1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
In what respects can race be said to be real and in what respects is it an illusion?
race is a social category
these labels effect things like laws, wealth, and healthcare
it has real effects
but it is a biological illusion
skin color has a alot of variation based on region, doesn’t necissarily fall into neat boxes
skin color and race only has weight to it because human beings made it that way
What were the key tenets of “racial science” and why is it now largely dismissed as a “pseudo-science”?
racial science: set of ideas claiming that humanity is divided into races and ranked by superority
key tenets: races are fixed, skin color could show lack of intelligence naturally, and races shoudlnt be mixed because of this
this was used justify things like slavery and the holocaust
it is now dissmissed because the evidence doesn’t actually equate to their claim
theres no evidence actually backing up what was being said
In what respects does the social construction of “race” yield or produce biomedical or health consequences for those classified as belonging to racial minorities?
discrimination and unequal treatment can create stress, leading to other health issues
segregation and unequal wealth push minorities into impoverished communties
bias and racism can lead to untreated pain, lower quality care
In what respects can humor or play be understand as constituting “reversible worlds” that hold up critical mirrors to lived experiences of race and racialization?
within humor things can be mocked and the unsayable can be said
people can be racist through humor and create stereotypes
humor can also be a way to cope for marginalized communities
How over time have concepts and imagery of “Whiteness” been broadly established as natural or the norm in mainstream North American social spheres?
through law and culture, everyday habit
made it seem like whitness was the norm/default
slavery and civil rights era
housing policies like redlining
beauty standards
Under what conditions can works of art or performance contribute to the interrogation or undoing of racial hierarchies?
art can expose stereotypes
art can unsettle viewers instead of comforting them and using humor
it doesnt always connect to a wider message and instead just pushes stereotypes
What do you consider to be the most compelling explanation or explanations for the rise and long-term persistence of racial terror lynching in the post Civil War United States?
used for social control
white southeners really wanted the racial hiearchy back
economic motives: lynching targeted wealthier black people
states allowed it
public spectacle
How have cinematic portrayals helped establish Harlem as a place of dreams and of nightmares?
some films show Harlem as a place of creativity
some films show Harlem as a place of violence
shows real hardships in Harlem such as housing discrim and drug epidemics
flattens the complex situation in Harlem into a stereotype
If you were to author an interpretive banner to be placed on the National Mall, in front of a Smithsonian museum, about how legacies of slavery or racism ought to be understood, what might such a banner say?
“The Past has Not Passed”.
civil rights and slavery was not a distant chapter in US history
affected everything to this very moment
new systems of discrimination continued after slavery and will continue after civil rights
not assigning blame to the living but showing how the past shapes the present
To what extent can the Western Apache joking practice of “playing the Whiteman” be understand as a political critique of colonial racial hierarchies?
kinda
exaggerating how white people speak and act
they reverse the traditonal hiearchies
lets the marginalized group express their frusrations
private not as public as racist jokes
subtle, everyday critique