1/115
sigh
narrow definition of politics
conflicts/struggles over:
leadership
structure
policies
of government
the goal: to have a share/say in composition of govt leadership, organization, policies
broad definition of politics
who gets what, when, and how; beyond just the ‘government’ or ‘state’, looking at all holders of power in society:
the ways they achieve their goals
the ways they affect others’ lives
textbook definition of politics
the struggle in any group for power that will give 1/+ people the ability to make decisions for the larger group
focusing mostly on politics relating to govts
political science definition (narrow + broad)
narrow:
the branch of knowledge that deals w systems of govt
broad:
systematic study of politics (and politics is about power)
political scientists question:
the meaning of power
how power is gained/lost
how it’s organized/contested
how it’s used/abused
political science modified broad definition
a social science concerned w/ description/analysis of political and especially govt’l institutions + processes
political scientists —> focus on struggle for leadership + power in a political community
political party, elected office, city, region, country
study struggles over public power
comparative politics definition
involves the systematic study + comparison of the world’s political systems
compares the pursuit of power across countries
studying struggles over public power + how it’s organized in diverse societies
looking at the politics inside countries
elections, political parties, revolutions, judicial systems
power
the ability to determine the distribution of resources
the ability to influence others/impose one’s will on them
institutions
organizations/activities that are self-perpetuating + valued for their own sake
e.g. branches of govt, military, political parties, civil society groups
challenges in the approach to comparative politics
real world countries are always changing/diverse
individual causes cannot easily be isolated
number of cases to study = limited
available information = limited
regional specialization = uneven
selection bias = problematic
cause/effect difficult to demonstrate (endogeneity)
methodologies to comparative politics
quantitative v. qualitative
large-scale comparisons v. in-depth case studies
experimental methods
state
in IR: a territory; synonym for country
in comparative politics: not just territory, but also political system w/in it, legal system, and political community
human community that successfully claims monopoly of legtimate use of physical force w/in a territory
regime
system of governance; particular configuration of power
degree of permanence
individual leaders come and go, but system stays the same
in comparative politics, not negatively connotated (unlike popular rhetoric)
government
particular group of officeholders
can change regularly
more institutionalized —> less institutionalized
state, regime, government
culture
customs, attitudes, practices of a society
political culture
political customs, attitudes, and practices of a society
how people expect their political system to work
shaped by history
i.e. history conditions people to expect specific things from their government
imperial system (overview)
existed for 2000+ years
begins w/ Qin dynasty, followed by Han dynasty
size/coherence of China varying over time, but idea of single common historical narrative remains powerful
confucianism
emphasis on achieving social harmony
5 key relationships:
1. ruler/subject
2. neighbor/neighbor
3. father/son
4. husband/wife
5. brother/brother
emphasis on respect for elders + authority
obedience, acceptance of place
legalism (Han Fei)
realist approach to governing
assumes people are selfish and need to be controlled through rewards and punishments
focused on effectively organizing state power
key features of the imperial system
confucianism v. legalism
centrality of the emperor
bureaucracy
social hierarchy
highly developed culture
strong national pride
centrality of the emperor in china
seen as the sun god, more than human, someone everyone is due to respect
emperor’s word is law
bureaucracy in china
feudalism, later replaced by civil service
emperor training people to govern territories not their own (ensuring loyalty to emperor, not communities)
social hierarchy in china
lower classes sometimes rising up, feeling too oppressed/impoverished
highly developed culture in china
chinese taking great pride in history
well-developed art forms
theater, opera, sculpture, painting, martial arts, cuisine
strong national pride in china
conscious of having a very old history
history as important to the framing of the present
the dynastic cycle
note: not quick changes

dynasty
set of people who pass power down one to another
reasons for decline of imperial system
economic problems
overpopulation
landlessness
peasant rebellions
western military + economic intervention
opium war: chinese govt tried restricting access to opium/trade, which was controlled by British, who saw this as affront to profit, who then sponsored war —> attacked chinese culture, rooted in christian missionaries
boxer rebellion
western intellectual influence
bankruptcy of confucianism
discontent of masses influenced by communism + other ideas
intellectuals like Sun Yat-Sen trained in west
motions toward communism
1911: Qing Dynasty overthrown
1916-1927: War Lord period (diff terrirories of China governed by diff people; warlords; violent/impoverished/insecure period)
1919: student revolt - May 4 movement, agianst foreign imperialism + traditional social values
Guomindang (GMD)/Kuomintang (KMT) founded w/ Sun Yat-Sen as leader
1922-1934: GMD/KMT-CCP alliance
1925: Chiang Kai-Shek (Jiang Jieshi) becomes GMD leader, breaks alliance w/ Communists
1934: purge of Communists and Long March to Yenan
1937-1945: war w/ Japan, GMD-CCP alliance
1945-1949: Chinese Civil War, GMD flees to Taiwan
China’s continuity
continuous Chinese civilization has existed for 1000s of years
directly shapes + informs modern Chinese society + politics
social structure, order, institutions, civilization; level of organization
“Regime” in China
dynastic system could be considered a single regime
yet, each dynasty = own regime
each organized around particular set of institutions
regime (particular systems of rule) examples:
Warlord Period
KMT rule
Communist rule
“Government” in China
each monarch represents a new govt
each leader of Communist China has installed a new govt
sometimes govt has changed under same leader
As we look at China under CCP, what features have been retained?
