I/O Psychology: Measurement, Statistics, Recruitment, and Validity

0.0(0)
Studied by 3 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/151

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering statistical measurement scales, distribution properties, regression modeling, recruitment strategies, turnover predictors, and test validity concepts in Industrial/Organizational Psychology.

Last updated 12:52 AM on 10/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

152 Terms

1
New cards

Measurement

The assignment of numbers to properties of objects or events, reflecting specific quantifiable aspects rather than the entire entity itself.

2
New cards

Construct (Latent Variable)

An unobservable psychological concept or attribute (symbolized by circles) assumed to cause variation in observable indicators.

3
New cards

Indicator (Manifest Variable)

An observable, measurable variable (symbolized by squares), such as a survey response score, designed to assess an underlying latent construct.

4
New cards

Nominal Scale

A measurement scale that classifies data into mutually exclusive qualitative categories without any inherent quantitative order (e.g., gender or race).

5
New cards

Ordinal Scale

A measurement scale where numbers reflect rank-ordering (e.g., performance rankings), but intervals between adjacent ranks are unknown or unequal.

6
New cards

Interval Scale

A measurement scale where distances between values are known, equal, and meaningful (permitting addition and subtraction), but without an absolute zero point.

7
New cards

Ratio Scale

A measurement scale featuring equal intervals and an absolute, meaningful zero point, allowing values to be expressed as multiples or ratios of each other.

8
New cards

Standard Deviation (SD)

A measure of variability representing the square root of variance, calculated as s=∑i=1N(Xi−Xˉ)2N−1s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N} (X_i - \bar{X})^2}{N - 1}}, which describes the spread of data around the mean.

9
New cards
<p>Positive Skew</p>

Positive Skew

An asymmetrical distribution curve stretched toward the right, where the tail points toward higher values and Mean>Median>Mode\text{Mean} > \text{Median} > \text{Mode}.

10
New cards
<p>Negative Skew</p>

Negative Skew

An asymmetrical distribution curve stretched toward the left, where the tail points toward lower values and Mean<Median<Mode\text{Mean} < \text{Median} < \text{Mode}.

11
New cards
<p>Kurtosis</p>

Kurtosis

The degree of peakedness of a distribution, distinguishing sharply peaked curves with heavy tails (leptokurtic) from flatter curves (platykurtic).

12
New cards

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (rr)

A standardized statistic ranging from −1.00-1.00 to +1.00+1.00 that represents the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.

13
New cards

Range Restriction

A condition occurring when the study sample has less variability than the population of interest, which typically reduces the magnitude of observed correlation coefficients.

14
New cards

Simple Linear Regression

A statistical procedure represented by Y=b0+b1X1+eY = b_0 + b_1 X_1 + e, used to predict values of an outcome variable (YY) based on a single predictor variable (X1X_1).

15
New cards

Coefficient of Determination (R2R^2)

The proportion of variance in the outcome variable predictable from the predictor variable(s), calculated as R2=1−Var(e)Var(Y)R^2 = 1 - \frac{Var(e)}{Var(Y)}.

16
New cards

Multiple Linear Regression

A regression model represented by Y=b0+b1X1+b2X2+eY = b_0 + b_1 X_1 + b_2 X_2 + e, estimating the unique contribution of each predictor while holding other predictors constant.

17
New cards

p-value

The probability of obtaining an observed sample result or correlation given that the true relationship between variables in the population is zero under the null hypothesis.

18
New cards

Confidence Interval (CI)

A calculated range of values within which the true population parameter is expected to fall with a specified degree of certainty (typically 95%95\%).

19
New cards

Recruitment

The organizational process of identifying and attracting a qualified pool of potential job applicants.

20
New cards

Time to Hire

A recruitment efficiency metric tracking the average duration in days across milestones from resume submission to formal job start.

21
New cards

Gross Cost per Hire

An efficiency metric calculated as total recruiting expenditures divided by the total number of individuals hired.

