1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Articles of Confederation (1781–1789)
Created a weak central government (no power to tax, regulate commerce, or enforce laws)
Successes: Land Ordinance of 1785 and Northwest Ordinance of 1787 (set rules for western settlement and statehood; banned slavery in the Northwest Territory)
Weaknesses: Economic chaos, interstate disputes, and inability to deal with Britain/Spain effectively
Shays’ Rebellion (1786–87)
Massachusetts farmers protested debt and taxes; exposed weakness of the Articles and need for a stronger central government
Major Compromises
Great Compromise
3/5 Compromise
Federalism
Great Compromise
Bicameral legislature (House based on population; Senate equal representation)
3/5 Compromise
Counted enslaved persons as 3/5 for representation and taxation
Federalism
Division of power between state and national governments
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
Federalists (Hamilton, Madison, Jay): Strong central government; wrote The Federalist Papers
Anti-Federalists (Henry, Mason): Feared tyranny; demanded a Bill of Rights
Ratification (1788) → Bill of Rights (1791)
added to protect individual liberties
George Washington (1789–1797)
Precedents
Hamilton’s Financial Plan
Whiskey Rebellion
Foreign Policy
Precedents:
Two terms, cabinet, neutrality in foreign affairs
Hamilton’s Financial Plan:
National bank, assumption of state debts, excise tax, tariffs
Controversy: Strict vs. loose interpretation of the Constitution
Whiskey Rebellion (1794):
Federal authority confirmed/supported
Foreign Policy
Neutrality Proclamation (1793), Jay’s Treaty (1795)
John Adams (1797–1801)
XYZ Affair
Alien and Sedition Acts
Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions
XYZ Affair (1797):
Quasi-War with France
-diplomatic incident between French and U.S diplomats that resulted in an undeclared and limited war.
-French demanded bribes but Americans Refused and left
Alien and Sedition Acts (1798):
Limited free speech; targeted immigrants
Thomas Jefferson
Election of 1800
Policies
Marbury v. Madison
Louisiana Purchase
Embargo Act
Election of 1800
“Revolution of 1800”—peaceful transfer of power from Federalists to Democratic-Republicans
Jefferson Policies:
Reduced federal power, military spending; kept national bank
Marbury v. Madison (1803):
Established judicial review
-Marshall
Louisiana Purchase (1803):
Doubled U.S. size; used loose construction to justify
-U.S buys land from France
Embargo Act (1807):
Cut off trade to avoid war → economic disaster, especially in New England
James Madison (1809-1817)
Causes of War of 1812
War of 1812
Battle of New Orlans and Hartford Convention
Treaty of Ghent
Causes of War of 1812:
British impressment(forcing into arms), trade restrictions, arming of Native Americans
War of 1812 (1812–1815):
Mixed success militarily; burned Washington, D.C.
Battle of New Orleans (1815): Andrew Jackson became hero
Hartford Convention (1814): Federalists opposed war; contributed to their decline
Treaty of Ghent (1814):
Restored prewar boundaries (status quo ante bellum)
-Ended war of 1812
Era of Good Feelings (1817-1825)
James Monroe
Monroe Doctrine
James Monroe(1817-1825)
One party rule
Nationalism and Economic Growth
Henry Clay’s American System
Panic of 1819
Missouri Compromise
One-party rule
Democratic Republicans
Nationalism and Economic Growth:
Henry Clay’s American System: Tariff of 1816 (protective), 2nd Bank of the U.S., internal improvements (roads, canals)
Panic of 1819:
Economic depression; resentment of the Bank of the U.S
Missouri Compromise (1820)
Missouri = slave state, Maine = free state
36°30′ line = future limit of slavery
Temporarily balanced sectional tensions
Monroe Doctrine 1823
Declared Western Hemisphere closed to further European colonization
U.S. would stay out of European affairs
Reflected nationalism and growing U.S. confidence
Enforcement relied on British naval power, though the U.S. took credit
Marshall Court
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v Ogden
McCulloch v. Maryland | 1819 |
Federal power over states; Bank is constitutional
Gibbons v. Ogden 1824
Federal government regulates interstate commerce