1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Descriptive research methods
Observation
interviews/focus groups
Surveys
Conjoint analysis
Brain imaging/physiological tracking
Social listening
Causal research methods
Experiments
Statistical/econometric methods
Instrumental variables, natural experiments
Observation
Observing usage behaviors is great for discovering consumers’ unique innovations
Observation at scale
RFID tags, phones, cameras help track the movement of customers in retail environment
Technology powered by advancements in camera technology, decreasing costs of cameras
Surveys
Avoid question ambiguity/confusion
Avoid double-barreled questions
Avoid leading questions
Sampling/response bias
Hard to get perfectly representative samples
The individuals who respond are often self selected
Keep in mind how sample was collected
How sample affects participation
Aim for high response rates
Re-weight results based on known demographics
Projective survey techniques
Tap into consumers deep attitudes, motivations, beliefs
Allows marketers to capture emotions and associations that lie below conscious awareness
Psychodrama technique
Trying to uncover deep emotion drives in decision making—Is Dove soap masculine or feminine?
ZMET technique
Studying obvious associations of your brand
Nestle revealed their brand is a reminder of pleasant childhood memories
IAT test
Implicit Associations Test
Measures errors and reaction time
Common issues
Low test-retest reliability
Weak evidence of link between IAT scores and behavior
Could IAT be measuring familiarity with an association?
Lots of stimuli in questions
Common survey issues
People lie
People don’t know why they like what they like
The questions shape the answers
fMRI can tell us what self-report can’t
But neural precision can receive too much credit
Solution: Add neuroscience jargon, and people are more likely to believe it
Emerging technologies: people tracking
RFID tags, mobile devices, and cameras can help track the movement of customers in retail environments
Concerns
Loss of privacy
Racial bias
Facial recognition performs worse on non-white, non-males
Legislation
Some locations banned usage
Correlation =/ causality
Correlation: movement in one variable is related to movement in another variable
Causation: movement in one variable produces movement in another variable
Variables:
X = Independent variables (factors to manipulate)
Y = Dependent variable (behaviors, perceptions, feelings)
Z = Confounds that affect both X and Y
3 factors to draw casual conclusions
Correlation
No third factor
Temporal antecedence
The cause must precede the effect (order of events)
Experiments
Experiments are the gold standard for establishing causality
The poor alternative to experimentation
Company leaders pick policies based on intuition
Random assignment is essential
Ensures potential confounds are balanced across groups
Larger sample sizes are more likely to reveal truth about population but not always possible (time or money constraints)
Limitations of experiments
Expensive to run
Infeasible for large, systemic changes
Short run experiments vs longer term effects
Incremental improvements don’t always lead to a global optimum
Causal Inferences from Observational Data
Statistics and econometrics can help us draw causal inferences from observation data without the need for an experiment
Examples
Natural experiments
Instrumental variables
Only some of the variation in X is random
Causal Inference Doesn't Tell You Everything
If you manipulate an IV, what else will happen?
The ideal sequence
Develop insights and hypotheses via descriptive methods ←→
←→Test hypotheses via experimentation or causal inference methods