revolution + Mao claims to have fundamentally changed it all
but: markets changed, and CCP political control remained
Retained features:
1-party CCP rule
party-state control (CCP above govt institutions, directs major decisions)
authoritarianism (limiting political opposition/protest/media/dissent)
ideology/propaganda (socialism/marxism-leninism, party loyalty —> legitimacy)
state control (in strategic industries, land, economic planning)
control of military + security
Does CCP represent a break with the dynastic cycle or a new dynasty?
CCP breaking w/ imperial system ideologically, but retaining governing practices that can be interpreted as a modern ‘new dynasty’
Break:
CCP ending imperial rule in 1949
rejected emperor, hereditary dynasty, Confucian political order, traditional Mandate of Heaven
instead: claimed legitimacy through communist ideology, revolution, nationalism, later economic performance
New dynasty:
similar to past dynasties:
CCP centralized authority, uses vast bureaucracy, prioritizes unity/stability, presents self as restoring national strength/order
Mao ~ an emperor; Communist bureaucracy ~ updated imperial bureaucracy
Why turn to Communism?
Chinese population ready for change:
economy doing poorly (WW1, WW2, warlord period, japanese intervention 1930s/40s, civil war in China)
inequality widespread (poverty, filthy wealth)
leaders corrupt + violent (strong military force, corruption)
state became weak domestically
China weak internationally (nationalist party not standing up for china)
characteristics of Chinese Communism
communists coming to power after decades of struggle —> informed party’s nature
Long March —> anything is possible through perserverance + struggle
party gained experience working w/ rural pop
japanese occupation period: communists —> countryside, connected w/ local farmers; CCP as party of peasants/ruralists
campaigns
tool of transformation + control
a major top-down push for mobilization
China under Mao - Moderate Period: 1949-1956
initially left much old system in place
began land distribution + economic development
working against economic collapse, class disparity
eliminating power of landlords, facing intolerant political leaders
campaigns = important tool (public gatherings, struggle sessions, self-criticism)
campaign v. counter-revolutionaries 1950
people opposed to coming revoltuion, trageting landlords/businesspeople
Three Anti Campaign 1951
rooting out corruption, waste, bureaucracy
Five Anti Campaign 1952
against businesspeople
e.g. bribery, state property theft, tax evasion, cheating on govt contracts, stealing state economic info
these would get targets to stand in front of crowd, apologize, reform
China under Mao - Move to Extremism: 1956-1966
100 Flowers Campaign 1957
Mao: let 100 flowers bloom, let 100 ideas spread
Mao let people criticize - asking wants, how to improve
people + govt officials gave criticisms
Anti-Rightist Campaign 1957
criticizers themselves got criticized + punished
govt officials targeted for not understanding Mao’s program + disloyalty
Great Leap Forward 1957-1961
force of will —> drive chinese economic development
party leaders, esp. in rural parts, told to double/triple rice production to collectivize
food given to CCP + cities, none left for rural parts; 30mil famine deaths
no free travel, state-controlled communication; no one knew it was happening everywhere
economic setback, disaster
1961 Mao sidelined; Zhou Enlai, Liu Shaoqui, Deng Xiaoping taking leading roles
pushed for more moderate position
farmers allowed own farmplots, in addition to collective farming
The Great Proletariat Culture Revolution: 1966-1976
leadership struggle: Mao reasserted authority over Liu Shaoqui, Zhou Enlai, and Deng Xiaoping
Mao supported by army chief Lin Biao
Liu + Deng removed from office
Mao raised up as central leader
ideological struggle: Mao’s wife Jiang Qing led Gang of Four
used young people to attack traditional customs/leaders
attacked/berated teachers, temples destroyed; attempted root-out of all chinese culture + traditions
Why did people get caught up in Cultural Revolution?
