1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Cognitive Model
Pathway 1: phonological awareness and print concepts; decoding and sight word knowledge; fluency in context and automatic word recognition.
Pathway 2: vocabulary, background knowledge, and knowledge of sentence and text structures; understanding the language of the text.
Pathway 3: general and specific purposes for reading and knowledge of strategies used to achieve those purposes.
= Reading Comprehension
limitations (Missing):
affective aspects of reading (motivation, etc.)
self-regulation
sociocultural factors
linguistic backgrounds
connections between elements
Pathway 1
Phonological Awareness
Print Concepts
dyslexia comes into play
Automatic Word Recognition
Limitations: if you focus tm on decoding words you lose the chance to find the meaning of the texts
Pathway 2
Vocab Knowledge
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Text and Sentence Structures
Language Comprehension
bring meaning to words
(stored in gyrus in the temporal and Occipital lobe)
Limitation: if you rely only on background knowledge, you aren’t decoding or making sense of what the author is trying to teach you; rather, what you know from past experience
Pathway 3
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Strategic Knowledge
Limitation: if the reader doesn’t have a purpose, they won’t be able to fully connect with a text cuz they are left with: Why should I read this? What will it help me with in the long run?
Simple View of Reading
Word Recognition x Language Comprehension = Reading Comprehension
End goal: reading comprehension
Word recognition: the ability to transfer print into spoken language
phonological awareness
decoding
sight word recognition
Language comprehension: the ability to understand a spoken language
verbal reasoning
background knowledge
vocab
language structures
literacy knowledge
Reading comprehension: the ability to understand a written language
skilled reading
Limitation: one or the other; do you have it or not? If not, you cannot reach reading comprehension
Cognitive Model (Coraline ex)
Pathway 1: broke up/ chunking the words he didn’t know and giving more/ less attention to the words that we found most crucial to understanding the story
Pathway 2: He was able to make meaning out of the story and was able to draw on evidence from the text to not only support the compare-and-contrast worksheet but also the drawing of the scene (RW, OW)
Pathway 3: by giving him the comparing and contrasting worksheet we gave him a purpose to reading this story
SVR (Coraline ex)
SVR Predicts 4 diff types of reading
Dyxlexia
Poor decoding skills mean the reader can’t access the words, despite good language comprehension
Mixed-type or “garden-variety poor reader”
Trouble with decoding and language comprehension results in poor reading comprehension
Average or Advanced Reader
Good decoding skills and language comprehension result in good reading comprehension
Hyperlexia
accurate decoding but poor language comprehension results in poor understanding of written text
Scarborough's Rope
Expands on SVR (each supskill is a strand → get stronger the tighter the ropes are tied tg)
Language comprehension
Background knowledge
Vocab knowledge
Language structures
Verbal reasoning
Literacy knowledge
→ as this grows reader becomes more strategic in their reading
Decoding (word recognition)
Phonological awareness
Decoding (and spelling)
Sight recognition
→ more automatic in their reading
All this leads to reading comprehension (skilled reader)
Occipital lobe
Immediately into the letterbox
individual letts
whole words
groups of letters
Connect to our tutoring experience (SVR, Scarborough’s Rope, and the Cognitive Model)
SVR
What are the factors that make a text complex?
TCMI (Text Complexity Multi-Index)
-Four step process that teachers can use in matching texts and students
-CCSS (Common Core State Standards) have recommended a staircase of text complexity in Appendix A to ensure that HS seniors are able to read at a college and career levels
-Lexiles: A readability system cited in Appendix A
CCSS Establishing Complexity of Texts
-Qualitative analyses of features such as levels of meaning (e.g., readers need to make
inferences to understand a character’s motive)
-Reader-task variables
-Such as readers’ background knowledge of a text’s topic
-Ways in which teachers and situations influence readers’ interactions with a text
Distinguish quantitative measures from qualitative features such as syntax, vocabulary, knowledge demands, levels of meaning, and organization?
Nearly all readability formulas analyze two main features of texts: Syntax and vocabulary
Syntax: Measured in number of words per sentences (or syllables)
Vocabulary: Compare the words in a text to a vocabulary list that have been keyed to
different grade levels (number of syllables in words)
New generation of readability systems (Lexiles, etc…) use digital technology
Average frequency of all the words in a particular text established in comparison with all the words in a database
Gets an average word frequency
Average used in a mathematical formula to get a Lexicle (L) from 0 to 2,000.
Lower end of scale: Green Eggs and Ham and A Kiss for Little Bear
Higher end of scale: Principles of Geochemistry
Sometimes, the middle of the scale can have less differentiation
Equating infrequent words with complexity, readability formulas can overestimate the complexity of informational texts
Specific Features: Sentence Length
Used consistently in readability formulas
Short sentences do not necessarily support comprehension some cases, sentences longer resulted in better comprehension
Specific Features: Vocabulary
Closely tied to comprehension
Alternative assessment (Assessment of core vocabulary)
Sense of how many words are on a page of a book
Scan several pages from different parts of the text with the goal of locating words that are infrequent and may be challenging to decode
View repetitions of the potentially challenging vocabulary
Examine the hard words in relation to the entire text
Step 2: Qualitative Benchmark Texts
Based on matching texts with model or anchor texts
Get a sense where book fits relative to other books
Benchmark texts represent concrete representations of the goals represented in increasing proficiency with complex text
Step 3: Qualitative Rubrics
Four dimensions:
Levels of meaning
Knowledge demands
Language conventions and clarity
Structure
Step 4: Readers, Tasks, and Contexts
A sense of students’ capabilities is essential
Source of Language Complexity
Word Meanings
endowed, unalienable, deriving, just
syntax
Several claims sit inside one long sentence
cohesion
these, they, their, that refer across ideas
knowledge
rights, government, consent, historical context
reasoning
The reader must reconstruct the argument
How can you support reading a challenging word? Be able to apply a broad coaching prompt and a targeted cue.
Breaking up a word
Using images to support understanding
Similar word groupings (-tion)
Briefly go over this in word work to give multiple exposures, but don’t put too much attention on this as to stump the student or make them feel discouraged
Which words deserve tutoring time related to vocabulary instruction? Consider issues like breadth and depth
Tiered system: Tier 1 (everyday words), Tier 2 (less common + more important for comprehending texts, used across many topics)
Tier 2 words
Sophisticated words
Words that are important to the text and therefore may show up in following texts
Some words that require less explicit instruction you can “breeze through”
Breadth = surface level definition (one definition)
Depth = knowing how the word can have different meanings and be used in different contexts
Deep word knowledge
Showing how the word can have different meanings in diff contexts
When placed in certain contexts (placed near certain words), you can infer the meaning of the word in these specific contexts
Sounding out of phonetics changes based on the letters around it
Be able to apply the four SWIT categories to a short selection, then justify powerful instruction, brief explanation, inference, or leaving a word for another day.
Powerful instruction
go back to the text and provide contexts/ definitions of the word
have them pronounce the word correctly
show a pic if they still don’t understand
put the word in the context of an everyday event/ occurance
ex. participation (used vacation to help, what does it mean to participate? How do you participate in class?)
Brief Explaination
include a brief explanation or similie word that can be given to a student quickly for them to have a breadth of understanding of that word, then move on!
ex. Wigwam (showed a picture, explained that it’s their home, keeps them dry)
Leave for another day
if the learning objective isn’t on word work (decoding) don’t put too much stress on words
ex. “foreign” wasn’t in the specific group of texts I showed him during my lesson so I skipped over it because yes it is important to understand how Coraline thought of her dads cooking through the use of that word but, it wasn’t the learning objective or crucial in that moment