1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Def. Unemployed (ILO)
1) do not work at the moment
2) are available to work
3) actively looking for work
UI parameters
1) level of benefits
2) duration
3) eligibility conditions
Level of benefits
replacement rate = UI benefits /previous earnings
Eligibility conditions
1) involuntary unemployment
2) previous work history
3) availability for work, job search
Can UI be handled without state intervention (free market) - 4 Conditions
1) Independent risks = ?
2) Probability less than 1 = yes
3) P known or estimable = yes
4) No adverse selection = no
5) no moral hazard = no
Adverse selection for Unemployment Insurance
Possible Solution
insurer could require information on previous employment record but imperfect
Adverse selection UI - Individuals
1) People with a stronger preference for leisure
2) People who know they will lose their job
Solution for Adverse selection UI
making UI mandatory
Moral hazard in UI - insured person
1) not put enough effort in keeping job
2) not enough effort in finding a job
Moral hazard in UI - employer
not put enough effort in avoiding lay-offs
Solution for moral hazard in UI for insured person
1) eligibility criteria
2) Job search requirements
Solution for moral hazard in UI for employer
experience rating
UI Redistribution
risks are distributed unequally over workers
UI insurance - equity concerns
more redistribution than risk-sharing
Key trade-off UI
insurance vs incentives
optimal drop in consumption (formula)
Incentive effect of UI divided by risk aversion
Incentive effect of UI
What is the influence of the UI system on unemployment duration
= empirical question
Risk aversion in Unemployment insurance
value of insurance
= normative or empirical question
Value of unemployment insurance for individual
willingness to substitute between income when employed and when unemployed
Value of unemployment insurance for society
willingness to redistribute from low-risk to high-risk groups, from high incomes to low incomes
Value of unemployment insurance for society - type of question
How much more do we value additional income for poorer vs. for richer households?
= Normative question
Value of unemployment insurance for individual - type of question
How much do people value insurance?
= Empirical question
Why is there unemployment - static labor market model
cannot explain involuntary unemployment
Alternative theory to explain unemployment
Job search theory
Job search theory
it takes time to find a job
= frictional unemployment
Job search theory - trade off for unemployed person
expected value of taking the job VS remaining unemployed
Influences on probability of unemployment
1) Job arrival rate
2) Job acceptance rate
What affects the Job arrival rate
1) search efforts
2) Business cycle, state of the labor market
What affects Jobs acceptance rate
1) reservation wage
2) wage distribution of job offers
What affects both search effort and the reservation wage
benefit level and duration (negative and positive, respectively)
Effect of benefit level in theory (both channels)
higher benefit level >
1) higher reservation wage = lower job acceptance
2) lower search effect = lower job arrival rate
Effect of benefit level in theory (short)
individuals stay unemployed longer
Effect of benefit entitlement period in theory
as UI benefits proceed over time, higher risk of benefits exhaustion
Effect of benefit entitlement period in theory (two channels)
1) as benefits decrease = reservation wage decreases = higher job acceptance rate
2) shorter duration = higher search efforts = higher jobs arrival rates
UI and recessions
less jobs
= less moral hazard, more insurance needed
= Search externalities
How to measure effects of UI
1) looking at two key parameters
2) cross-sectional or natural experiments
In theory - generous UI means ..
1) longer unemployment spells
= better job matches = better job quality
= more skill depreciation = worse job quality
In empirical world - generous UI …
not clear if better job matches trumps less skill depreciation
Spike effects in unemployment insurance
at the end of benefit entitlement, large increase in share of people who leave UI
Spikes and Job search theory
= cannot be explained by job search
theoretically should be smooth dropping out rather than a bunch at once
Potential reasons for spikes
1) Hyperbolic discounting (procrastination)
2) timing new contract at the moment of benefit exhaustion
3) are people dropping out of labor force entirely
Measuring willingness to pay for UI
not possible since participation is mandatory
Types of Active Labor Market Policies
1) Training
2) Subsidized employment
3) Public employment services
4) Activation
Subsidised employment
1) Wage subsidies to employers
2) Direct public employment
What are ALMPs for?
1) Enhance worker productivity
2) Bridge the productivity gap
3) Improve job matches
4) Promote active job search behaviour, test availability for work
AMLP - Enhance worker productivity
1) Lack of access to credit to finance re-training
2) positive externalities of retraining
ALMP - Bridge the productivity gap
Positive externalities of employment
ALMP - Promote active job search behaviour
provide incentives through other channel than benefits
Less desirable effects of ALMPs
1) Lock-in effect
2) Crowding out of jobs or other job seekers
Effects of ALMPs on employment
more positive effects during recessions