Research Methods and Statistics Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/44

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering fundamental concepts, definitions, study designs, validity types, measurement scales, and statistical terms from the research methods lecture notes.

Last updated 9:57 PM on 10/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

45 Terms

1
New cards

Science

A systematic, empirical way of gaining knowledge based on observation and data (not authority/intuition) that tests falsifiable ideas and is public, repeatable, and self-correcting.

2
New cards

Population

The entire group you want to draw conclusions about.

3
New cards

Sample

The subset of the population you actually measure; results are generalized back to the population, so representativeness matters.

4
New cards

Basic research

Research that aims to expand knowledge and test theory with no immediate practical use required (e.g., how muscle fiber type relates to force production).

5
New cards

Applied research

Research that aims to solve a specific practical problem or evaluate an intervention (e.g., does a training program improve balance in older adults?).

6
New cards

Cyclical steps of the research process

Identify question/idea -> review literature -> form hypothesis -> design study & get IRB approval -> collect data -> analyze data -> interpret/conclude -> report results -> new questions (cycle repeats).

7
New cards

Hypothesis

A specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables.

8
New cards

Theory

A well-supported, organized explanation of a phenomenon that generates testable hypotheses; broader and with more evidence than a hypothesis.

9
New cards

Quantitative research

Research that uses numerical data and statistical analysis.

10
New cards

Qualitative research

Research that uses non-numerical data (interviews, observations, open-ended responses) to understand meaning and experience.

11
New cards

Empirical

Based on direct observation or measurement, not just opinion or logic.

12
New cards

Reliability

Consistency of a measure: gives the same result on repeated measurement (test-retest, inter-rater, internal consistency).

13
New cards

Validity

Whether a measure or study actually measures/shows what it claims to.

14
New cards

Meta-analysis

A statistical method that combines results from many studies on the same question to estimate an overall effect.

15
New cards

Deception (in research)

Withholding or misleading participants about the study's true purpose; allowed only when necessary, risk is minimal, and participants are debriefed afterward.

16
New cards

Debriefing

A process after participation where researchers explain the true purpose, reveal any deception, answer questions, address distress/harm, and let participants withdraw their data; required when deception is used.

17
New cards

Nominal scale

A measurement scale consisting of categories only with no order (e.g., sex, sport played, blood type).

18
New cards

Ordinal scale

A measurement scale with ranked order, but spacing between ranks is unequal or unknown (e.g., finishing place in a race, pain rankings, Likert items).

19
New cards

Interval scale

A measurement scale with equal spacing between values but NO true zero (e.g., temperature in C or F, calendar year).

20
New cards

Ratio scale

A measurement scale with equal spacing AND a true zero, so ratios make sense (e.g., height, weight, VO2max, strength, reaction time).

21
New cards

NOIR

Memory trick for scales of measurement: Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, Ratio; each level includes the properties of the ones before it.

22
New cards

Correlational research

Research that measures the relationship between two variables WITHOUT manipulating either; used when manipulation is impossible/unethical, or to explore relationships and make predictions.

23
New cards

Correlation coefficient (rr)

A statistic ranging from −1-1 to +1+1. The sign indicates direction (++ both rise together, −- one rises as other falls), and the absolute value indicates strength (near 00 is weak, near 11 is strong).

24
New cards

Correlation vs. causation

Correlation does NOT equal causation because a third variable or reverse direction could explain the relationship.

25
New cards

Coefficient of determination (r2r^2)

Proportion of variance in one variable explained by the other (e.g., r=.70r = .70 gives r2=.49r^2 = .49, or 49%49\% shared variance).

26
New cards

Experimental research

Research where the investigator manipulates the independent variable, controls other factors, and typically uses random assignment; allows cause-and-effect conclusions.

27
New cards

Non-experimental research

Research with no manipulation (correlational, observational, descriptive, surveys); can show relationships/descriptions but not causation.

28
New cards

Internal validity

Confidence that the independent variable caused the change in the dependent variable and not something else (confounds, history, maturation, selection bias).

29
New cards

External validity

How well results generalize to other people, settings, and times.

30
New cards

Internal vs. external validity trade-off

The principle that tight laboratory control raises internal validity but can lower external validity.

31
New cards

Independent variable (IV)

The variable manipulated or grouped by the researcher (presumed cause).

32
New cards

Dependent variable (DV)

The variable measured as the outcome (presumed effect).

33
New cards

Pilot study

A small-scale trial run before the main study to test feasibility, procedures, timing, and equipment, find problems, and refine the design.

34
New cards

Pseudoexplanation

A statement that sounds like an explanation but only restates/labels the observation (circular reasoning) and cannot be tested (e.g., 'He is aggressive because he has an aggressive personality').

35
New cards

Pseudoscience

Claims presented as scientific but lacking scientific method: unfalsifiable, relies on anecdotes/testimonials, no peer review, resists disconfirming evidence, and uses vague language (e.g., astrology).

36
New cards

Volunteer bias

The tendency for volunteers to differ from non-volunteers (more motivated, educated, interested, healthier), meaning the sample may not represent the population.

37
New cards

Standard error of the mean (SE)

A measure of how much sample means would vary from the true population mean (precision of the mean); calculated as SE=snSE = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}, where ss is the sample standard deviation and nn is the sample size. Gets smaller as sample size increases.

38
New cards

Standard error vs. standard deviation

Standard deviation (SD) describes the spread of the data; standard error (SE) describes the precision of the sample mean.

39
New cards

Outlier: z-score rule

A rule identifying an outlier as a value beyond ±3 SD\pm 3\,SD from the mean (some use ±2.5\pm 2.5).

40
New cards

Outlier: IQR rule

A rule identifying an outlier as a value falling below Q1−1.5×IQRQ1 - 1.5 \times IQR or above Q3+1.5×IQRQ3 + 1.5 \times IQR (what boxplot whiskers show).

41
New cards

Bland-Altman plot

A graphical method to assess agreement by plotting the difference between two methods against their mean, with mean bias and 95%95\% limits of agreement (bias±1.96×SD of differences\text{bias} \pm 1.96 \times SD\text{ of differences}).

42
New cards

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)

A statistic used for continuous data and assessing reliability or agreement between raters or trials.

43
New cards

Cohen's kappa

A statistic that measures agreement for categorical data, correcting for chance agreement.

44
New cards

p-value

The probability of getting results at least as extreme as yours IF the null hypothesis were true.

45
New cards

p-value decision rule

If p<αp < \alpha (usually .05.05), reject the null hypothesis (statistically significant). If p≥αp \ge \alpha, fail to reject the null hypothesis.