MGMT 402 Exam II Review: Contract Law, Behavioral Ethics & Corporate Governance

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering contract formation, defenses, consideration, Statute of Frauds, third-party rights, behavioral ethics concepts, and core corporate governance case studies.

36 Terms

1
New cards

Offer

A manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, made so as to justify another person in understanding that their assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.

2
New cards

Objective Intent Standard

The legal standard judging offers by how an objective, reasonable person would interpret the manifestation, rather than by subjective intent; excludes statements made in anger, jest, or undue excitement.

3
New cards

Advertisements (Contract Law)

Generally treated as invitations to negotiate rather than binding offers, unless they are highly specific, definitive, and leave nothing open to negotiation.

4
New cards

Auction With Reserve

The default auction format where the seller invites bids as offers and retains the legal right to withdraw the item at any time before the hammer falls.

5
New cards

Auction Without Reserve

An auction format where the seller explicitly offers the item for sale, cannot withdraw it once bidding commences, and is legally obligated to sell to the highest bidder.

6
New cards

Option Contract

An irrevocable offer created when an offeree gives paid consideration to the offeror to keep the offer open for a specified duration.

7
New cards

Rejection

An express or implied refusal of an offer by the offeree that becomes effective upon receipt and permanently terminates the offeree's power of acceptance.

8
New cards

Counteroffer

A rejection of the original offer coupled with a simultaneous new offer, which completely extinguishes the original offer.

9
New cards

Termination by Operation of Law (Offers)

The termination of an offer caused by the lapse of a specified or reasonable time, the death or incapacity of either party, the destruction of the specific subject matter, or subsequent illegality.

10
New cards

Mirror-Image Rule

A common law rule requiring an offeree's acceptance to match the exact terms of the offer without modification or addition; any variation operates as a counteroffer.

11
New cards

Mailbox Rule

A contract rule providing that acceptance is effective upon dispatch (when properly addressed and sent), whereas revocations, rejections, and counteroffers are effective only upon receipt.

12
New cards

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

A false statement of material fact made with scienter (intent to deceive) that induces justifiable reliance by an innocent party, resulting in injury or damages.

13
New cards

Duress

Unlawful force, physical threats, or wrongful economic coercion that deprives a party of their free will and forces them to enter into a contract.

14
New cards

Undue Influence

The unfair taking of advantage by one party in a position of trust, dominance, or confidential relationship to overpower another party's free choices.

15
New cards

Unconscionability

A defense against the enforcement of a contract that is so grossly one-sided and unfair that it shocks the conscience; includes procedural (bargaining power disparities) and substantive (oppressive terms) aspects.

16
New cards

Consideration

Something of legally sufficient value given in exchange for a promise, established through a bargained-for exchange to differentiate contracts from gratuitous promises or gifts.

17
New cards

Preexisting Duty Rule

A principle stating that a promise to perform an act one is already legally or contractually obligated to perform does not constitute valid consideration.

18
New cards

Illusory Promise

A statement where the promisor retains total freedom to perform or refrain from performing without actual legal obligation, rendering it unenforceable for lack of consideration.

19
New cards

Promissory Estoppel (Detrimental Reliance)

An equitable exception to the consideration requirement where a clear promise is reasonably relied upon by the promisee to their substantial detriment, making enforcement necessary to avoid injustice.

20
New cards

Statute of Frauds (MYLEGS)

Statutory rules requiring signed writings for contracts involving Marriage, agreements not performable within one Year, Land interests, Executor debts, sale of Goods priced at $500\$500 or more, and Suretyship.

21
New cards

Parol Evidence Rule

A legal rule preventing courts from admitting prior or contemporaneous oral or written statements that contradict, alter, or add to the terms of a fully integrated written agreement.

22
New cards

Disaffirmance

The legal power of a minor to void and cancel an entered contract anytime during minority or within a reasonable time after reaching age 1818, requiring the return of remaining property in exchange for a full refund.

23
New cards

Intended Beneficiary

A third party for whose direct benefit a contract was created (such as a creditor or donee beneficiary) who acquires legal rights to sue on the agreement once rights have vested.

24
New cards

Incidental Beneficiary

A third party who benefits indirectly from the performance of a contract without being the intended recipient, possessing no legal standing to sue or enforce the agreement.

25
New cards

American Rule (Successive Assignments)

The majority rule for successive assignments of the same contractual rights, establishing that the first assignee in time wins.

26
New cards

English Rule (Successive Assignments)

The minority rule for successive assignments of the same contractual rights, establishing that the first assignee to provide written notice to the obligor wins.

27
New cards

Novation

A three-party agreement that completely extinguishes the original contractual obligation by substituting a new party for an original party and releasing that original party with mutual consent.

28
New cards

Fundamental Attribution Error

The human tendency to attribute other people's unethical actions or mistakes to their internal character flaws while attributing one's own unethical choices or errors to external situational pressures.

29
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance

The psychological discomfort felt when holding conflicting beliefs or when behavior contradicts personal moral values, commonly resolved by rationalizing the unethical behavior rather than changing it.

30
New cards

Conflicts of Interest

Circumstances where personal interests, potential financial gain, or competing loyalties conflict with professional duties, undermining objective judgment and incentivizing corruption.

31
New cards

Coggins v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.

A legal dispute where controlling shareholder Billy Sullivan executed a freeze-out merger to eliminate minority owners solely to pay off $5.3M\$5.3\text{M} in personal debts, breaching fiduciary duty without a legitimate corporate purpose.

32
New cards

Wells Fargo Sales Culture Scandal

A corporate ethics scandal where employees created over 3.5 million3.5\text{ million} fraudulent accounts between 20022002 and 20162016 due to perverse performance quotas ('Eight is Great') and pervasive fear of termination.

33
New cards

Tylenol Cyanide Crisis (1982)

A corporate ethics benchmark where Johnson & Johnson responded to 77 Chicago deaths by pulling 31 million31\text{ million} bottles ($100M+\$100\text{M}+ value), issuing public warnings, and introducing tamper-evident packaging.

34
New cards

Texas Two-Step Bankruptcy Strategy

A legal and corporate maneuvering tactic utilized by Johnson & Johnson to shift talc-related asbestos liabilities into a spinoff entity to file for bankruptcy and evade tort litigation.

35
New cards

Volkswagen (VW) Clean Diesel Scandal (2015)

An institutional fraud case where VW installed secret defeat devices in 11M11\text{M} diesel vehicles to fool EPA tests while emitting pollutants up to 40 times40\text{ times} legal limits, resulting in over $30B+\$30\text{B}+ in penalties.

36
New cards

Theranos Blood-Testing Fraud

A criminal fraud case in which CEO Elizabeth Holmes falsely claimed the proprietary Edison machine could perform hundreds of tests on a drop of blood, while secretly utilizing third-party commercial equipment.