Introduction to Science vs. Pseudoscience and Evidence Evaluation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering basic scientific principles, the evidence hierarchy, the Bradford Hill Criteria for causation, science literacy, and the differences between science and pseudoscience.

22 Terms

1
New cards

Evidence based

A practice or approach grounded in strong research evidence.

2
New cards

Evidence informed

An approach that integrates research evidence with individual needs and context.

3
New cards

Replicability

A core scientific principle where a study can be conducted again and produce the same results.

4
New cards

Meta Analysis

A method on the pyramid of evidence that compiles multiple studies and statistically analyzes their statistics and relationships.

5
New cards

Systematic Review

A study design that identifies and evaluates research addressing a specific question.

6
New cards

Randomized Controlled Trials

Experimental study designs involving intervention groups and comparison groups.

7
New cards

Cohort Studies

Observational studies that involve following a group over a period of time.

8
New cards

Case Control Studies

Observational studies that compare individuals with specific outcomes to those without outcomes.

9
New cards

Case Series / Case Reports

Descriptive evidence based on clinical experiences.

10
New cards

Bradford Hill Criteria

A framework of nine considerations used to evaluate whether an observed association reflects a true causal relationship where one thing contributes to producing another.

11
New cards

Strength (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration assessing how large the association is between exposure and outcome.

12
New cards

Consistency (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration checking whether results repeat across different studies and areas rather than being an isolated occurrence.

13
New cards

Specificity (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration looking for a very specific association between a factor and an effect.

14
New cards

Temporality (Bradford Hill Criteria)

The essential requirement that exposure must occur prior to the outcome; causation is not possible unless this condition is met regardless of other criteria.

15
New cards

Biological gradient (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration evaluating whether a greater exposure leads to a greater effect.

16
New cards

Plausibility (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration examining whether there is a reasonable biological mechanism explaining the relationship.

17
New cards

Coherence (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration evaluating whether findings align with and exist within existing scientific knowledge.

18
New cards

Experiment (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration testing whether changing or removing the exposure alters the outcome.

19
New cards

Analogy (Bradford Hill Criteria)

A consideration assessing whether similar causal relationships are already known and recognized.

20
New cards

Science literacy

The capacity to comprehend, evaluate, and apply scientific information to engage effectively and make choices regarding health and wellness, public policy, and global challenges.

21
New cards

Science

A discipline characterized by empirical evidence, methodology, peer review, falsifiability, consensus, progress, repeatability, and critical thinking.

22
New cards

Pseudoscience

Claims and practices presented as scientific without adhering to scientific standards; characterized by lack of peer review, biased points of view, absence of testing, lack of repeatability, persuasive presentation, and unfalsifiability.