Digital Divide Week 11

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

When do individual psychological differences become inequality?

when they are shaped by conditions people didn’t choose (earlier experiences, service design), are unevenly spread across groups/situations and it changes what people can do/get

2
New cards

What are the four questions every consumer asks?

  1. Motivation: Do I want to?

  2. Control: Can I?

  3. Trust: Can I rely on it?

  4. Emotion: How does it feel?


3
New cards

What is motivation about?

entry point for digital participation, wanting to engage with digital services

> perceived irrelevance instead of incompetence (not wanting to use AI even tho you know how to use it)

4
New cards

What is the expetancy-value model of motivation?

 Motivation is dependent on the expected success + the value of the outcome

<p><span style="font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; line-height: 107%;">&nbsp;Motivation is dependent on the expected success + the value of the outcome</span></p>
5
New cards

What is meant my expectancy?

“Can I do it”?

  • ability beliefs: current ability, do I think I’m capable of booking the flight

  • expectation of success: future performance of the task


6
New cards

What is meant by value?

“Do I want to do it? Is it worth it?”

  • attainment value: personal identity/goals

  • intrinsic value: is there value in completing the task? is it fun/enjoyable/interesting?

  • utility value: does it save time/costs, allows you to use new features

  • cost: effort, time, opportunity costs, making you feel stressed/anxious


7
New cards

What is the technology acceptance model?

perceived usefulness + ease of use > behavioral intention > actual use

8
New cards

What is the theory of planned behavior?

  • Attitude: overall evaluation of the act

  • Subjective norm: perceived social pressure from close social network

  • perceived behavioral control: perceived ease/difficulty of activity


<ul><li><p><span>Attitude: overall evaluation of the act</span></p></li><li><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><span>Subjective norm: perceived social pressure from close social network</span></p></li><li><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><span>perceived behavioral control: perceived ease/difficulty of activity</span></p></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

How can motivation be a self-reinforcing cycle?

  • + confidence: early success → positive expectancy → more use + practice → higher perceived competence

  • - confidence: early failure→ avoidance → less use + practice → lower perceived competence


10
New cards

What is “perceived control”?

= belief that you can influence/manage outcomes through your own actions/choices

11
New cards

What is the difference between high and low perceived control?

  • high perceived control: view setbacks as manageable, continue learning + solving problems

  • low perceived control: view setbacks as threats, leading to avoidance + withdrawal


12
New cards

What is learned helplessness?

develops through repeated experiences!! of uncontrollable outcomes -> “my actions don’t matter”

13
New cards

What is self-efficacy? Explain the difference between strong + weak self-efficacy!

belief in your own ability to perform specific actions!

  • strong self-efficacy: persistence, experimentation, problem-solving

  • weak self-efficacy: avoidance, anxiety, dependence on others


14
New cards

What are some sources of self-efficacy?

  • successfully competing tasks (first transfer that goes through)

  • watching others succeed (vicarious learning → seeing a friend use the app)

  • reassurance from others (“You can’t break it, I’m here!”)

  • physiological/emotional states (feeling calm, not rushed when trying)


<ul><li><p>successfully competing tasks (first transfer that goes through) </p></li><li><p>watching others succeed (vicarious learning → seeing a friend use the app) </p></li><li><p>reassurance from others (“You can’t break it, I’m here!”)</p></li><li><p>physiological/emotional states (feeling calm, not rushed when trying)</p></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

What is the “locus of control”?

whether individuals think outcomes are because of internal forces (own actions) or external forces (factors beyond my control: systems, luck, other people)

“Do my own or others’ actions matter more?

16
New cards

What are the four components of the “Psychological empowerment” framework?

  • meaning: belief that one’s engagement has purpose (is this worth my time?)

  • competence: self-perceived capability to perform (Can I do this?)

  • self-determination: autonomy in choosing how to engage (Can I choose how to use it → forced or voluntary action)

  • impact: sense that actions produce visible outcomes (Does what I do make a difference?)


17
New cards

How does self-efficiacy, locus of control + perceived control (+ …) lead to empowerment?

OVERALL: self-efficacy + locus of control (control beliefs) = perceived control, repeated experiences of that leads to empowerment

18
New cards

What is trust about?

= willingness to be vulnerable with other people’s actions (these actions will do something important to you and you are not able to monitor/control it)

> turns uncertainty into willingness to act (you never have the full information so this helps you move forward faster) > e.g. agreeing to cookies/scanning payment QR-codes

19
New cards

How can you build/lose trust?

  • +design clarity/consistency (predictability + control)

  • +peer experience/social proof (familiarity + comfort)

  • -media scandals/data breaches


20
New cards

What is “institution-based trust”?

perception that surrounding environment makes it safe enough to act

  • structural assurance: laws, standards → belief that safeguards make the environment safe (system is built to protect me)

  • situational normality: interactions (e.g. SKKU website) feel predictable + orderly (nothing seems suspicious here)


<p><span>perception that surrounding environment makes it safe enough to act</span></p><ul><li><p>structural assurance: laws, standards → belief that safeguards make the environment safe (system is built to protect me)</p></li><li><p>situational normality: interactions (e.g. SKKU website) feel predictable + orderly (nothing seems suspicious here)</p></li></ul><p></p>
21
New cards

How can you rebuild trust and on which levels?

  • design level: transparency and reversibility (going back to the original state of the service), clear data-use explanations

  • institutional level

    • independent certification (“I am the best company” is less credible when it comes from the company compared to when it comes from the government for example)

    • national privacy laws (finance- and health-related data) + security audits


22
New cards

What is the affect heuristic?

=mental shortcut where people judge risk/benefits of an action by relying on your current emotional reaction (good/bad feelings)

23
New cards

What is the difference between a positive and a negative affect?

positive: lower perceived risk/higher perceived benefit → underestimated risk when service feels safe

negative: higher perceived risk/lower perceived benefit → overestimated risk/danger when service feels unfamiliar

24
New cards

What is technostress?

= stress related to the use of information + communication technologies (+ exhaustion, less satisfaction, digital withdrawal) > emotional cost + digital fatigue, stress accumulates and builds up (loop)

> emotional burden, digital fatigue, feeling of safety differs from person to person/conditions

25
New cards

What implications does this have on a individual and a societal level?

Individual level: psychological barriers contribute to reduced participation, learned helplessness reinforces avoidance, digital stress + anxiety lowers wellbeing

Societal level: psychological = social exclusion, reduced civic participation, less market access/consumer protection, uneven digital capital distribution