1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
invertible
nxn (square) matrix A iff there exists a nxn (square) matrix C such that AC = CA = In
inverse of A
A-1
(A-1)-1 =
A
(AB)-1
B-1A-1
(AT)-1
(A-1)T
Theorem on Invertible Matrices
If A and B are invertible nxn matrices, then A-1, AB, and AT are invertible.
Invertible Matrix Theorem (IMT)
Let A be an mxn matrix. Then the following are equivalent:
a. A is invertible
b. A is row equivalent to In
c. A has n pivot positions → REF(A) has n pivots
d. Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution (x = 0)
e. The columns of A are linearly independent
f. The linear map TA(x) = Ax is one-to-one
g. For any b ϵ Rn, Ax = b has exactly 1 solution
h. The columns of A span Rn
i. TA maps onto Rn
j. There is an nxn matrix C such that CA = In
k. There is an nxn matrix D such that AD = In
l. AT is invertible
m. The determinant of A, det(A), =/= 0
n. The columns of A form a basis of Rn
Determinant Theorem
There is a unique function det:{nxn (square) matrices} → R with the following properties:
if you add a multiple of a row to another row, the determinant doesn’t change
if you swap 2 rows, the determinant gets multiplied by -1
you can factor out a non-zero scalar from a row (then the determinant gets multiplied by it)
Triangular Matrices and the Determinant Theorem
If A is upper or lower triangular, then det(A) = the product of the diagonal entries
upper triangular matrix
square matrix in which all entries below the main diagonal are 0
lower triangular matrix
square matrix in which all entires above the main diagonal are 0
Transpose Determinant Theorem
det(AT) = det(A), so determinant rules work for columns as well as rows
det(AT) =
det(A)
det [a b]
. [c d]
ad - bc
cofactor of [aij]
(-1)i + j times the determinant of the submatrix of A made by deleting the ith row and jth column
Algorithm for Finding Inverse
form the super augmented matrix [A In]
row reduce [A In] to REF(A)
if A has fewer than n pivots (develops a zero row) → A is not invertible
otherwise, proceed
go to RREF(A), so [A In] becomes [In A-1]
Cofactor Expansion Algorithm
Choose a row or column of A
For each entry in it, compute its cofactor
Multiply each entry by its cofactor
Add up
Output = det(A)
Multiplicity of Determinants Theorem
det(AB) = det(A) * det(B)
Cramer’s Rule
Let A be an invertible nxn (square) matrix, b ϵ Rn. Suppose Ax = b. Then xi = det(Ai[b])/det(A).
adjugate of A
adj(A) = transpose of the cofactor matrix
formula for A-1 using adj(A)
A-1 = 1/det(A) * adj(A)
parallelopiped spanned by v1, … vn ϵ Rn
ΠA = {t1v1 + … + tnvn | 0 <= ti <= 1 for all i}
vol(parallelopiped) / vol(ΠA)
|det(A)|
Theorem: Effect of Volume on a Linear Map
Let T:Rn→Rm be a linear map. Let S ⊂ Rn with vol(S). Let A be the standard matrix of T.
Then vol(T(S)) = |det(A)| * vol(S)
T(S) = {T(v) | v ϵ S} or the set of all images T(v) where v is in S
vol(ellipsoid)
|det(A)| * 4/3π
vol(parallelogram)
|det([vertex 2], [vertex 3])| when anchored at (0,0)
vol(triangle)
1/2|det([vertex 2], [vertex 3])| when anchored at (0,0)
vector space
a set V with 2 operations:
v + w
λv, λ ϵ R
that has an element 0 ϵ V such that 0 + v = v
A U B
the set of all elements in A or B or both
A ∩ B
set of all elements in both A and B
polynomial
function p:R→R of the form p(t) = a0 + a1t + a2t2 + … + antn, ai ϵ R
zero polynomial
function where all constants = 0 with degree -∞
H ⊂ V. H is a subspace of V if:
0 ϵ H
H is closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication
Theorem on Span and Subspace
span(v1, … vp) ⊂ V is a subspace of V
Theorem on Linear Maps and Subspaces
Let V and W be vector spaces. T:V→W is a linear map. Then,
ker(T) = {v ϵ V | T(v) = 0} ⊂ V is a subspace of the domain
range(T) = {T(v) | v ϵ V} ⊂ W is a subspace of the codomain
T is one-to-one if and only if ker(T) = {0}
T is onto if and only if range(T) = W
ker(TA) =
nul(A) ⊂ Rn
range(TA) =
col(A) ⊂ Rm
basis
a linearly independent spanning set of V
Theorem on Bases and Vector Spaces
Every vector space has a basis.
finite dimensional
a vector space that has a finite spanning set
Theorem on Bases and Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces
Every finite dimensional vector space has a basis.
Theorem on Vector Spaces and Linear Dependence
Let V be a vector space. If v1, … vp ϵ V, they are linearly dependent if and only if at least one of them is a linear combination of the preceding vectors.
Theorem on Linear Combinations, Vector Spaces, and Span
Let v1, … vp ϵ V. Let H = span(v1, … vp). Suppose one of the vectors is a linear combination of the others. Then H will still be the span of the others.
Algorithm for Finding A Basis of a Finite Dimensional Vector Space
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space. Given V has a finite spanning set S = {v1, … vp}.
If S is linearly independent, it is a basis → finished
If S is linearly dependent, then one of its vectors is a linear combination of the others
Suppose vp is a linear combination of (v1, … vp-1), then V = span (v1, … vp-1) = S’
If S’ is linearly independent → finished
Otherwise, we can throw away one vector and still span V
Process will stop at the basis