recognition as a Distinct Community. The reforms legally recognized Muslims as an important, separate political community in India rather than just a religious minority. This boosted Muslim political confidence and validated the formation of the Muslim League.

  • Weightage in Councils. Muslims were granted more seats in the councils than their pure population percentage warranted, giving them stronger political representation.

Reservations and Concerns (Why Some Felt It Was Limited)

  • Advisory Role Only. Like Congress, Muslim leaders realized that the expanded councils only allowed members to debate and advise, while real executive power remained firmly with the British Viceroy and Governors.

  • Lack of Self-Government. The reforms did not grant any meaningful self-rule, meaning Muslims still had very limited influence over actual government policies and administration.

  • Rising Tensions with Congress. Because Congress fiercely opposed the separate electorates, the reforms initially widened the political divide between Hindus and Muslims, leading to communal friction in the years immediately following 1909.