1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Metacognition
Thinking about thinking
Ability to monitor and regulate one’s own thinking, reasoning problem solving, learning, etc
Three essential skills related to Metacognition:
Planning - How can I accomplish this task? What resources do I need? How to start?
Monitoring - How am I doing? Is this making sense?
Evaluating - Can I finish? Am I finished?
3 types of knowledge related to metacognition
1.Declarative Knowledge
Procedural Knowledge
Self-Regulatory Knowledge
Declarative knowledge
knowledge you can declare
Explicit
Content Specific
Knowledge about self as a learner
Procedural Knowledge
knowing how to use skills
Self-Regulatory Knowledge
When, why, and how to apply declarative and procedural knowledge
Most difficult to accomplish
what do students need to learn something?
Focus attention to relevant information
Effort, make connections, process information
Regulate and monitor learning
what should be included in teaching learning strategies?
Exposure to general and specific strategies
Self-regulatory knowledge - when/why to use strategy
Motivational component to counter reliance on easier, less effective strategies
Self-efficacy
learning strategies of expert students
focusing attention - using headings, outlines, learning outcomes
organization - concept maps, drawing, flow charts
summaries - brief and important ideas only
underlining/highlighting - over-used and not very effective
note-taking - paraphrase, review and flag unknown material; not very effective
what technique do all effective learning strategies have?
doing something with the information; not just rote memorization
common elements of reading strategies
Previewing → find subheadings, boldface, etc
Questions → “What do I expect to learn?”
Read
Summarize/Review → main ideas/paraphrase
3 aspects of problem solving
identify/ frame the problem
devise strategies to solve problem
make decision if the problem has been solved
problem solving: identify
understand the statement of the problem and the whole problem
what do novice and expert learners focus on in problem identification
Novice learners → focus in surface details
Expert learners → focus on deeper meaning
Why are problems easily identifiable in the early elementary years
as children gain experience with problem identification, they need less help with identification
problem solving: devise strategies
critical thinking - students need to be taught how to use this
long term memory - students can use prior knowledge
The more possible strategies and solutions produced, the more successful the problem solving
Critical thinking
unbiased evaluation by logically and systematically examining the problem, evidence and conclusions
algorithm strategies for problem solving
Uses precises steps and instructions
Following the algorithm exactly will always lead to success → errors come from incorrectly following or algorithm itself is wrong
Can be inefficient; too many steps to come to solution
Lots of info to keep in working memory
Ex. steps for long division
Heuristic strategies for problem solving
General approach to problem solving; rule of thumb approach
Ex. means-ends analysis, working backwards, analogical thinking
Efficient; less instructions to remember
Simpler approach then algorithmic → less info kept in working memory
Does not always lead to solution; results may vary
Individual must try a new strategy when original strategy does not work
Ex. tv isn’t working → turn it off and try again, laptop won’t work → restart it and try again
Problem Solving: decision making
Is the solution acceptable? Can I move on?
Risk: risk averse unless loses
When people are trying to recover from a loss, the more they are willing to take on bigger risks
Can I make a bad decision here and be okay or will there be consequences
Motivation: how motivated is the student to do well?
Experience: if student has experience in this problem solving area, then they have knowledge as to what make a good final product/answer vs. if they have no experience, then its much harder for them to judge when they are finished
ex. final exam vs homework practice
Characteristics of Expert problem solvers
have domain and procedural knowledge
focus on relevant details
can perceive large meaningful patternns
good at monitoring their own performance
lots of practice
things that interfere with problem solving
functional fixedness
response set
representativeness
availability
belief perseverance
conformation bias
Functional fixedness
Considering only typical uses for materials, tools, etc
Rigid thinking
Response Set
Tendency to represent problems in a familiar way and respond to them in the same way
I do it this way because that is the way i have always done it
Representativeness
Judgements based on stereotypes
Availability
What is available in your memory, what comes to mind first
Belief Perseverance
Tendency to hold onto beliefs despite contradictory evidence
Conformation Bias
Tendency to search for and consider evidence only if it is consistent with my beliefs and discount/ignore contradictory evidence
Transfer
previous learning influences current learning
automatic transfer
Overlearning, multiple contexts
thoughtful transfer
Deliberate application of knowledge (strategy, procedure, concept) to new situation
positive transfer
Goal in education
Easiest with related domains and the knowledge transfer is direct and explicit
With unrelated domains, the transfer will be abstract or conceptual
What encourages positive transfer
Mastery and practice
Teaching when/how to use strategies (procedural knowledge)
Practice with feedback; don’t want student practice skill incorrectly
Students should be able to apply skills to novel problems
negative transfer
previous learning interferes with or hinders new learning