22
New cards

Job Embeddedness

The extent to which an employee's job connects to important non-work aspects of life, comprising organizational/community fit, links, and sacrifices.

23
New cards

Job Satisfaction

A multifaceted work attitude reflecting employee evaluations of pay, promotion opportunities, supervision, coworkers, and the work itself.

24
New cards

Affective Commitment

An organizational commitment component characterized by positive emotional attachment and identification with the organization.

25
New cards

Continuance Commitment

An organizational commitment component driven by the perceived heavy economic, social, or psychological costs associated with quitting.

26
New cards

Normative Commitment

An organizational commitment component defined by perceived moral or ethical obligation to remain with the employer.

27
New cards

Closed Internal Recruitment

An internal staffing system where open positions are kept confidential from general employees and revealed solely to candidates selected by HR.

28
New cards

Open Internal Recruitment

An internal staffing procedure where all job openings are publicized to all employees within the organization.

29
New cards
<p>Yield Ratio Funnel</p>

Yield Ratio Funnel

A graphical representation of applicant throughput tracking the percentage of applicants successfully moving between successive recruitment stages.

30
New cards
<p>Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) Model</p>

Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) Model

Benjamin Schneider's framework explaining how organizations naturally become homogeneous because similar people apply, are chosen, and non-fitting members leave.

31
New cards

Realistic Job Preview (RJP)

Recruitment materials or presentations providing candidates with balanced, accurate information highlighting both favorable and unfavorable aspects of a job.

32
New cards

Process Fairness

Applicant perceptions regarding the procedural equity, job relatedness, consistency, and respectfulness of the selection process.

33
New cards

Outcome Fairness

Applicant perceptions concerning the fairness of the final hiring or rejection decision.

34
New cards

Validity

The degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the adequacy and appropriateness of inferences drawn from assessment scores.

35
New cards

Reliability

The consistency and repeatability of test scores across time, raters, or forms; mathematically establishes the upper ceiling for validity.

36
New cards

Content Validity

The extent to which test items accurately represent and theoretically link to the specific behaviors, knowledge, or dimensions required for job performance.

37
New cards

Substantive Validity Coefficient (CSVC_{SV})

An index evaluating content validity: CSV=nc−n0NC_{SV} = \frac{n_c - n_0}{N}, where ncn_c is posited construct assignments and n0n_0 is the highest competing construct assignment.

38
New cards

Criterion-Related Validity

The degree of empirical, statistically significant association between predictor test scores and an outcome measure (such as job performance).

39
New cards

Predictive Validity

A criterion validation design where applicant test scores are gathered prior to hiring and subsequently correlated with performance measured after a tenure period (typically ∼6 months\sim 6\text{ months}).

40
New cards

Concurrent Validity

A criterion validation design in which predictor scores and performance criterion measures are collected simultaneously from current job incumbents.

41
New cards

Correction for Attenuation

A statistical adjustment formula, rXTy=rXYrYYr_{XT_y} = \frac{r_{XY}}{\sqrt{r_{YY}}}

Used to estimate what criterion-related validity would be if the criterion were measured without error.

<p>A statistical adjustment formula, $$r_{XT_y} = \frac{r_{XY}}{\sqrt{r_{YY}}}$$ </p><p>Used to estimate what criterion-related validity would be if the criterion were measured without error.</p>
42
New cards

Situational Specificity Hypothesis

The view that predictor validity varies idiosyncratically across different organizations and settings, largely refuted by validity generalization meta-analyses.

43
New cards

Validity Generalization

A meta-analytic approach developed by Schmidt and Hunter demonstrating that selection test validity generalizes across settings when statistical artifacts are removed.

44
New cards

Construct Validity

Evidence demonstrating that test scores align with theoretical expectations regarding the internal structure of the construct and its relationships with external constructs.

45
New cards

Convergent Validity

The degree to which a new measure correlates strongly (r=.50 to .80r = .50\text{ to }.80) with existing measures assessing the exact same theoretical construct.

  • A new measure of a construct should be strongly correlated with existing measures of the same construct.


