1/162
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Goal of Descriptive Epidemiology
How a disease or risk factor is distributed in a community (Who, What, When, Where)
Goal of Analytic Epidemiology
Causal agents (Why, How)
Sources of Gathering Quantitative Data
Individuals, health Care Facilities, Environment, Public Health Agencies
Methods for Gathering Quantitative Data
Notification/Reporting, Registries, Survey of Interview Data
Sentinel Reporting…
relies on a pre-arranged sample of healthcare providers who agree to report certain disease/conditions
Benefits of Sentinel reporting
can be less costly and more efficient than traditional reporting as well as more specifically targeted geographically
Passive reporting…
is provider initiated reporting
Active reporting…
involves local or state health departments soliciting reports from health care entities or reviewing records to find cases
Registries are…
methods for tracking events or persons diagnosed OVER TIME
Tracking over time allows us to …
understand diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and outcome information
Surveys are a method of data collection to understand…
behaviors that impact health
Counts -
number of cases, events, individuals with certain characteristics P
Proportions -
what fraction of the population is affected
Rates -
how fast the outcome is occuring
Numerator of frequency -
new or existing outcomes
Denominator of Frequency -
persons at risk for the outcome
Prevalence is the…
amount of disease present at a defined time
Prevalence is a…
proportion, boundaries are 0-100%
Point vs. Period Prevalence
specific point in time vs. over a certain time period
Survivor bias makes prevalence less useful for…
studies relating to cause (etiologic studies)
Incidence rate or Density rate is…
how fast disease is occurring in a population over a specified time interval
Incidence/Density Rate is synonymous to…
Mortality rate
Incidence/Density Rate Formula
(#new cases/total person * time) *K)
Incidence Rate assumes…
uniformity of risk over time
Fixed Population -
nobody can enter or leave outside of death
Dynamic Population -
people can enter or exit over time
Formula for calculating Incidence rate with aggregate population data
[#new cases/(midpoint population*length of study time)]
Cumulative Incidence (Risk)…
Chances of becoming a case over a defined interval
Cumulative Incidence Formula
New cases / Count of persons at risk at start of interval
Cumulative Incidence/Risk is a…
proportion, boundaries 0-100%
Cumulative Incidence/Risk is synonymous to
Incidence Proportion
Bathtub Figure
Incident Cases (Faucet) > Prevalent Cases (Tub Water) > Deaths, Emigrations & Recovery (Drained Water)
Case Fatality (proportion) is the…
Cumulative Incidence of death among those who have a disease
No Denominator >
Count
Frequency of existing disease at a single point in time →
Prevalence
Occurrence of New disease events over time (fatal or not) →
Incidence
Denominator of initial risk >
Cumulative Incidence
Incidence Density Rate Denominator →
Person Time at Risk
Occurrence of New disease events over time (fatal) >
Mortality
Ratio of Risks is used to understand…
exposed vs unexposed risks
Proportionate Mortality Ratio does not tell us about…
underlying risk
Proportionate Mortality Ratio tells us…
proportion of mortality across defined population (ex. deaths to cause / deaths of all causes)
Incidence can be used to measure the occurrence of…
any kind of event
Three components of incidence:
Population, Event, Observation Period
Cohort studies…
group people with common characteristics followed over time for outcome development
In a cohort study, exposure is observed…
before outcome
Cohort study design is ______ but data collection can be _______
prospective; retrospective
In a cohort study exposure is observed ____ the outcome.
before
t/f Cohort studies can be observational or experimental
True
t/f Cohort study population is selected after exposure is identified
false
Cohort studies usually require ______ follow up times
long
Study ID:
Random sample of adult population 30-59 in Framingham, MA in 1948 (n=5209, 2/3 of target pop)
Data Collection: prospective with in-person exams conducted every 2 years through 2014
Medical history, CV physical exam, blood, urine, ecg, other heart imaging
Milestones: Smoking as rick for heart disease, hypertension increase risk for stroke, obesity risk factor for heart disease…
Prospective Cohort
Study ID:
Cohort – children ~10 years with exposure to diabetes in utero (past exposure) and those that didn’t
Every perinatal medical record reviewed to determine exposure status (blinded) outcomes obtained by MRI
Hypothesis was exposure would increase centralized obesity in childhood
Retrospective Cohort
Cohort Study Strengths
Direct observation of incidence
Allows changes in exposure
Allows study of rare/multiple outcomes
Temporal sequencing
Cohort Study Weakness
Impractical for rare diseases (may not have enough occurrence)
Require large sample size
Long time follow up
Limited to measured exposures
Potential Biases of Cohort Study
Selection Bias
Information Bias (misclassification & info quality)
When is Cohort study Appropriate?
