1/91
Topic 1 Full
What is Sales Puffery ? (with example)
Harmless, exaggerated ad claims that can’t be measured, that shoppers don’t usually rely on .
(e.g. Red Bull gives you wings)
Why is sales puffery generally allowed ?
Consumers aren’t expected to take exaggerated claims literally
What is a “mere puff” ?
A statement courts see as harmless exaggeration rather than a legally binding promise.
Which famous case recognised the concept of “mere puff”?
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893)
Explain “Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893)” case → (3)
Ad promised £100 to anyone that uses its product and still catches a flu
Mrs Carlill used it correctly but caught the flue, company refuse to pay her.
Court ruled in favour of Mrs Carlill.
Difference between Sales Puffery & False Statement (2)
Puffery → Harmless exaggeration
False Statement → Inaccurate claim that may create legal liability
Why was Red Bull sued ?
Plaintiff claimed false advertising because he drank it for years yet never grew wings.
What was the real issue in the Red Bull case?
Red Bull was accused of misleading advertising because its slogan and marketing suggested the drink provided superior performance, and energy benefits that were not scientifically proven.
How did the Red Bull case end?
Red Bull settled out of court with $13M - not just to the plaintiff, no winner or loser was legally declared.
What is a contract?
Legally binding agreement enforceable by law.
Where do Irish contract rules originate?
Based on English law, & developed through case law dating back to the 17th century
What is meant by a "meeting of minds"?
The court sees that both parties genuinely agreed to the contract
Can marketing promotions create contracts?
Yes, marketing promotions can create binding contracts, sometimes unexpectedly
Essential elements of a contract? (3) - In order
Agreement (Offer + Acceptance)
Consideration
Intention to Contract
What happens when a contract is breached ?
The injured party may seeks legal action for breach of contract.
Are advertisements generally considered contractual offers?
No.
They are usually invitations to treat rather than offers.
What is an invitation to treat?
An invitation to negotiate rather than a legally binding offer.
When can an advertisement become a contractual offer? (4)
When its
definite,
precise,
clear, and
capable of acceptance.
What type of marketing statement is most legally dangerous?
A clear, unconditional and precise statement capable of acceptance by customers.
What product was involved in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball?
The Carbolic Smoke Ball.
What did the company promise?
£100 to anyone who used the product and still contracted influenza
What defence did “Carbolic Smoke Ball” use?
The ad was "mere puff" and not a contractual offer.
Why is the Carlill case important? (3)
It established that advertisements can create binding contracts when they are sufficiently, clear and definite.
What was the “AAirpass” and how much did the customer pay for it? (2)
A lifetime unlimited first-class travel pass sold by American Airlines.
$250,000
Why did American Airlines cancel his pass?
They alleged fraudulent use, including fake companion names and excessive unused reservations.
Who won the case?
American Airlines.
What legal lesson comes from the case?
Contractual rights can be lost if contractual terms are breached.
Why is the Hoover promotion famous?
It is often described as the worst sales promotion in history.
What was Hoover's original promotion?
Buy a Hoover product costing over £100 and receive two free flights in Europe.
Why did the first Hoover promotion succeed?
The claim process was difficult, so few customers redeemed the flights.
What change was made on Hoover’s promotion in 1992?
The promotion expanded to include free transatlantic flights to Orlando or New York.
What happened after Hoover tried to avoid honouring the offer?
Customers formed a pressure group and legal proceedings followed.
What was the eventual cost?
Hoover's parent company was ordered to pay approximately £50 million.
What happened to Hoover's reputation? (3)
Market share collapsed,
executives were fired, and
the brand suffered severe reputational damage.
What marketing lesson comes from Carlill and Hoover?
Avoid making clear offers capable of acceptance by large numbers of consumers.
How can marketers reduce legal risk during advertising?
Use puffery and terms like "subject to availability" to limit offers and avoid misleading consumers.
What are damages?
Monetary compensation to put the injured party back where they would have been if the contract was carried out
What is specific performance?
A court order requiring a party to carry out contractual obligations
What is rescission?
Returning both parties to their original positions.
What does "costs follow the event" mean?
The loser pays legal costs.
Difference between “Contract” & “Tort” ?
Contract → Agreement between parties
Tort → Duties imposed by law
What is a representation?
A statement that persuades someone to make a contract, but it’s not part of the contract itself
What is fraudulent misrepresentation?
A knowingly false statement or one made recklessly (didn’t care if it was true or not) that causes another person loss.
Elements of fraudulent misrepresentation? (4)
False statement of fact
Made knowingly false/recklessly
Relied upon (Believed)
Loss suffered
What case established the test for fraudulent misrepresentation?
Derry v Peek (1889)
Explain the “Derry v Peek (1889)” case (6)
A tramway company (Derry) wanted to replace horse-drawn trams with steam-powered trams.
The company directors stated they had the right to use steam-powered trams, but government approval was still pending.
An investor (Henry Peek) bought shares based on this claim.
The government later denied permission to use steam-trams - project didn’t go through despite prior investment
Peek lost money, sues directors for misrepresentation.
Court ruled in favour of the directors because they genuinely believed the government would grant permission. They didn’t deliberately lied or acted recklessly.
What remedies are available for misrepresentation? (2)
Damages
Rescission
What is negligent misrepresentation?
A false statement a speaker thought was true, but without good reason
Case example of negligent misrepresentation?
Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964).
Explain the ‘Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964)’ case. (6)
An advertising agency (Hedley Byrne) wanted to a company’s financial reliance, before deciding to work with them.
Hedley Byrne asked its own bank to obtain the company’s financial reference.