46
New cards

Discriminant Validity

The degree to which a test shows lower or non-significant correlations with existing measures of conceptually distinct constructs.

47
New cards

Factor Analysis

A statistical method used to evaluate construct validity by testing whether observed indicators correlate as expected with underlying latent factors.

48
New cards

Factor Loading

The standardized regression coefficient linking a latent factor to an observed indicator, with ideal values typically falling between 0.400.40 and 0.800.80.

49
New cards
<p>Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix (MTMM)</p>

Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix (MTMM)

A Campbell and Fiske framework measuring multiple traits using multiple methods to isolate construct variance from common method bias.

50
New cards

Consequential Validity

The assessment of both intended consequences (e.g., hiring top performers) and unintended consequences (e.g., adverse impact) of test use.

51
New cards

Utility Analysis

The process of translating selection validity coefficients and performance gains into direct bottom-line dollar revenue value for an organization.

52
New cards
<p>Taylor-Russell Approach</p>

Taylor-Russell Approach

A selection model predicting the proportion of successful hires using a test, based on the validity coefficient, selection ratio, and base rate.

53
New cards

Selection Ratio

The mathematical proportion of total applicants hired for a job opening relative to the total applicant pool size.

54
New cards

Base Rate

The proportion of applicants who would perform adequately on the job if hiring decisions were made entirely at random.

55
New cards
Nominal Data Operations
For nominal data, it only makes sense to compute percentages in each category, not means or standard deviations because category order is arbitrary.
56
New cards
Minimum Scale for Statistics
You need at least an interval scale to compute means, standard deviations, and correlations.
57
New cards
Zero Correlation vs. Independence
Zero correlation does not imply independence
58
New cards
Correlation Magnitude vs. Importance
Correlation magnitude does not necessarily equal level of importance (e.g., small medical correlations like aspirin use and heart attack can be critically important).
59
New cards
Cost of a Bad Hire
A single bad hire costs companies an average of $14,900, amounting to roughly 30 percent of the hire's annual salary.
60
New cards
New Hire Break-Even Timeline
It generally takes at least 6 months for companies to break even on new hires.
61
New cards
Internal vs. External Hires (Bidwell 2011)
External hires have more education/experience and higher starting pay, but internal hires perform at a higher level and experience lower turnover.
62
New cards
External Recruitment Sources Rule of Thumb
Informal sources (such as employee referrals) typically outperform formal recruitment methods.
63
New cards
Pay-to-Quit Programs
A retention strategy used by companies that relies on cognitive dissonance.
64
New cards
Standard Corporate Hiring Yield Ratios
Corporate hiring funnels average a 14:1 resume-to-serious-candidate ratio, a 4:1 serious-candidate-to-interview ratio, and a 5:2 interview-to-hire ratio.
65
New cards
Rule for Describing Validity
We should never say a test is globally valid or invalid
66
New cards
Why Validity Matters
It ensures a test measures what it is supposed to, test scores relate to other variables in predictable ways, and test scores are reliable.
67
New cards
Validity Degradation
The validity of test scores drops as the time interval between testing and performance evaluation increases.
68
New cards
Test Motivation in Validation
Job incumbents in concurrent validation studies may not approach tests with the same anxiety or motivation as real job applicants.
69
New cards
Discriminant Validity (Similar Constructs)
A new measure should be moderately correlated (r=.30r = .30 to .50.50) with similar constructs (e.g., job satisfaction and organizational commitment).
70
New cards
Discriminant Validity (Unrelated Constructs)
A new measure should be weakly correlated (r=0r = 0 to .30.30) with unrelated constructs (e.g., job satisfaction and political beliefs).
71
New cards
IQ Score Scale Limitation
IQ scores are measured on an interval scale, which is why it is incorrect to say an IQ of 200 is twice as intelligent as an IQ of 100 because it lacks an absolute, meaningful zero point.
72
New cards
Normal Distribution Percentile
In a normal distribution, a person who is one standard deviation above the mean falls above approximately 84 percent of the people in the sample.
73
New cards
Multiple Regression Interpretation
In multiple regression, the slopes represent the unique contribution of each predictor while holding the other predictors constant.
74
New cards
Big Five Correlations with Job Satisfaction

Job satisfaction correlates with Neuroticism (r = -.29), Conscientiousness (r = .26), Extraversion (r = .25), and Agreeableness (r = .17).