politicization of society
leftist control of media
veneration of Mao as great hero
leadership struggles not publicly known
belief in true possibility of creating a new society
The Red Guard
attempt to root out Chinese culture, destroy buddhist temples, christian statues, ancient art
assembled + took down structures from older dynasties
Decline of Cultural Revolution
fighting among Red Guards —> army intervention 1968
social disorder —> population against Cultural Revolution
1969: worst disruptions over
Lin Biao dies 1971 after coup attempt
Zhao Enlai rehabilitates/restores Deng, who runs govt by 1975
Zhou dies Jan 1976, Deng ousted, public rallies around Deng
Mao dies Sep 1976, Gang of Four arrested Oct
China after Mao
1978 Deng rehabilitated
wasn’t head of state/govt/high position, but always called the shots (someone else public face)
1978-1979 Democracy Wall Movement
people wanting to move beyond Mao-era policies, arguing for a fifth modernization: democracy
wanting political reform + economic modernization (more public participation, democratic rights)
Deng: supported economic reform, but rejected challenges to CCP 1-party rule
govt suppressed movt + activists
1980s economic reforms, limited political reforms
move to let local communities choose local leaders
only at most local level
pushing too far —> Deng cracked down
1987 most radical reformers ousted (Hu Yaobang, general secretary of CCP)
1989 Hu’s death inspires Tiananmen Square protests beginning Apr 15
June 4, 1989 protests shut down violently
Zhao Ziyang ousted for sympathizing w/ protestors
message sent: economic reform would not be accompanied by political reform
Leaders of China
Mao Zedong 1949-1976
Deng Xiaoping 1978-1995
(Zhao Ziyang 1987-1989)
powerful official seen as running a lot of China
Jiang Zemin 1989-2002
Hu Jintao 2002-2012
established principle of limited (two 5-year) terms
Xi Jinping 2012-present
violated/eliminated limited terms
holds almost all top positions
current president + CCP secretary general (top two positions)
nondemocratic regimes (definition)
political regimes: controlled by small group, exerting power over state w/o being constitutionally responsible to public
nondemocratic regimes: public plays no significant role in selecting/removing leaders from office
not representative of people, no transfer of power, corrupt, no free/fair elections, lack of free speech, no respect to human rights
civil liberties limited, few opportunities for meaningful participation exist
types of nondemocratic regimes
personal and monarchical rule
e.g. everyone having a poster of Mao
military rule
initial leaders in China all participated in Long March, fought against KMT —> got liberties
Mao having great respect for army
current leadership not tied to military
historically under Mao/Deng: military background important
one-party rule
consistent
under/after Deng, some movement towards election under Communist party
but all have to be Communist; choice w/in party, but must always be party
competitive authoritarinism
a regime that has trappings of democracy, like elections, but where only group in power can realistically win
elements of democracy, but really authoritarian
What distinguishes totalitarianism?
highly centralized rule in which state seeks to control every aspect of life
political, social, economic
seeks to control fully what people believe/think
Was China ever fully totalitarian?
“iron rice bowl” - workers assigned to danwei (occupation w/ lifetime job security, steady income, lifelong social benefits)
gave some things, didn’t just take
never fully succeeded at totalitarianism
never had full govt control
when having excessive power, got pulled back
Why do O’Neil, Fields and Share look at Communist states separately?
they are a distinct type of one-party authoritarian regime
controlling not only political power, but much of economy + society
shared ideological foundations, common historical experience
e.g. collapse/transformation of communist regimes
What distinguishes Communist states?
combination of communist ideology + highly centralized political/economic system
single communist party holding leading role in state + society
democratic centralism: top decisions bind lower levels
state owns/controls major economic resources, uses central planning (not market reliance)
regime claims legitimacy through goal of building socialism/communism
tightly controlling political opposition, media, civil society
*when past scholars discuss “1st” v. “2nd” v. “3rd Worlds”, Communist states were the 2nd World
sovreignty
the ability to carry out actions and policies within a territory independent of external actors and internal rivals
autonomy
the ability of the state to wield its power indepdently of the public or international actors
How weak or strong has the Chinese state been across time?
