Intro to Homicide

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:31 AM on 9/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

11 Terms

1
New cards

What does State v. Guthrie elucidate?

showing importance of deliberation and premeditation it's not the same intention  

2
New cards

What does Hatfield in relation to deliberation and premediation?

  • Premed thinking about beforehand (quantitative) 

    • Was there any time what was the time 

  • Deliberation cool mind that can reflect (qualitative)  

    • Were you able to think about it  


3
New cards

State v. Guthrie (who wins, statute, phrase that pays, facts)?

  • What's the phrase that pays: "willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing"  

  • What's the statute: the jury instructions: 

    • “The court instructs the jury that to constitute a willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, it is not necessary that the intention to kill should exist for any particular length of time prior to the actual killing” 

  • Who won: Guthrie won reversed 

  • Facts: 

    • Guthrie worked at rib house as dishwasher with a few other guys  

    • Farley and some other workers were playing around with him flicking towel in his face flipped him in the nose  

    • Guthrie having a hard time others no idea he was having a hard time  

      • Had a hard time with his nose body dysmorphia  

    • Guthrie takes off gloves before stabbing Farley in the neck


4
New cards

Whats the new rule after Guthrie?

  • New rule after Guthrie: 

    • Killing done after time for prior consideration  

    • Duration not fixed  

    • As long def fully conscious of what he intended it's suf for first degree murder  


5
New cards

What does Midgett v. State elucidate?

good case to talk about the rule of lenity in relation to homicide

6
New cards

Midgett v. State (who wins, statute, facts)?

  • Who wins this case: the state  

    • They modified prev ruling to murder in 2nd degree  

    • Loses on battery "with the purpose of causing serious injury" [resulting in death] 

  • What was the statute: Ark stat ann section 41-1502 (1) (b) 

  • Mens rea: "premeditated and deliberate purpose of causing the death of another person"  

  • Facts:  

    • Father kept beating kid 

    • Beaten again on Saturday died on Wednesday  

    • Dad drank and hit him twice in stomach ache twice in neck 

    • Autopsy shows intra ab hemorrhage  

    • Rib fractures and under nourished  

  • Majority says: 

    • He intended to beat his child not kill his child  


7
New cards

Was Midgett decided on facts or law?

This was decided on the law according to what the court says not what a jury said

8
New cards

What does State v. Forest elucidate?

what does it mean to deliberate/how do we figure that out

9
New cards

State v. Forest (who wins, four possibilities, statute, phrase that pays, facts)?

  • Who won: the state (the prosecution) 

  • Four possibilities in forest 

    • First degree murder 

    • Second degree murder 

    • Vol manslaughter 

    • Not guilty  

  • What was the statute: the first degree murder statue  

  • Phrase that pays: premeditation and deliberation 

  • Facts: 

    • Ill father admitted to hospital his father's condition got worse  

    • Def left alone with father distraught, father started gurgling, pulled out a pistol and shot him 4x 

    • He says he did it; he wanted to end father's suffering  


10
New cards

Per Forest what do they use to understand wether or not he had premeditation and deliberation

  • Circumstantial evidence: 

    • No provocation 

    • Conduct and statements 

    • Threats  

    • Ill will  

    • Lethal blows after victim has been felled  

    • Done in brutal manner 


11
New cards

How could we distinguish worse murders if a premediation/deliberation formula is not used?

What MPC does is has no degrees about murder but distinguishes at sentencing