75
New cards
Fit Types and Job Satisfaction Ranking

Person-job fit has the strongest relationship with job satisfaction (r = .56), followed by person-organization and person-supervisor (r = .44).

76
New cards
Job Satisfaction vs. Turnover Intention

Job satisfaction correlates more strongly with turnover intention (r = -.58) than with actual turnover (r = -.22).

77
New cards
Job Embeddedness Subfactors
Comprises fit, links, and sacrifice, evaluated across both community and organization domains.
78
New cards
Reliability Ceiling on Validity
Reliability places a hard ceiling on validity, meaning validity cannot exceed reliability.
79
New cards

Taylor-Russell Inputs

The validity coefficient, the selection ratio, and the base rate.

80
New cards
Predictor
Any manifest measure whose scores represent individual differences on latent knowledge, skills, abilities, or other characteristics linked to effective criterion performance, and which is used as the basis for selection or promotion.
81
New cards
Model of Predictor Response Process
A framework illustrating how latent individual differences, contaminating sources of variance, and test-taking motivation interact during comprehension to produce a response.
82
New cards
Constructs vs. Measurement Methods
A comparison framework looking at how different underlying traits are assessed using various measurement formats.
83
New cards
Psychological Fidelity
The extent to which a predictor taps into the same KSAOs required for criterion performance, which is considered more important than physical similarity.
84
New cards
Physical Fidelity
The extent to which a predictor is physically similar to the criterion, roughly corresponding to the measurement methods used.
85
New cards
Proximal Predictors
Predictors that assess KSAOs most directly related to performance and are more state-like constructs such as motivation and job knowledge.
86
New cards
Distal Predictors
Predictors related to criterion performance but not as immediately, consisting of more stable, trait-like individual differences such as general intelligence and personality.
87
New cards
Four Main Considerations for a Good Predictor
Criterion-related validity, user acceptability, utility, and subgroup differences.
88
New cards
Subgroup Differences
Mean predictor score disparities between demographic categories.
89
New cards
Cohen's d
The standardized effect size calculated as the majority group mean minus the minority group mean divided by the pooled standard deviation.
90
New cards
Cohen's d Effect Size Benchmarks
Small equals 0.20, medium equals 0.50, and large equals 0.80.
91
New cards
Predictor Battery
A selection system consisting of multiple predictors that, when well-developed, always outperforms any single predictor.
92
New cards
Regression-Based Weighting
Combining predictors using regression weights to achieve maximum validity without explicitly considering subgroup differences.
93
New cards
Subjective Weighting
Assigning weights subjectively, which can cause some loss of validity but may help reduce subgroup differences.
94
New cards

Compound Predictors

Variables consisting of multiple traits compounded together yielding a single/composite score, such as emotional intelligence or core self-evaluations.

95
New cards
Pure Top-Down Selection
Ranking all applicants by test scores and selecting from the top down based strictly on the number of open positions.
96
New cards
Cut-Off Scores
Using a regression-derived score threshold where applicants must score above it to be considered.
97
New cards
Multiple Cut-Offs Decision Model
A selection system where applicants take multiple tests and must pass thresholds across all of them, which can be expensive.
98
New cards
99
New cards
Predictors in Multilevel Contexts
Staffing considerations where individual-level KSAOs may not be optimal for group-level staffing, requiring evaluation of whether team homogeneity or heterogeneity impacts performance through team mediating processes like cohesion, mental models, and coordination.
100
New cards
Cultural Influences on Testing
Differences across cultures regarding factor structure (e.g., variations of the Big Five), predictive validity, and user reactions.