Prior evidence of association from another study design or RCT not possible
Hierarchy of evidence for Causal Relationship
Systematic Review → RCT → Cohort → Case-Control → Cross-Sectional → Case Series / Expert opinion
Case-Control studies…
study groups selected on the basis of outcome status
Case-Control data collection is ALWAYS _______
retrospective
Case-Control study design is always ______
Observational
Reverse Causation -
having disease alters exposure
If knowledge of being a case results in more information on exposure for individual or record sources → becoming a case results in exposure recording
This is an example of ____
Reverse Causation
Controls represent the ______
base population that gave rise to the cases
Control sampling is valid if ________
prevalence of determinant is same as the base population
Overmatching occurs when
cases and controls are too similar to eacother (ex. twins) and become non-representative of the base population
Advantages of Multiple Controls
increased study power (n) up to 1:4 case:control
(Ex. of Multiple controls) Role of aspirin in occurrence of Reye Syndrome in children groups
Children at same hospital + Children visiting emergency room same hospital + Children attending same school
Cases & Controls match by…
factors you want to remain similar (age, time of diagnosis, etc.)
Efficient matching is important in that it provides…
similar distribution of confounders in cases and controls.
Group Matching -
Proportion of controls w/ similar characteristics to cases
Individual Matching -
Each individual case gets a control with similar characteristics (mostly used in hospital studies)
t/f Matching factors cannot be studied as determinants
true
Strengths of Case-Control
good for rare disease
Quick and Cheap
Can use existing data
Limitations of Case-Control
Cannot establish temporal sequence
Cannot calculate incidence
More bias than Cohort
Hard to study disease mechanisms
Study ID:
Question: Is maternal smoking in 1st trimester associated with CHD
Outcome
Cases – singleton births with CHD identified from hospital discharge data in Washington state 1989-2001
Controls – randomly selected live-born singleton births matched by year of delivery (3 controls per case)
Exposure – maternal self-report of smoking on birth certificate
Design – retrospective
Data on determinants/exposure collected retrospectively
Case-Control
Section bias is _______
differential probability being included in the study based on exposure status
Recall Bias is when _________
Cases may have been more or less likely to report exposure than controls
Case-Control Studies can be used as a _______
preliminary step to justify a cohort study
Cross Sectional Studies are useful for:
patterns of exposure and outcome
burden of illness & risk factors
determining service needs
hypothesis generation
Probability Sampling methods:
random stratified, random systematic, random clustered
Non-probability sampling methods:
convenience, judgmental, snowball method (cannot be used for statistical conclusions)
Cross-Sectional Study Advantages
quick and cheap
descriptive
Cross-Sectional Study Dis-advantages
non-temporal
association but NOT causality
selection bias (healthy people will participate more)
survivor bias
Study ID: NHANES
Examines nationally representative sample of 5,000 persons. Each year across the US, sample is selected using 4 stage sample design
Sample weights are used to produce estimates for entire target population
Cross-Sectional
Ecological Studies are…
Observation studies assembled from aggregate data across populations with different characteristics
data is collected from summary measures rather than individuals
Study ID:
per capita chocolate consumption to Nobel laureate population
Ecological study
Cross-sectional
Nested Case-Control take advantage of ________
defined cohort with prospective exposure and outcome assessment
Nested Case-Control cases are selected _________ and controls are matched to each case or by calendar time.
from cohort as they occur
Reasons to conduct a Nested Case-Control Study
rare outcome
minimized bias (recall/information
tight control of confoundind
Selecting from the same underlying cohort means _____
cases & controls have greater comparability
Case-Cohort Cases are selected ________
as they occur form a parent cohort study
Case-Cohort Controls are ________
randomly sampled from parent cohort rather than being matched
Reasons to Conduct Case-Cohort
clear sequence of events
eliminates resale and reverse causation biases
more economical (possibility of multiple studies in one)
lower confounding → prospective exposure measurement
Study ID:
Was event triggered by an immediately preceding unusual event.
Case-Crossover
Advantages of Case-Crossover
Cases serve as own control
eliminates non-variable confounding (genetics, location, gender)
Study ID:
Does folic acid antagonist use during pregnancy increase risk for cardiovascular birth defects
Case window: month 2-3 of pregnancy (cardiovascular development)
Case-Crossover
Assumption of Case-Crossover
exposure/confounders don’t change systematically over time
timing of exposure doesn’t affect reporting
exposing is intermittent (temporary variable)
induction periods are short
Measures of Occurrence -
indicate the magnitude of occurrence in a group, do not indicate association