LECTURE #3 - Psychology and Police Investigations

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/36

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

37 Terms

1
New cards

how can ip assist the police with their activiites

  • scientific approach

  • research methods

  • understand offenders and police

  • attempts to develop practical strategies


2
New cards

why is crime linkage important

  • pool evidence and resources

  • obtain more severe sentences


3
New cards

different crime linkage scenarios (2)

  • comparative case analysis

  • crime linkage analysis


4
New cards

comparative case analysis

  • large samples of crimes are searched by a practitioner for potential linkages


5
New cards

crime linkage analysis

  • limited crimes are brought to a practitioner; needs to know whether crimes are linked


6
New cards

linking assumptions (2)

  • behavioural stability

  • behavioural distinctiveness


7
New cards

behavioural stability

  • offenders will display similar behaviour across their crimes ( to some degree )


8
New cards

behavioural distinctiveness

  • offenders commiting similar crimes will commit those crimes in a distinctive fashion ( to some degree )


9
New cards

C.A.P.D

  • cognitive affective personality system

  • personality traits and situational factors influence our behaviour

  • behavioural strategies activated by internal fantasy

  • strategy will be consistent


10
New cards

modus operandi

  • method used by an offender to successfully commit a crime and get away with it

  • assumes offenders will exhibit the same behaviours


11
New cards

challenges with MO

  • mo is now always stable

  • offender’s may chamge


12
New cards

behavioural signatures

  • behaviour exhibited

  • not necessary for crime commission

  • satisfy some psychologial/emotional need


13
New cards

linkage databases

  • capture info related to crimes committed across jurisdictions

  • specially trained analysts attempt to identify linkages


14
New cards

challenges with databases

  • data reliability and accuracy

  • consistency and distinctiveness of MO and signatures

  • ability of analysts to identify potential linkages


15
New cards

linkage as a diagnostic task

  • two alternatives (yes-no)

    • discriminate between linked/unlinked crimes

    • evidence is available to assist with the task

    • ambiguous

    • must decide which evidence to use


16
New cards

diagnostic outcomes

  • hit

  • miss

  • false alarm

  • correct rejection


17
New cards

unambiguous

  • occurs only for linked crimes or unlinked crimes


18
New cards

defining useful evidence

  • degree of overlap can be measured using ROC

    • plots hit and false alarm rates as a function of threshold


19
New cards

measuring linkage accuracy

  • measured as the auc

  • higher the auc, the better the evidence is for linking


20
New cards

how good are we at linking crimes

  • hard to tell

  • studies used different measures of linking accuracy


21
New cards

what behaviours are most useful for linkage purposes

  • those determined by the offender


22
New cards

what behaviours

  • where and when offenders commit their crimes


23
New cards

is it easier to link certain types of crimes

  • linking accuracy is higher for interpersonal crimes


24
New cards

are people good at linking crimes

  • linking crimes is difficult


25
New cards

why is profiling important

  • prioritise suspects


26
New cards

two assumptions underlying the profiling task

  • behavioural stability

  • homology


27
New cards

homology

  • two crimes committed in a similar way, offenders may have similar background characteristics


28
New cards

latent traits

  • assumed to be driving force behind behaviours exhibited in criminal and non-criminal contexts


29
New cards

organized-disorganized model

  • crime scenes will vary from organized to disorganized

  • backgrounds will vary from ‘‘

  • organized crimes→ organized offenders;disorganized crimes → disorganized offenders


30
New cards

profile approaches

  • deductive

  • inductive


31
New cards

deductive profiling

  • profiling background characteristics

  • based onn evidence left at crime scenes


32
New cards

inductive profling

  • profiling characteristics

  • based on what we know about other offenders


33
New cards

IP approach to profiling

  • determine if structure exists in the way offenders commit crime & in their background characteristics

  • identify relationships between actions


34
New cards

are existing profile models valid

  • models have been used without evidence of their validity


35
New cards

are profiling assumptions supported

  • some evidence for stability assumptions

  • no strong evidence for homology


36
New cards

do police think profiling is useful

  • short answers: yes


37
New cards

biggest problem with research

  • ecological validity