Forensic Science Legal Standards and Evidence Comparison

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/31

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering legal foundations, courtroom procedures, standards organizations, and evidence comparison types in forensic science.

Last updated 11:11 PM on 10/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

32 Terms

1
New cards

Confrontation Clause

A 6th Amendment constitutional right relevant to forensic testimony and evidence examination.

2
New cards

Crawford v. Washington (2004)

A Confrontation Clause case involving the admissibility of a tape recording.

3
New cards

Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009)

A Supreme Court case ruling that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial under the Confrontation Clause.

4
New cards

Brady v. Maryland (1963)

A Supreme Court case establishing that the prosecution must disclose new, potentially exculpatory evidence.

5
New cards

United States v. Bagley (1985)

A case addressing prosecution disclosure duties, noted for evidence that "didn't say much."

6
New cards

Kyles v. Whitley (1995)

A Supreme Court ruling affirming that the prosecutor has an affirmative duty to disclose favorable evidence.

7
New cards

Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) (1975)

Codified rules of evidence enacted in 1975 governing relevance, exceptions, exclusions, and expert testimony under Rule 702.

8
New cards

Rule 702

A Federal Rule of Evidence governing expert witnesses, serving as quality control of analysis and opinion.

9
New cards

National Academy of Sciences (NAS)

A scientific institution established in 1863.

10
New cards

OSAC (Organization of Scientific Area Committees)

An organization formed under NIST in 2014 to develop and strengthen forensic science consensus standards.

11
New cards

Examiners speaking for evidence

The role of forensic examiners to associate, exclude, or identify evidence.

12
New cards

American Bar Association

The organization that sets ethical rules and professional standards for attorneys in the US.

13
New cards

Adversarial System

A legal system used in the US, Canada, Australia, UK, Ireland, and New Zealand where the police work with the prosecutor's office and opposing sides present their cases.

14
New cards

Inquisitorial System

A legal system with no set criteria for admissibility, usually no objections, and where most testimony is submitted as a written report (which can also occur in adversarial systems if both sides stipulate).

15
New cards

Examining Magistrate

A judicial official in an inquisitorial system who is responsible for deciding what evidence is examined.

16
New cards

Brady Violation

Occurs when the prosecution fails to turn over evidence that could impeach a witness or favor the defense.

17
New cards

Certification

A professional credential awarded to an individual forensic practitioner.

18
New cards

Accreditation

A formal recognition awarded to an organization or laboratory demonstrating technical competence.

19
New cards

ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)

An organization founded in 1898 that develops voluntary consensus standards.

20
New cards

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

A federal agency founded in 1901 that promotes measurement science, standards, and technology.

21
New cards

ANSI (American National Standards Institute)

Founded in 1918; serves as the United States representative to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

22
New cards

ISO (International Organization for Standardization)

An international standard-setting body established in 1947; notable in forensics for standard ISO 21043.

23
New cards

ASCLD-LAB

American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board, founded in 1973; merged with ANAB and bases standards on ISO 17025.

24
New cards

ANAB

ANSI National Accreditation Board, which merged with ASCLD-LAB.

25
New cards

NIJ / TWG

Technical Working Groups organized by the National Institute of Justice.

26
New cards

NIJ / SWG

Scientific Working Groups organized by the National Institute of Justice.

27
New cards

Court Trial Rates

97%97\% of cases do not go to trial; only 2%2\% go to court overall, and 3%3\% in Ohio.

28
New cards

Identification (Comparison Type)

Matching an unknown substance against a known standard in a database (e.g., drug chemistry).

29
New cards

Comparison (Comparison Type)

Comparing material recovered from a crime scene with material from a known source (e.g., paint).

30
New cards

Classification (Comparison Type)

Comparing known evidence against a reference collection to determine class (e.g., deer hair).

31
New cards

Individualization (Comparison Type)

Demonstrating that an item from an unknown source originates from a single unique source (e.g., fingerprint).

32
New cards

Bayesian Approach

A probabilistic framework using likelihood ratios to update beliefs, calculated as: prior odds×likelihood ratio=posterior odds\text{prior odds} \times \text{likelihood ratio} = \text{posterior odds}.