China state capacity changing over time
periods of relative weakness/foreign pressure
CCP strengthened state:
centralizing poltiical control
building state institutions
asserting China’s independence under Mao
Mao-era isolation —> reduced outside influence, but limited China’s connections to global economy
today:
strong state, major economic/diplomatic influence
USA exercises caution in dealing w/ China (important trade partnership)
Trump declaring sanctions against Iran, punishing those trading w/ them; 90% of Iranian oil —> China, Trump refuses to push China
China after Deng
1989 Tiananmen protests
1997 Deng dies
1989-2002 under Jiang Zemin, more collective leadership, wide economic reform
2002-2012 under Hu Jintao, reform slows
2012 Xi expected to expand reform, instead consolidates central power
Reforms since Mao
After period of substantial reforms, now running into difficulty
1978-1989 birth of reform
1989-2003 post-Tianenman, post-Soviet constrained reform
2003-2012 stagnating eform
2012-present reform unwinds
What is Mao’s legacy?
still regarded as founder of Chinese Communist regime
remains nationalist hero
raised China from weak state to world power
economic policies largely rejected (particularly, emphasis on agrarianism)
state continues to play active role in economy - not complete free market
Carl Minzner, “China After the Reform Era,” 2015
since 1989, Beijing has upheld CCP rule at all costs
but in that drive: CCP leaders eroded the late-20th century foundations of success
CCP as not a successful authoritarian governance
China = example of pitfalls in failing to politically reform
Yuen Yuen Ang on institutionalization
institutionalization: refers to established patterns, expected or habitual behaviors
institutions = structures; behaviors solidifying as structures = institutionalized
aspects of institutionalization in China
regular leadership succession
meritocracy
officials advancing through ability (experience, performance, education, party service) rather than just inheritance
professionalized bureaucracy
trained officials administering policy through large, specialized state + party system
systems for popular input
local participation, petitions, consultations, feedback mechanisms
public concerns —> officials, w/o competitive nat’l democracy
How has Xi Jinping challenged post-Mao political institutionalization?
Xi strengthening CCP control, while making the system more personalistic and less institutionally constrained
more centralized personal power
Xi concentrating authority around self
weakening collective leadership norms + regular succession
reduced political openness
local elections, petitions, limited protests, public feedback exist
but political expression + civil society activity = tighter control
challenge to meritocracy
Xi rise linked to elite CCP family background
father = senior revolutionary official
political connections mattering alongside bureaucratic experience
What is Ang’s main takeaway about CCP resilience under Xi?
Xi —> powerful CCP, but dependent on 1 person
CCP remaining strong under Xi: firm control of China, popular support
Xi’s personalist rule creating vulnerabilities w/in CCP:
Xi death/incapacity —> succession crisis
ideological decision-making a potential pitfall of policy
personalist rule = refusal to heed sound advice
How much change did the 1949 Chinese revolution bring?
Changes
upper classes replaced by peasants
rejection of religion + tradition
redistribution of land
role of military declined
party-state structure of govt differed
Post-Mao:
social safety net for poorest
Continuities
social hierarchy based in part on birth
reverence for authority
centrality of emperor/Communist Party leader
bureaucratic civil service
strong nationalism
Post-Mao:
class inequality
explanations for political continuity: cultural explanations
political inertia: the observation that things generally continue as they have in the past, unless there is some outside influence/radical event forcing change
political culture: society’s norms for political activity
people expecting politicians to act in certain way
regime change not necessarily changing expectations/habits
historical experience —> political culture
political culture in china has not changed much
culturally: lots of continuity w/ prerevolutionary China
Cultural Revolution: breaking authority, yet doing so b/c emperor told to; doing so collectively as a group; culture remaining continuous
elements of Chinese political culture
expect strong leader
expect centralized power
value obedience + authority
value interests of community > individual
fear of disorder, value peace + order
strong nationalist pride
explanations for political continuity: institutional explanations
The past constrains the future; political systems tending to follow established paths, even after major change
historical institutionalism: looks at institutional continuities
past institutions —> shaping present politics
even revolutions reflect past institutions (preserving/adapting older rules/organizations/governing practices)
path dependence: decisions made limit options in the future
early political choices create certain path
(key idea borrowed from economics)
Seymour Lipset’s 1959 theory
a version of modernization theory, that economic growth encourages democratization
modernization theory: countries develop in a single way, moving from being '“backwards” to more “developed”; pushed to democracy
How do we explain China’s divergence from Lipset’s theory (economic growth w/o democratization) according to Minxin Pei?
