1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Agricultural revolution
Transition from hunting-gathering to the development of agriculture, starting around 10,000 BCE; necessary to achieve industrialization centuries later
Agricultural revolution pros and cons
Pros: increase in food production, increase in population growth, more complex socio-economic structures
Cons: increased pressure on natural resources, less diversified diet/lower nutritional intake, increased exposure to diseases
Characteristics of agrarian societies
Low urbanization rates (around 6-8%)
Limited division of labor: based on age/gender rather than skills
High rate of self-consumption: 90/9/1
Low productivity: led to a limited surplus
Strong solidarity system (esp. in rural areas)
Urban revolution time, causes
Around 3000 BCE; food surplus caused by AR and the creation of stable societies led to population growth and social hierarchies
Urban revolution pros and cons
Pros: greater division of labor, accumulation of knowledge, more complex socio-economic structures (closer to modern states)
Cons: Higher taxation, more inequality
Proto-divergence
Early differences in development between Eurasia and the rest of the world
Causes of proto-divergence
Greater variety (and better) plant/animal species
East-West geographical orientation: facilitated crop/human migration, spread of knowledge
Less natural barriers
Earlier spread from Africa to Eurasia compared to other regions
Drivers of growth in agrarian societies
Technology: heavy plough, collar harness, three-year crop rotation, water mills
Markets: increased specialization and productivity (Smith), complementarity of town-country, joint advacement of agriculture/manufacturing/trade sectors
Role of the city
Specialized in manufactured goods, commercial/ecclesiastical services, exchange of goods
Most important cities: became centers for long-distance trade, dissemination of knowledge, commericial and financial capitalism
World-economy vs world economy
World-economy: interconnected, hierarchically organized, self-sufficient economic space, almost entirely separed from all others
World economy: entire interconnected system of the entire globe
World-economy concept creator, time, work
Fernand Braudel, 1979, Civilization and Capitalism 15th-18th Century
Fragility and resilience of (medieval) agrarian societies
Fragility: low productivity left them susceptible to climate/metereological changes → harvest fluctuations → one hardship year was manageable, more than 2 led to famine, aggravated by higher population
Resilience: solidarity system strengthened by family ties and village networks, esp. in rural societies
Malthusian Theory purpose
Attempts to explain the relationship between people and resources
Malthusian theory creator, time, work
Thomas Malthaus, 1789, Essay on the Principle of the Population
Malthusian theory simple idea
Population growth is geometric, food supply/resource growth is arithmetic; there will eventually be an imbalance that will lead to food shortage
Malthusian theory complex idea
If the population grows faster than before, but food production remains the same, the same food will have to be divided by a larger number of people
Consequences: food prices go up, wages go down: people have to work more for less food
Checks, types of checks
Methods to limit population growth
Positive checks: increase the mortality rate: famine, diseases, wars
Preventive checks: decrease the fertility rate: delayed marriage, chastity
Escape of the Malthusian trap, reasons
By England in the 18th century, due to modernization of agriculture and the Industrial Revolution
Context of Black Death
Brought to Europe around 1346-1347 due to the eased exchange of goods/knowledge/pathogens caused by Pax Mongolica. Mongol Empire, largest contiguous in history
Black Death role as accelerator
Exogenous economic and demographic shock, accelerated development of pre-industrial societies in Europe
Black Death pros and cons
Pros: dicreased pressure on natural resources; greater availability of land; increased social mobility and lower inequality; increase in living standards
Cons: slowdown of production system; decrease of international/supra-regional trade; demographic decline and loss of human capital (30-60% of Europe)