1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
group
3 or more people connected through social relationships
> allows for more complex social interactions not seen in dyads
> help us meet our basic, and psychological needs
dyads
2 people connected by social relationships
entativity
the degree to which a group of people appears as a cohesive entity
> including visual attributes (similarity, proximity, synchonity), and structural features (interaction, shared goals, interdependence)
visual elements of entativity
proximity (physically), similarity (visually), common fate (synchony)
structural elements of entativity
interaction (communication and working together), shared goals (the group all have the same goal), common outcome (the whole group gets the same outcome), importance of the group (memebers value being in the group)
ex. a basketball team
variations in entitativity
loose associations (people at a concert), social categories (gender, nationality), task groups (disband once task is completed; jury), intimacy groups (family, friends)
social facilitation
when performance improves in the presence of others
> more common for simple tasks
social inhibition
when performance worsens in the presence of others
> more common for complex tasks
drive theory
the presence of others creates physiological arousal, which makes the dominant response more likely
dominant response
the most familiar or well-learned response
- if the dominant response is correct = social facilitation
- if the dominant response is incorrect = social inhibition
ex. someone who is bad at public speaking would start to sweat when put in that position
evaluation apprehension
concern about being evaluated by others
> causes physiological arousal, which causes the dominant response