totalitarian institutions survived economic reform; new wealth strengthened CCP authoritarian system
CCP retained centralized Leninist party-state + control over key sectors of economy/info/coercive institutions
growing middle class depended on state for jobs/wealth/opportunity
less independent/less likely to demand democratic change
economic growth —> more resources for regime to:
reward supporters, strengthen surveillance/repression, protect privileges of party-connected elites
political reform did not dismantle these institutions; Xi could later revive more personalistic + repressive Mao-era practices
Chinese political institutions
China as a party state, in which state and party institutions are fused
regime as a single party regime, where no other political parties are allowed + single party dominates politics
at all levels: parallel structures of state + party
Chinese political institutions: state
the institutions that implement policy, administer laws, legislate under Party leadership

Chinese political institutions: party
the institutions that make politcal decisions, set direction, control personnel, and enforce loyalty

parallel structures of state and party
allow for China to be a party-state, as the CCP can reach/monitor/direct govt at every level
China having matching state + CCP party institutions at nearly every level
in theory: representation + authority rise from low to high
in practice: Party hierarchy directs/supervises state hierarchy
overlapping structures allow CCP to:
extend central authority deep into local society
monitor state officials + policy implementation through Party organizations
collect info + feedback from lower levels
prevent state bureaucracy from acting independently of Party priorities

People’s Liberation Army
important center of power; protects Chinese security + helps guarantee continued CCP rule
has own hierarchy + chain of command
but dependent on both state and CCP (through parallel Central Military Commissions)
in effect, the CCP’s army; Party leadership controls armed forces
Who runs China?
top leader not always obvious/most powerful on paper
problem of succession = most mediocre candidate rises ranks for being most inoffensive
Chinese leadership having never been fully controlled by 1, even under Mao
from the Politburo Standing Committee of 2012 to 2017, Le Keqiang remained Premier, everyone else shifted out
thus, Keqiang clearly had some power
PSC 2022: completely changed, all older men
mostly people who have worked way up; loyalty, inoffensiveness
most powerful govt positions
General Secretary of CCP
Premiere - Head of Govt
President - Head of State
Chair of Party Central Military Commission
Chair of State Central Military Commission - Commander in Chief
Leaders of China (in order)
Mao Zedong 1949-1976
Deng Xiaoping 1978-1995
Jiang Zemin 1989-2002
Hu Juntao 2002-2012
Xi Jinping 2012-present
*power has never been completely in 1 person’s hands
another way of understanding type of rule in China
oligarchy - rule by a small group
position comparison of Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping
Hu Jintao
General Secretary CCP 2002-2012
President 2003-2013
Chair of Party Military Commission 2004-2012
Chair of State Military Commission 2005-2013
Xi Jinping
General Secretary CCP 2012-present
President 2013-present
Chair of Party Military Commission 2012-present
Chair of State Military Commission 2013-present
How do we make sense of the contradictory points that:
Mao was extremely powerful like an emperor
The CCP has always been an oligarchy
the CCP was ruled by a small elite, but Mao was the dominant member of that elite
CCP was an oligarchy; senior Party leaders controlled main institutions of power (Party, state, militar, security)
Mao not literally ruling alone
Mao possessed personal authority
b/c revolutionary status, ideological leadership, military control, personality cult
dominated other leaders, bypassed Party procedures (esp. during Cultural Revolution)
power immense; still depended on cooperation/rivalry/support from CCP elites
Sun Yatsen
1911 Revolution leader
overthrew Qing dynasty
helped found Republic of China
“the father of modern China”
Chiang Kai-shek
leader of Nationalist Party (Kuomintang, KMT)
ruled Nationalist China
lost Chinese Civil War to Mao’s Communists in 1949
led Nationalist govt in Taiwan
Mao Zedong
leader of CCP
led Communist victory in 1949
founded People’s Republic of China
ruled until 1976 death
Zhou Enlai
a leading CCP official
China’s first premier 1949-1976
managed day-to-day govt work
key diplomat shaping China’s foreign relations
