1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
how can ip assist the police with their activiites
scientific approach
research methods
understand offenders and police
attempts to develop practical strategies
why is crime linkage important
pool evidence and resources
obtain more severe sentences
different crime linkage scenarios (2)
comparative case analysis
crime linkage analysis
comparative case analysis
large samples of crimes are searched by a practitioner for potential linkages
crime linkage analysis
limited crimes are brought to a practitioner; needs to know whether crimes are linked
linking assumptions (2)
behavioural stability
behavioural distinctiveness
behavioural stability
offenders will display similar behaviour across their crimes ( to some degree )
behavioural distinctiveness
offenders commiting similar crimes will commit those crimes in a distinctive fashion ( to some degree )
C.A.P.D
cognitive affective personality system
personality traits and situational factors influence our behaviour
behavioural strategies activated by internal fantasy
strategy will be consistent
modus operandi
method used by an offender to successfully commit a crime and get away with it
assumes offenders will exhibit the same behaviours
challenges with MO
mo is now always stable
offender’s may chamge
behavioural signatures
behaviour exhibited
not necessary for crime commission
satisfy some psychologial/emotional need
linkage databases
capture info related to crimes committed across jurisdictions
specially trained analysts attempt to identify linkages
challenges with databases
data reliability and accuracy
consistency and distinctiveness of MO and signatures
ability of analysts to identify potential linkages
linkage as a diagnostic task
two alternatives (yes-no)
discriminate between linked/unlinked crimes
evidence is available to assist with the task
ambiguous
must decide which evidence to use
diagnostic outcomes
hit
miss
false alarm
correct rejection
unambiguous
occurs only for linked crimes or unlinked crimes
defining useful evidence
degree of overlap can be measured using ROC
plots hit and false alarm rates as a function of threshold
measuring linkage accuracy
measured as the auc
higher the auc, the better the evidence is for linking
how good are we at linking crimes
hard to tell
studies used different measures of linking accuracy
what behaviours are most useful for linkage purposes
those determined by the offender
what behaviours
where and when offenders commit their crimes
is it easier to link certain types of crimes
linking accuracy is higher for interpersonal crimes
are people good at linking crimes
linking crimes is difficult
why is profiling important
prioritise suspects
two assumptions underlying the profiling task
behavioural stability
homology
homology
two crimes committed in a similar way, offenders may have similar background characteristics
latent traits
assumed to be driving force behind behaviours exhibited in criminal and non-criminal contexts
organized-disorganized model
crime scenes will vary from organized to disorganized
backgrounds will vary from ‘‘
organized crimes→ organized offenders;disorganized crimes → disorganized offenders
profile approaches
deductive
inductive
deductive profiling
profiling background characteristics
based onn evidence left at crime scenes
inductive profling
profiling characteristics
based on what we know about other offenders
IP approach to profiling
determine if structure exists in the way offenders commit crime & in their background characteristics
identify relationships between actions
are existing profile models valid
models have been used without evidence of their validity
are profiling assumptions supported
some evidence for stability assumptions
no strong evidence for homology
do police think profiling is useful
short answers: yes
biggest problem with research
ecological validity