Their bank contacted Heller - a bank with prior relationship with the company Hedley wants to work with.
Heller provided a positive reference, but added a disclaimer saying it accepted no legal responsibility for the reference.
Hedley relied on the reference, worked with said company, lost money, then sued Heller for negligent misrepresentation.
Court ruled in favour of Heller.
What relationship usually exists in negligent misrepresentation?
One party relies on the skill or knowledge of another.
Another case example of misrepresentation
Spice Girls v Aprilia (2000)
Explain the "‘Spice Girls v Aprilia (2000)’ case (7)
Spice Girls agreed to promote a motor scooters company (Aprilia)
Aprilia signed the contract assuming all 5 members will be together for the entirety of the campaign
Prior to contract, one member told both the girls and their management that she was considering to leave the group, none of which informed Aprilia.
All 5 girls participated in promo activities, creating the impression they would all remain together throughout.
Later, the girl leaves the group leaving only 4, thereby affecting Aprilia’s promotional plans.
Aprilia sues the Spice Girls’ company for misrepresentation.
Court rules in favour of Aprilia.
Defamation
A false statement that damages another person's reputation.
How can defamation arise in marketing? (4)
By speaking negatively about competitors, products, services or individuals.
What legislation governs defamation in Ireland? (2)
Defamation Act 2009
Defamation (Amendment) Act 2026
Who can sue for defamation? (2)
Living persons, and
Companies
Publication
Communication of the statement to at least one third party.
What forms can defamatory statements take? (5)
Written,
Spoken,
Digital,
Pictures or
Gestures.
What is the name of the act that prohibits the posting of fake reviews or paying others to post fake reviews?
Consumer Rights Act 2022
What must a defamatory statement do?
Injures a person’s reputation in most reasonable people’s eyes
What is identification
People can tell the statement is about the plaintiff.
What are the main defences? (5)
Truth
Honest opinion
Privilege
Fair and reasonable publication on a public-interest matter
Innocent publication
How can a defamation dispute be resolved? (2)
Apology
Offer of amends
What remedies exist for defamation? (3)
Damages
Injunction
Complaint to regulator / Ombudsman
When is an online review NOT defamation? (2)
Genuine honest opinion,
Factual claim
When might an online review become defamatory? (3)
What it’s
Malicious
Fake
Not genuinely believed by the writer
What does the Consumer Rights Act 2022 prohibit? (2)
Posting fake reviews
Paying others to post fake reviews
What must businesses do before publishing reviews?
Check if the reviewer actually bought or used the product.
Explain "mere conduit" defences
An online middle-man is usually not liable for other people’s harmful content, unless they’re informed and fail to remove it quickly.
What damages level is "moderate defamation"?
€0 → €50,000.
What damages level is "very serious defamation"?
€200,000 → €300,000
What is an AI hallucination?
When AI makes up totally false facts and presents them as reliable or true.
What is the key legal question concerning AI defamation?
Who is responsible for false statements made by AI ?
Name a case that highlights AI hallucination
Walters v OpenAI
Explain the ‘Walters v OpenAI’ case (4)
A journalist asked ChatGPT to summarise a legal complaint about fire-arm organisation
ChatGPT wrongfully accused Walters (a radio presenter / gun-rights activist) for embezzling money from the organisation, when he wasn’t even involved in the case.
Walters sued OpenAI for defamation
Court ruled in favour of OpenAI because a reasonable user wouldn’t treat chatbot responses as definitive fact given the fact AI is known for hallucination risks.
What change did the ‘Defamation (Amendement) Act 2026’ bring?
Got rid of juries for new defamation cases in the high court
For defamation cases involving companies, what is the “serious harm” test?
Businesses must prove it suffered major reputational harm before suing.
What is malicious falsehood?
Deliberately published false statement about a person’s business, trade, profession or property.
What do plaintiffs need to show to sue for malicious falsehood?
Must prove real, measurable financial losses (special damages)
Does malicious falsehood apply to opinions?
No
What is comparative advertising
Advertising that points out a competitor (or their products / services) either directly or indirectly.
What is “Knocking copy"
Comparative advertising that criticises competitors and may amount to sales puffery
What law governs comparative advertising? (2)
Directive 2006/114/EC
European Communities (Misleading and Comparative Marketing Communications) Regulations 2007.
When is comparative advertising prohibited? (5)
If misleading
Doesn’t compare like-for-like products / services (e.g. cheap basic phone vs. high-end laptop)
Can’t be verified
Denigrates (bad-mouths) competitors
Creates confusion between the advertiser’s and competitor’s goods or services.
when may a competitor's logo be used for comparative advertising?
Only when necessary, provided it doesn’t offer an unfair advantage of, or denigrate the competitor.
NOTE
Unfair advantage → in this context means, piggy backing on the competitors good brand rep.
What remedy is available against unlawful comparative advertising?
An injunction.
What does “An injunction” mean ?
An authoritative warning or order
Case example of comparative advertising (3)
Dunnes used Aldi's name and pricing with slogans like "Aldi Match".
Aldi argued Dunnes was misleading customers because some products were genuine equivalents.
Court ruled in favour of Aldi but only for some of the comparisons, as they were found to be misleading.
When are ‘price-only’ comparisons allowed
When they’re factually verifiable
What does the Supreme Court look for when given a case on comparative advertising
It checks whether consumers are comparing products fairly or are being deceived
What was the problem identified in Tesco's Aldi price-match campaign?
Some Tesco products had less of the main key ingredients than Aldi’s products, therefore the comparison wasn’t like-for-like.