Deng Xiaoping
leader after Mao
launched market-oriented economic reforms + greater engagement w/ global economy
while preserving CCP one-party rule
Lin Biao
senior People’s Liberation Army (PLA) commander
Mao’s close ally + officially designated sucessor
died 1971
Jiang Qing
Mao’s wife
radical leader during Cultural Revolution
member of Gang of Four
massively influenced culture, propaganda, attacks on political enemies
arrested after Mao death 1976
Hu Jintao
China’s top leader 2002-2012
served as CCP General Secretary, later President
emphasized collective leadership, balanced development, harmonious society
transferred power to Xi Jinping though orderly succession
Xi Jinping
China’s current leader
CCP General Secretary since 2012, President since 2013
centralized power, strengthened Party control over state + society, eliminated presidential term limits
weakened post-Mao expectations of regular leadership succession
Why do people obey their government?
the govt has authority
sources of authority
legitimacy
coercion
all regimes rely on both legitimacy and coercion to maintain authority
obedience out of fear of consequence
there is no system that is so legitimate that it does not need coercive force + vice versa
authority
the ability to command obedience and respect from a subject population
legitimacy
the idea that a government has a justifiable right to rule
coercion
the use of force or the threat to use force
sources of legitimacy
tradition and religion
Chinese tradition = emperors conquering territory + establishing authority, then claim dynasty (ruling b/c fam in charge for centuries) + connection to divine
elections, political parties, participation
act of voting = engages people, ties people to govt
unification against enemies, form of mobilization
ideology
under Mao, ideology = most important source of legitimacy
used to convince people that a system is legitimate
propaganda
benefits - providing security, prosperity, services to population
claim = ppl should support regime b/c of benefits + b/c CCP will protect from threats
performance legitimation - KEY in post-Mao China
china as a world power; belted road initiative'; investing in other parts of world —> tangible results means China has right to rule
misc. - int’l approval, shared identity
ideology
a set of doctrines and beliefs that explain and justify a political system
performance legitimacy
the belief that a govt or ruling power has the right to govern b/c it delivers tangible results and meets the practical needs of the public
ideology in China: key elements of Maoism
class struggle
peasants as revolutionary class, organizing against others
voluntarism
power of people, power to change world if coming together
requiring adhering to mass line + rooting out ‘wrong thought’ (campaigns)
mass line
going along with the teachings of the party
egalitarianism
eliminating social hierarchies, reducing gap btw elites/working masses, promoting collectivism
anti-elitism
called anti-intellectualism; believing poor classes should rule; excluded masses —> power
nationalism
what is left of Maoism in China today?
widespread sense of nationalism
mass line - emphasis that you are all supposed to agree
especially on line of anti-corruption
What are the bases for legitimacy in China today?
tradition of respecting authority
ideology important—esp. nationalism, promises of equality—but less important than under Mao
nationalism - pride in Chinese independence/success
most important: promise of prosperity
benefits coming to people from booming economy
economy cooled —> promise softened
prosperity co-opting many (people benefiting from economic growth), but not all
maintaining control
increasingly costly, yet Xi govt intent on restricting dissent
surveillance increasing under Xi
forms of coercion
defend law + maintain order
protests like Tiananmen 1989 = threats to security
defend integrity of state
demands of minority groups (Uighurs, Tibetans) = challenging state integrity
HK, Taiwan = state integrity issues
maintain rulers in office
surveillance
in authoritarian regimes: protecting those in power, rather than fighting crime/terrorism/separatism
Cultural Revolution pervasive: everyone reporting on each other (e.g. children on parents)
bodies of coercion
police: maintaining law and order
censorship, tracking technology
army: defending state integrity
special forces, presidential guard: maintain rulers in office
ministry of state security: surveillance
Is the use of coercion inherently illegitimate?
not if it’s seen as justified
can actually increase support for state