1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Stroop task focused vs. divided attention
Say the words of colors ~ 6 sec
Say the colors + the words corresponds to color ~ 6 sec
Ignore words, say the colors ~9 sec
Focused/Selective vs. Divided Attention
Focused - Party and focus on the person in front of you
Divided - Talking whilst driving with attention focused more on talking
Auditory attention
Factors that influence our attention to respond to an auditory message
dichotic listening
task to shadow (repeat back) to the assigned message and disregard the other unattended message
shadowing
repeat back
basis for selection
= Auditory
1. Location
Select your attention to someone close to you
2. Physical characteristics
Male voice with low freq.
Female voice with high freq.
3. NOT Meaning
Harder if same location + physical characteristics
CANNOT use meaning to selectively attend to a channel
unattended message
Little memory for message
Not noticed if it’s in another language
Not aware of meaning
processing of unattended info
ALSO flaws in the early filtering theory
Galvinic Skin Response to Conditioned Words (Lie Detector)
Even if unaware of the words
Will notice Name
Bilinguals will notice unattended message in their language so unattended = attended message
Early vs. late selection/filtering
Early = Filters first then recognition occurs
Late = Recognition occurs first then filters out message
Early selection/filtering
Both messages inputted in each ear
Both detected then filtered
Attended = filtered = shadowed
Unattended = not filtered
Recognition of attended message
late selection/filtering
Both messages inputted in each ear
Both get recognized
Both get filtered
Attended = filtered = shadowed
Unattended = not filtered
i.e. hearing name or word quite later
attenuation
Both messages inputted in each ear
Both detected then bypasses attenuator
Attended = pass in full strength
Unattended = volume decreased
Recognition of attended and unattended in diff. volumes
Overt vs. covert attention
Overt
Must MOVE head to look at object
Covert
Shifts you CANNOT see from the outside
eyes locked in center of rm BUT can still look in objects in peripheral
Posner’s spatial cueing task
Example of spatial cuing task was eye fixated on arrow = Covert
Start with fixation point
Does/Doesn’t Present the Arrow Cue that point to where rectangle MIGHT show up
Then response with buttons ASAP when rectangle flashes
Posner’s spatial cueing task results
evidence suggests we covertly move visual attention to process the area we covert
relates to the spotlight theory
spotlight/zoom-lens model
supported by the Posner’s spatial cueing task
i.e. Spotlight moves with actors
there were benefits in the valid cue
there were costs in the invalid cue
Feature integration theory
Explains why we cannot pay attention to everything
Has different features that are processed in the brain in different areas
Feature integration theory flaw
Does not identify where things aren’t paying attention “glue” to
feature vs. conjunction search
Feature Search
Faster (POP-OUT)
Autonomic
ID from # of distractors
Conjunction Search
Slower, need to move and disengage attention
Controlled bc need to look around
Depends on # of distractors
Visuospatial neglect
Patients with R Partial Lobe Lesions
Issues: Fail to pay attention to the LS (Contralateral to the damage)
Neglect Theory: explained as disengage deficit
Left Neglect = Difficult to disengage attention rom RS of space
Neglect Theory: explained as unbalanced competition between hemispheres
Hemisphere inhibit each other
Processing stimuli on one side, inhibits processing of stimuli on the other side
Damage to one hemisphere causes other hemisphere to dominate
RS stimulus = processed by L hemisphere
LS stimulus = processed by R hemisphere
If R hemisphere is damage → cannot compete and stimuli on LS gets neglected