PSYC1000 Week 1: Scientific Method Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering key concepts from PSYC1000 Week 1 lecture on the scientific method, theory-data cycle, characteristics of good theories, pseudoscience, and peer review.

Last updated 3:45 AM on 9/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

12 Terms

1
New cards

Producers of Research

Individuals who generate research information by performing experiments, analyzing data, and publishing results (e.g., researchers, PhD students, professors).

<p>Individuals who generate research information by performing experiments, analyzing data, and publishing results (e.g., researchers, PhD students, professors).</p>
2
New cards

Consumers of Research

Individuals who read research information and incorporate findings into practice (e.g., psychologists, teachers, general public).

<p>Individuals who read research information and incorporate findings into practice (e.g., psychologists, teachers, general public).</p>
3
New cards

Scientific Theory

A set of statements that attempt to explain observations and general statements about how variables relate to one another, enabling testable predictions.

4
New cards

Theory-Data Cycle

An iterative scientific process where a theory leads to research questions, designs, hypotheses, and data collection, which then feeds back to strengthen or revise the theory.

<p>An iterative scientific process where a theory leads to research questions, designs, hypotheses, and data collection, which then feeds back to strengthen or revise the theory.</p>
5
New cards

Empiricism

An approach in science where knowledge and scientific theories are grounded in and supported by systematically collected observational and experimental data.

6
New cards

Falsifiability

A essential characteristic of a good theory specifying that observable data could exist that would contradict or disprove the theory.

7
New cards

Parsimony

The scientific principle, also known as Occam's razor, stating that all other things being equal, the simplest solution or theory is the best.

8
New cards

Pseudoscience

A set of claims or practices presented as scientific but lacking scientific standards, characterized by non-falsifiability, lack of self-correction, confirmation bias, and evasion of peer review.

9
New cards

Phrenology

An example of a pseudoscience, historically advanced by Franz Gall (1758−18281758-1828), claiming that character traits and faculties could be read from the shape and bumps of the human skull.

<p>An example of a pseudoscience, historically advanced by Franz Gall ($$1758-1828$$), claiming that character traits and faculties could be read from the shape and bumps of the human skull.</p>
10
New cards

Facilitated Communication

A pseudoscientific technique that evades empirical testing and peer review by using ad hoc arguments, such as claims that testing conditions destroy the process or require total belief.

<p>A pseudoscientific technique that evades empirical testing and peer review by using ad hoc arguments, such as claims that testing conditions destroy the process or require total belief.</p>
11
New cards

Learning Styles Theory

A popular but empirically unsupported theory positing that individual learning modes (e.g., visual vs. verbal) are stable traits and that teaching must match a student's preferred style for optimal learning.

12
New cards

Peer Review Process

The multi-stage evaluation mechanism in scientific publishing where submitted manuscripts undergo screening, review by independent experts, and editorial feedback prior to publication.

<p>The multi-stage evaluation mechanism in scientific publishing where submitted manuscripts undergo screening, review by independent experts, and editorial feedback prior to publication.</p>