Explanations of ethnic differences in offending

0.0(0)
Studied by 3 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards

History of EM criminality — 1950-70s

  • ↑ EM migration

    • Accepted that ↓ EM criminality than White


2
New cards

History of EM criminality — 1970s

  •  ↑ 👮-Afro Caribbean conflict, street crime arrests → ‘Black criminality’ seen as problem


3
New cards

History of EM criminality — 1990s and early 2000s

  • 1990s – media perpetuated concerns about ↑ ‘Asian gangs’

  • 2001 – 9/11 and Asian youth-👮 clashes up North

    • ☪ and Asian people seen as ‘enemy w/in’


4
New cards

Left realism — reason for EM crime

  • Racism → marginalisation, economic exclusion and relative deprivation


5
New cards

LR — Lea and Young (1993) — EM response to racism

  • EM respond to issues by forming subcultures → utilitarian crime (e.g. to solve relative deprivation)

    • Marginalisation of these groups → non-utilitarian crime


6
New cards

LR — statistical difference

  • 👮 = racist, but doesn’t fully explain


7
New cards

% of crimes known to 👮 that are reported by the public

90%

8
New cards

LR — reason 👮 racism ≠ only explanation of statistical differences

  • Black people commit ↑ crime than Asian people

    • 👮 can’t be that selective in their racism


9
New cards

CRITICISM of LR

  • 👮 may stereotype groups differently, not just be racist to Black people (e.g. seeing Asian people as passive)

    • Now asian people are viewed as criminals post-9/11


10
New cards

Neomarxism (marxism + labelling theory) — Gilroy (1982)

  • EM crime = same resistance as seen against imperialism, this time against racist society


11
New cards

3 CRITICISMS of Gilroy — Lea and Young

  1. 1st gen immigrants were law-abiding so unlikely to have passed down anti-colonial struggle tradition to offspring

  2. Most crime = intra-ethnic, so not a struggle against racism

  3. Romanticises street crime as revolutionary


12
New cards

Neo-marxism — Hall et al (1979) — muggers moral panic

  • 1970s muggers moral panic served interests of capitalism

    • Crisis meant ruling classes needed to use control to prevent ↑ opposition to capitalism

    • Needed something to make this legitimate

    • Created mugging moral panic – new name for same phenomenon that hadn’t even increased

    • Used ‘Black muggers’ as scapegoat to racially divide W/C and therefore reduce opposition to capitalism 

    • Crisis had also marginalised Black youth through unemployment and so ↑ utilitarian crime


13
New cards

CRITICISM of Hall et al — Downes and Rock (2011)

  • Inconsistency - Black street crime wasn’t rising it was just the media creating a moral panic, but it also was because of unemployment?


14
New cards

CRITICISM of Hall et al

  • No evidence of how capitalist crisis → moral panic


15
New cards

CRITICISM of Hall et al — LR

  • Inner-city residents’ fears about mugging are realistic


16
New cards

Sharp and Budd (2005)

  • Getting caught

  • Black offenders ↑ likely to be arrested due to ↑ visibility to authorities:

    • Committing crimes where victims can ID them like robbery

    • Have been excluded from 🏫

    • Associating with known criminals


17
New cards

Fitzgerald et al (2003)

  • Neighbourhood

  • Crime rates highest in:

    • Poor areas

    • Poor and rich contrast areas

  • Young Black people ↑ likely to live in these areas due to discrimination in housing and job markets

  • All ethnicities ↑ likely to commit crimes if living in these areas