Factors that affect party success

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/51

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

52 Terms

1
New cards

6 factors that affect party success

  1. Leadership

  2. Unity

  3. Media

  4. Events

  5. Policy

  6. Opposition


2
New cards

Importance of leaders

  1. Potential PM!

  2. Public face of the party for the electorate


3
New cards

5 qualities needed by leaders

  • Effective communication of the party’s message

  • Ability to unite the party

  • Clear sense of purpose

  • Vision

  • Ensure party efficacy when in power/opposition


4
New cards

6 qualities voters look for in a leader

  • Experience

  • Decisiveness

  • Ability to lead (duh)

  • Media image

  • Intelligence

  • Apparent honesty


5
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - Margaret Thatcher

  • Ran the country with an iron fist, held strong to her New Right values


6
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - Tony Blair

  • Changed the fate of L by creating ‘New Labour’

  • Had an excellent media presence

  • Maintained tight control over party messaging

  • Won 3 GEs

    • Saw off 4 Tory leaders

  • Reformed Clause IV of the Labour Party constitution on nationalisation to fit his messaging, which remains to this day


7
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - David Cameron

  • Had one of the highest approval ratings of all party leaders during his term at about 4.5

  • 2015 - bought home an unexpected election victory

  • Was the first sitting C to increase the party’s vote share since 1955


<ul><li><p>Had one of the highest approval ratings of all party leaders during his term at about 4.5</p></li><li><p>2015 - bought home an unexpected election victory</p></li><li><p>Was the first sitting C to increase the party’s vote share since 1955</p></li></ul><p></p>
8
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - Nicola Sturgeon 👑

  • Was incredibly impressive in TV debates (and still when she speaks now)

  • Performed amazingly in opinion polls

    • Got into a bit of trouble re. financial mismanagement and her husband


9
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - Nigel Farage

  • Was favourable in debates for UKIP and RUK, gaining a kind of cult of personality

  • Is a master of the media and always ensures his party is constantly in the news (be that TBP or RUK)


10
New cards

Leaders who enhanced their party’s fortunes - Charles Kennedy

  • Was popular and strong, taking LD to their most successful result in 2015


11
New cards

Leaders who’ve damaged the prospects of their party - Tony Blair

  • Made highly controversial decisions because he could due to his personal leadership style

    • 2003 - entered the Iraw War

    • Introduced tuition fees


12
New cards

Leaders who’ve damaged the prospects of their party - David Cameron

  • Ran a party divided by Europe

    • Attempted to manage these divisions through the Brexit ref, but ultimately left a deeply split party in the wake of his resignation that is yet to reconcile


13
New cards

Leaders who’ve damaged the prospects of their party - Gordon Brown

  • Called a voter a bigot while on mic with the Sun (by accident)


14
New cards

Leaders who’ve damaged the prospects of their party - Ed Miliband

  • Ridiculed for his voice and appearance

  • ‘Hell yeah I’m tough enough!’

  • Ate a bacon sandwich incredibly awkwardly


15
New cards

Leaders who’ve damaged the prospects of their party - Nick Clegg

  • Formed a coalition with C and promptly broke a manifesto promise - raised tuition fees


16
New cards

2010-2019 - increasing significance of leaders

  • Although leaders don’t win or lose elections in the UK like they do in the USA, the fortunes of their parties are influenced by their performance and image

    • Incl in devolved assemblies


17
New cards

Importance of unity in the fate of political parties

  • Political commentators say a disunited party has no hope of being elected

  • Divided parties appear weak, unable to lead and deliver policy promises

  • Divisions prevent parties from focusing on the key issues of the day

  • This is especially the case when the leadership is at war with its members (e.g. Corybn and the MPs)


18
New cards

1980s - Conservative unity

  • C was united around Thatcher

    • Two huge GE victories - 1983 and 1987


19
New cards

1980s - Labour divisions

  • Was incredibly split between left and right wings - modernising or maintaining its old Labour principles

    • 1981 - actually split

      • Suffered 2 crushing GE defeats


20
New cards

Late 1990s - Labour unity

  • Blair united L in the 90s under the banner of New Labour

    • Had an incredibly impressive GE victory in 1997


21
New cards

Late 1990s - Conservative division

  • C divided under Major re. UK’s position in Europe

    • Suffered a crushing election defeat in 1997


22
New cards

2010-2017 - Conservative division

  • Huge divisions re Europe

  • Still emerged as the largest party in the HoC across 3 elections


23
New cards

2017 - Labour comeback

  • Radical new manifesto and leadership led to an improvement in its fortunes, but still didn’t win


24
New cards

2019 - Conservative unity

  • C united around Getting Brexit Done

    • BoJo suspended all moderate Tories from the party

      • Mandated all candidates to sign a pledge to ‘get Brexit done’ 


25
New cards

2019 - Labour divisions

  • Divided over

    • Brexit

    • Antisemitism

    • Its radical manifesto


26
New cards

Conclusion

  • Unity is an important factor, but divided parties are still elected from time to time


27
New cards

Importance of media

  • Shapes perceptions in the wider public

    • Better media presence = easier to project the party message to the public → more votes!

