CH 301 Unit 0: Approximations and Percent Error

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key approximation techniques, percent error formulas, and molar mass estimation strategies from the CH 301 Unit 0 review notes.

Last updated 3:26 PM on 9/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

Percent Error Formula

A formula used to estimate error in approximations, defined as % Error=approximation−exact valueexact value×100\text{\% Error} = \frac{\text{approximation} - \text{exact value}}{\text{exact value}} \times 100.

2
New cards

Atomic Mass Rounding

The practice of rounding atomic masses of individual elements to simpler values (such as integers or simple decimals) to quickly estimate a compound's molar mass.

3
New cards

AuF3 Molar Mass Approximation

An estimated calculation of the molar mass of AuF3\text{AuF}_3 using rounded atomic masses (Au≈200\text{Au} \approx 200, F≈20\text{F} \approx 20) to quickly obtain ≈260 g\approx 260\,\text{g}, compared to the exact molar mass of 253.964 g253.964\,\text{g}.

4
New cards

SCl6 Molar Mass Approximations

Calculations of the molar mass of SCl6\text{SCl}_6 demonstrating the trade-off between precision and speed: 244.76 g/mol244.76\,\text{g/mol} (exact), 245 g/mol245\,\text{g/mol} (using 32+6×35.532 + 6 \times 35.5), or 240 g/mol240\,\text{g/mol} (using 30+6×3530 + 6 \times 35).

5
New cards

Carbon Atomic Mass Rounding Error

Rounding Carbon (12.011→1212.011 \rightarrow 12) introduces a higher relative discrepancy error rate (≈0.1%\approx 0.1\%) when rounded to an integer atomic mass compared to elements like Nitrogen, Oxygen, or Fluorine.

6
New cards

Avogadro's Number Approximation Error

Approximating Avogadro's number as 1×10241 \times 10^{24}, which results in an error rate of 66.1%66.1\% (significantly greater than a 10%10\% error threshold).