1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Eligibility
Broad coverage vs. targeting those in need
Benefits
cash flexibility vs. particular goods/services
Generosity
Adequacy vs Cost
Delivery
Public accountability vs. private/nonprofit providers
Funding
progressive taxes vs. feasibility (degree of being easily achieved, can it be done)
Tradeoffs effect…
equity, efficiency, complexity, support
How can welfare programs vary (form of benefit)
money
in-kind googs and services (food, housing, childcare)
Regulation and protection (minimum wage, mandated, vacations)
Employer-provider benefits (mandates and subsidies)
How can welfare programs vary (Generosity)
Cash benefits-replacement rates, subsistence, poverty line, median income, prevailing wage, waiting period, progessivity
services - quality, availability, wait times, choice of providers
How can welfare programs vary (Eligibility)
universal or selected (income testing)
immigrants (authorized or not)
Strictness of eligibility testing (medical certification pay stubs, tax forms, frequency
Poltical Barriers and Stratagies (universalism)
universalism is a baseline support net for all citizens and it is a given right
increases public support and generosity
less racialization of programs
allows hidden redistribution if benefits of taxes are progressive
Poltical Barriers and Stratagies (targeting)
Usually targets low income, discriminated, or groups affected by inequality
less expensive, only for the needy (Not Bill Gates)
Targeting with Universalism
Universalism provides foundation for selection
targeting is less visible
universalism promotes sense of community, socially approved agencies, rights discourse
Putting Politics First
When making a policy one should account
for political approval and disproval and who will be affected by the policy
second focus on efficiency
ACA strategy: Putting Politics First
Employer mandate: Insured keep current plan, reduces need for new taxes
medicaid expansion: reduces need for new taxes (states pay part, cheaper than subsidies)
individual mandate - reduces insurer opposition
no deficit spending
Policy Feedbacks
Political outcome of a policy
public opinion (GI Bill)
interest groups (Medicare AARP Old People, Wagner Act → labor unions)
government capacity: regulatory and administrative tools that enable ftuure reform (pollution permits → cap-and-trade readiness)
State Variation: States with administrative capacities (climate) adopt stronger policies
aca: complexity and benefits for relatively small part of population
obama tax cuts: invisible payroll benefits
welfare reform: fragmented low-income advocated by moving to states
Marginalized Groups and the Welfare State (Inequality)
Women
Wage gap (wider for wpoc)
earnings-based pensions and employer-provided benefits reinforce it
Higher poverty and homelessness, especially single mothers, weak aid aid to poor, unaffordable housing
Unpaid family leave, no family allowances, little childcare support
Limited access to abortion and contraception
main beneficiaries of ss but mainly as dependents (spousal benefits)
Sweden
Strong poverty reduction, strong aid to single mothers
universal pensions reduce wage disparities
High child support
Weakness
Labor-market policies aimed at men
extensive occupation segregation
Women stereotyped as less attached to labor force, employers discriminate
spread of part-time work for family, increases involuntary part-time work
LGBTQ People
higher rates of poverty, food insecurity, uninsurance, unemployment, housing insecurity
receive supplemental nutrition assistance program and medicaid at high rates
Income distribution
one percent of population holds one third of the wealth
causes for income inequality
30% CEO and Wall street compensation
30% education failure - skilled workers, increasing demand, declining supply
20% Decline of unions
10% trade with low-wage countries
5% tax policy
5% immigration
basically the cis white man dominate all income percentages
Black Americans
racialization of means-tested programs
Brown reading
Discrimination in labor, housing, education, unions
black people forced to accept public relief as one of “major occupations”
black people stigmatized for welfare receipt
Residential Segregation
Redlining - black people largely excluded from federal mortgage loan guarantees until 1970s, aided white suburbanization
Homes in white suburbs appreciate, homes in black ghettos depreciate, gov’t subsidizes white wealth creation
continued housing discrimination and income segregation
Segregation Effects
Lack of good schools, churches, playgrounds, childcare - harder for parents to raise kids
fewer political allies - harder to get public resources for schools and attract business investment
Weaker social networks and community organizations reduces neighbors’ willingness to supervise young, increases crime
disconnection from networks of employed people
people associate ghettos with crime, housing decay, falling real estate prices