enzyme kinetics + inhibition

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/32

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:01 AM on 10/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

33 Terms

1
New cards

The michaelis menten equation

The initial velocity is equal to Vmax times the substrate concentration over the Michaelis constant plus the substrate concentration. Michaelis Menten equation applies to enzyme catalyzed reactions that display this hyperbolic behavior, which is first order in substrate at low substrate concentration and zero order at saturation. When the concentration of substrate is smaller than Km the bottom substrate concentration is not counted and because Vmax and Km are both constants, then Vo is directly proportional to the concentration of substrate. All enzymes that have this hyperbolic graph follow Michaelis Menten kinetics. A​

Allosteric (regulatory) enzymes with cooperative substrate binding give sigmoidal curves and do not follow Michaelis Menten kinetics.​

​

The Michaelis-Menten equation is a rectangular hyperbola with a = Vmax, b = Km, and x = [S], the same form as the oxygen-binding curve of myoglobin, because V0/Vmax is the fraction of active sites holding substrate.​

When [S] ≪ Km, the [S] in the denominator becomes negligible, leaving V0 = (Vmax/Km)[S], so V0 is directly proportional to [S] and the reaction is first order in substrate.​

Substrate concentrations far above Km make Km negligible in the denominator, so [S] cancels and V0 = Vmax, with the reaction zero order in substrate; the approach is gradual, since V0 reaches 91% of Vmax at 10 Km and 99% at 100 Km.​

Enzymes with hyperbolic curves follow this equation, whereas allosteric enzymes with cooperative substrate binding give sigmoidal curves resembling the oxygen-binding curve of hemoglobin and fall outside Michaelis-Menten kinetics.​

2
New cards

what is kcat

kcat, the turnover number, is the number of substrate molecules one active site converts to product per second at saturation, and its reciprocal gives the duration of one catalytic cycle.​

kcat = Vmax/[E]T, where [E]T counts total active sites, so kcat for an enzyme with several active sites is expressed per site.​

The table spans more than a millionfold, from carbonic anhydrase at 600,000 s−1 (one cycle every 1.7 μs) to lysozyme at 0.5 s−1 (one cycle every 2 s).​

kcat describes speed only at saturation and gives no information about performance when substrate is limiting, so the measure of catalytic efficiency is kcat/Km, which combines turnover with binding.​

3
New cards

what does kcat/Km represent?

Substituting Vmax = kcat[E]T into each limiting form of the Michaelis-Menten equation shows which constant sets the rate in each region of the curve.​

Most of the enzyme is free far below Km, so each turnover depends on E and S meeting and on ES converting to product, and kcat/Km combines both steps.​

Nearly all of the enzyme is ES at saturation, so binding no longer limits the rate, and the turnover number alone sets the rate.​

​

Substituting Vmax = kcat[E]T into the two limiting forms shows which constant controls the rate in each region of the curve.​

The low-[S] form, V0 = (kcat/Km)[E]T[S], applies when most of the enzyme exists as free E, so each catalytic event requires an encounter between E and S followed by conversion of ES to product, and kcat/Km is the second-order rate constant (M−1s−1) for that whole sequence.​

kcat/Km equals k1k2/(k−1 + k2), so it can never exceed k1, the rate constant for binding, which diffusion caps near 108 to 109 M−1s−1; the three enzymes in the pre-lecture table all sit near that ceiling.​

The saturating form, V0 = kcat[E]T, applies when nearly all of the enzyme is ES, so binding no longer limits the rate and the catalytic step alone determines the speed; kcat is a first-order rate constant (s−1) for that step.​

​

4
New cards

Enzyme kinetics is ligand binding plus a catalytic step​

Kₘ versus Kd: Both constants are the concentration that fills half the sites, both carry concentration units, and both fall as binding tightens. The difference is that a bound ligand can leave only the way it came, whereas ES has a second exit, forward to product. Kₘ = (k₋₁ + k₂)/k₁ counts both exits. Splitting the fraction gives Kₘ = Kd + k₂/k₁, where Kd = k₋₁/k₁ is the true dissociation constant of ES. Keeping half the sites full takes more substrate when ES has two exits than when it has one, so Kₘ can never be smaller than Kd. The two values match when ES falls apart far faster than it reacts (k₂ ≪ k₋₁). They diverge when catalysis is fast, which is why Kₘ is best described as an apparent affinity. Kd also comes from binding measurements at equilibrium, whereas Kₘ comes from rate measurements at steady state. Kₘ is therefore a kinetic constant even when its value happens to equal Kd.​

5
New cards

kcat

how fast does a filled site work?