  • Sways wavering voters


28
New cards

Blair and the media

  • Blair had excellent media skills

  • L ‘courted’ owners of the print media

    • Sun switched its alliance from C to L


29
New cards

2017 - Labour media strategy

  • Social media

    • Impacted the election result positively for L


30
New cards

Strengths of the media - party leader exposure

  • TV debates can give excellent exposure to party leaders, as detailed below


31
New cards

Weaknesses of the media - doesn’t guarantee success

  • L did not win in 2017

  • May (C) had strong printed media support in 2017 but didn’t get a majority


32
New cards

Weaknesses of the media - existing affiliations

  • Media reinforces existing political affiliations rather than changing minds

    • +ive correlation between political views of readership and of newspaper


33
New cards

Weaknesses of the media - actual influence (2017)

  • Vast majority of UK newspapers supported C (because of their owners) but C actually lost its HoC majority

  • Corbyn wasn’t supported by print media but still did well, and was supported by non-trad media but still lost


34
New cards

Weaknesses of the media - neutrality

  • TV and radio broadcasters (especially the BBC and ITV) have to be neutral

    • This is by law and regulated by OFCOM


35
New cards

Nick Clegg & the media

  • Did v well in TV debates, leading to Cleggmania

    • Led to the LD/C coalition


36
New cards

Ed Miliband & the media

  • Performed badly in TV debates

    • Led to L losing the election

  • Also: was very awkward and got photographed/videoed doing silly things and looking silly


37
New cards

Jeremy Corbyn & the media

  • Performed surprisingly well in TV debates

  • Embraced all forms of media, especially social media

  • Was negatively viewed by all print newspapers but still did well in the election


38
New cards

Theresa May & the media

  • Refused to participate in televised debates

    • Perceived negatively by the media


39
New cards

Positive consequences of social media

  • Politicians can talk directly to the electorate

  • Bypasses rules about media coverage that some may find excessively restrictive

  • Decreases influence of traditional media outlets that favour certain narratives and perspectives


40
New cards

Negative consequences of social media

  • Difficult to control

  • Difficult to measure/quantify effects and importance

  • Can be used in intrusive and forceful ways

    • Often ethically dubious

      • E.g. Cambridge Analytica and Facebook data

  • Acts as an echo chamber like print media, so people’s ideas are never challenged


41
New cards

Conclusion

  • Influential long-term

  • Can have less influence short-term


42
New cards

Policy explanation

  • Both in manifesto commitments and then delivery while in office


43
New cards

Thatcher - important policy

  • ‘Right to buy’

    • Allowed W/C people to buy their council house at a discount to own their own home (and therefore improve circumstances)

  • V popular, allowed C to dominate elections


44
New cards

Johnson - important policy

  • ‘Get Brexit Done’

    • Contrary to L’s position of re-negotiation and a new referendum

  • Led to soaring polls and an election victory


45
New cards

1992 - Labour

  • Held an internal policy review and moved to a more moderate policy programme

    • Still didn’t win due to

      • Leadership: doubts about Kinnock

      • Media: newspapers whipped up the doubts about Kinnock


46
New cards

1983 - Falklands War

  • Ended in victory, cementing Thatcher’s image as the Iron Lady

    • Allowed her to then conclusively win the 1983 election


47
New cards

1992 - Black Wednesday

  • Damaged Major’s financial reputation

    • Led to C defeat in 1997


48
New cards

2008 - financial crisis

  • Damaged Brown’s financial reputation

    • Led to L defeat in 2010


49
New cards

2003 - Iraq

  • Blair seriously messed up with Iraq (and also had lots of backbench rebellions) yet still comfortably won the 2005 election


50
New cards

Blair

  • C was weak during his reign due to infighting re Europe and Thatcherism

  • Leaders: Hague, Duncan-Smith

    • Unable to cut through to wider public

  • Allowed him to sail through on large majorities, easily winning GEs


51
New cards

1992

  • C had lots of issues

    • Division over Europe

    • Terrible Poll Tax

    • Inexperienced new leader (Major from Thatcher)

  • Yet still won a 21-seat majority


52
New cards

2024

  • C was an incredibly weak opposition, damaged by terrible leaders and terrible decisions

  • Made it easy for L to win a large majority