1/57
3.1 levels of communication
Group communication
interdependence of its members
a shared identity
the interaction between group members & the social structure of the group
Communication in group will be affected by the
characteristics of the group (types of groups, group prooperties)
the context (social norms)
the situation of its members (roles, status)
groups communication is defined
a process of communication that happens between one individual of the group & the members
Group communication

types of groups → groups by size
small groups
medium-size groups
big groups
small groups
max 12 members
direct communication & interaction between its members is “easy”
medium group
max 40
are good for discussions, colloquiums, expositions
big groups
more than 40
direct interaction between all members is very difficult
linked to public communication in which only one person (or few people) gets to communicate with most of the group
Advantages of big groups
more resources at their disposal to achieve group goals
enables manager to obtain division of labor advantages
Disadvantages of big groups
problem in communication & coordination
conflict
formal groups
a designated work group defined by the organisation structure
command groups
task groups
command group
a group composed of the individuals who report directly to a given manager
task groups
those working together to complete a job or a task
informal groups
neither formally structured nor organizationally determined
appears in response to the need for social contact
interest groups
friendship group
interest group
those working together to reach a specific objective with which each is concerned
friendship groups
those brought together because they share one or more common characteristics
cohesiveness
degree to which a group members are attracted to each other & are motivated to stay in the group
increasing cohesiveness
make the group smaller
encourage agreement with group goals
increase time members spend together
increase group status & admission difficulty
stimulate competition with other groups
give rewards to the group, not individuals
physically isolate the group
norms
acceptable standards of behaviour within a group that are shared by the group´s members
normalization
reciprocal influence between people who do not have a frame of reference in relation to a stimulus & do not have a prior judgement about it
when a norm is created
it can become the frame of reference for a group
makes the group different form other groups
norms constrain
individuals judgements & persist over time
they remain even when the original members have disappeared
Performance norms
centered on how hard a person should work in a given group
Appearance norms
which inform or guide us as about how we should look or what our physical appearance should be.
Social arrangement norms
centered on how we should act in social settings
Resource allocation norms
in a business environment (resource scheduling, pay, assignment of jobs, equipment...)
High cohesiveness + high performance norms
high productivity
High cohesiveness + low performance norms
low productivity
low cohesiveness + high performance norms
moderate productivity
low cohesiveness + low performance norms
moderate to low productivity
Role
a set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit.
Role Identity
certain attitudes & behaviors consistent with a role.
Role Perception
an individual’s view of how he or she is supposed to act in a given situation.
Role Expectations
how others believe a person should act in a given situation.
Role Conflict
a situation in which an individual is confronted by divergent role expectations
Status
Position (hierarchy) occupied by a member within a group
can be applied to groups
related to power
The higher the status
the greater the permission to break the group’s norms
Higher status within a group usually means greater ability to influence it & therefore greater ‘power’.
Decision making in groups. → strengths
More complete information
Increased diversity of views
Higher quality of decisions (more accuracy)
Increased acceptance of solutions
Higher creativity
Decision making in groups → Weaknesses
More time consuming (slower)
Increased pressure to conform
Domination by one or a few members?
Ambiguous responsibility
Less efficient
group techniques
Face to face discussions.
Brainstorming.
Electronic voting (anonymity)
Groupthink
It refers to a decision-making process in which highly cohesive groups, look for convergence & suppress the objective evaluation of alternatives.
groupthink can lead to
bad decisions, unsatisfactory results & polarization.
This process includes directive leaders & low access to counter-arguments
Illusion of invulnerability
excessive confidence & optimism.
Belief in inherent morality
The group assumes its own morality is the valid one, ignoring ethical concerns.
Rationalization
collective justification of decisions
Stereotyping outsiders
negative or simplistic views of outgroups.
Pressure for uniformity
members are pressured to conform.
Self-censorship
members withhold counterarguments to avoid social rejection
Illusion of unanimity
unanimity appears to exist as a consequence of self-censorship.
Mindguards
some members act to “protect” the group from counterarguments or discrepant information
Cultural communication
A form of communication that aims to share information across different cultures & social groups.
The sets of social reinforcement contingencies that survive throughout generations.
Sometimes benefitting certain groups in detriment of others.
Some examples of cultural communication

Enculturation
learning your native culture (e.g., with parents, peers, schools, religious institutions, government, media…)
Acculturation
learning a different culture from your native
Ethnocentrism
neglecting or underestimating other culture’s practices
Cross-cultural miscommunication
occurs when a person from one culture sends a message to a person from another culture & the person from the second culture does not receive the sender's intended message.
The greater the differences between the sender's & the receiver's cultures, the greater the chance for cross-cultural miscommunication
Cultural Shock
The reaction we might have when encountered with different cultures
It has been proposed that culture shock occurs in four stages
Honeymoon
The crisis
The recovery (usually around 6-12 months)
The adjustment