6
New cards

Km

how much substrate fills half the sites?

7
New cards

kcat/Km

How well does free enzyme capture and convert scarce substrate?​

8
New cards

what does Kcat/Km report

A rate depends on how far the transition state sits above wherever the enzyme spends most of its time. A saturated enzyme sits as ES, so kcat reports the climb from ES to the transition state. An enzyme far below Kₘ sits mostly as free E, so kcat/Kₘ reports the climb from E + S to the same transition state.

9
New cards

X-axis: (1/[S])


The reciprocal of substrate concentration. As substrate concentration increases, \(1/[S]\) decreases.

10
New cards

Y-axis: (1/V_0)


The reciprocal of initial reaction velocity. Lower values correspond to faster reaction rates.

11
New cards

Slope: Km/Vmax


The ratio of the Michaelis constant to the maximum reaction velocity.

12
New cards

Y-intercept: 1/Vmax


The reciprocal of maximum reaction velocity. Vmax = 1/y intercept

13
New cards

X-intercept: -1/Km


The negative reciprocal of the Michaelis constant. Therefore, Km=-1/x-intercept

14
New cards

competitive inhibition LBP

  • Vmax: unchanged

  • Km: increases

  • Lines intersect on the y-axis.


15
New cards

noncompetitive inhibition LBP

  • Vmax: decreases

  • Km: unchanged

  • Lines intersect on the x-axis.


16
New cards

uncompetitive inhibition

  • Vmax: decreases

  • Km: decreases

  • Lines are parallel.


17
New cards

competitive inhibiton

  • Inhibitor competes with the substrate for the active site.

  • Often resembles the substrate structurally.

  • Adding more substrate can outcompete the inhibitor.


18
New cards

noncompetitive inhibition

  • Inhibitor binds at a site other than the active site (an allosteric site).

  • Can bind to either the free enzyme or the enzyme–substrate complex with equal affinity in pure noncompetitive inhibition.

  • Adding more substrate cannot fully overcome inhibition.


19
New cards

uncompetitive inhibition

  • Inhibitor binds only after the substrate has bound to the enzyme.

  • The inhibitor traps the enzyme–substrate complex, preventing product formation.

  • Adding more substrate does not overcome inhibition.


20
New cards

KI

inhibitor binding to the free enzyme (E).

21
New cards

KI’

  • inhibitor binding to the enzyme–substrate complex (ES).

A lower \(K_I\) or \(K_I'\) means stronger inhibitor binding.


Inhibition type

\(K_I\) vs. \(K_I'\)

Competitive

KI' to infinity (inhibitor does not bind ES)

Pure noncompetitive

KI = KI' (equal binding affinity)

Uncompetitive

KI to infty (inhibitor does not bind free E)

Mixed

KI does not equal KI (different binding affinities)


22
New cards

Vmax

Rate with every active site holding substrate, no

inhibitor present

23
New cards

a (alpha)

All substrate-free enzyme, E plus EI, divided by E

24
New cards

a’ (alpha prime)

All substrate-bound enzyme, ES plus ESI, divided

by ES

25
New cards

apparent Vmax

Ceiling measured with the inhibitor present

26
New cards

Apparent Km

[S] that gives half of that ceiling

27
New cards

alpha vs alpha prime for the different inhibitors

Inhibition type

\(\alpha\)

\(\alpha'\)

\(V_{\max}\)

\(K_m\)

Competitive

\(>1\)

\(1\)

Unchanged

Increases

Pure noncompetitive

\(>1\)

\(=\alpha\)

Decreases

Unchanged

Uncompetitive

\(1\)

\(>1\)

Decreases

Decreases

Mixed

\(>1\)

\(>1\), unequal to \(\alpha\)

Decreases

Increases or decreases


  • Competitive: only \(\alpha\) changes because the inhibitor binds free enzyme.

  • Uncompetitive: only \(\alpha'\) changes because the inhibitor binds only ES.

  • Pure noncompetitive: both change equally.

  • Mixed: both change, but unequally.


28
New cards

competitive inhibition

Binds E only

α′ = 1

1/α left at low [S]

All left at saturation

29
New cards

uncompetitive inhibition

Binds ES only

α = 1

All left at low [S]

1/α′ left at saturation

30
New cards

noncompetitive inhibition

Binds E and ES equally

α = α′

1/α left at every [S]

31
New cards

Mixed, binds tighter to E

Binds E more tightly

α > α′

1/α left at low [S]

1/α′ left at saturation

32
New cards

Mixed, tighter to ES

Binds ES more tightly

α′ > α

1/α left at low [S]

1/α′ left at saturation

33
New cards