1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
True or False: Manslaughter occurs when there’s an intentional killing
True
Common Law: Manslaughter
Unlawful killing of a human being by another human being without malice aforethought
Common Law: Voluntary Manslaughter
An intentional killing in which defendant takes a life in “sudden heat of passion” as a result of “adequate provication”
True or False: Could Diminished capacity may lead murder to be changed to manslaughter
True
Common Law: Manslaughter: Provocation (4 Parts)
Provocation must “inflame the passion of a reasonable man and tend to cause him to act for the moment from passion rather than reason”
Most jurisdiction find that words alone are insufficient
Killing must occur in sudden heat of passion - defendant could not have had reasonable time to cool off
Consider a defendant’s personal characteristics IF it is relevant in measuring the gravity of the provocation
MPC: Manslaughter - Extreme Mental or Emotional Disturbance
The defendant kills under the influence of an “extreme mental or emotional disturbance” for which there is a “reasonable explanation or excuse”
Reasonableness of actions should be determined from the perspective of a person “in the actor’s situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be”
Words alone can qualify
No provocation requirement
MPC: Manslaughter - Extreme Mental or Emotional Disturbance - Excuse
Excuse is for the emotional disturbance not for the act itself
MPC: Recklessness
Reckless conduct that does not manifest an extreme indifference to human life is manslaughter
Can’t include subjective (ex: disability)
Provocation stems from the situation
Common Law: Two kinds of involuntary manslaughter
Killing another person in a criminally negligent manner (ex: low educated parents not taking child under the doctor until it’s too late)
Unlawful Act doctrine (misdemeanor-manslaughter) (ex: pushes someone in battery - they’re drunk, the person hits their head, and they die)
Common Law: Two kinds of involuntary manslaughter - Criminally Negligent
Defendant should be aware, but is not aware, that his conduct creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk of social harm
Common Law: Two kinds of involuntary manslaughter - Unlawful Act Doctrine (Misdemeanor-Manslaughter)
Deaths that occur during unlawful acts that do not trigger the felony-murder rule fall within the unlawful act doctrine
Not a felony
Common Law: Two kinds of involuntary manslaughter - Unlawful Act Doctrine (Misdemeanor-Manslaughter) - Limitations
Some apply to all misdemeanors
Inherently wrong/dangerous misdemeanors
MPC: Recklessness (2 Parts)
Reckless conduct that doesn’t manifest an extreme indifference to human life is manslaughter
Recklessness involves the defendant being aware that he is taking a substantial and unjustifiable risk to human life
^^ Does it pose a threat to human life
Doesn’t manifest to extreme indifference to human life (thin life)
MPC: Negligent Homicide
A criminally negligent killing (MPC definition of negligence)