Political Parties Exam II Final Version

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/125

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

126 Terms

1
New cards

Party identification (Party ID)

A psychological attachment to a political party; forms early, is stable over time, and is the single best predictor of how someone votes.

2
New cards

5 sources of Party ID

Family, peer group, primary and secondary school, life cycle effects, generational effects.

3
New cards

Strongest source of Party ID

Family: children tend to adopt their parents' party, especially when both parents share it.

4
New cards

Life cycle effects

Party attachment strengthens with age; young people are least attached, older voters most loyal.

5
New cards

Generational effects

Major events in a cohort's formative years shape its party ID for life (e.g., Depression/New Deal generation became Democrats).

6
New cards

5 characteristics of Party ID

Psychological ties to parties; parties give policy cues; stable over time; best predictor of vote; strong ID increases political involvement.

7
New cards

Policy cues

Signals from a party that tell members what position to take, so they don't have to research every issue.

8
New cards

Why turnout matters so much to elections

Party ID is stable and members vote for their own party's candidate, so whichever side gets its people out usually wins.

9
New cards

Effect of strong Party ID

Greater political involvement: more volunteering for campaigns and higher turnout.

10
New cards

Myth of the independent voter

About 40% claim to be independent, but 15% are closet Democrats, 13% closet Republicans, and only 12% are pure independents.

11
New cards

Pure independents (12%)

Least engaged, least interested, least knowledgeable about politics, and least likely to vote.

12
New cards

Independents and age/education

Independence correlates with age and education; 58% of young people claimed independence in 1968; about 34% without a HS degree and 38% of college grads claim it.

13
New cards

The American Voter

1960 study by Angus Campbell et al. (1950s data) that divided voters into four categories: ideologues, group benefits, nature of the times, no issue content.

14
New cards

Ideologues (American Voter)

12% of voters (32% of college grads, 5% grade school or less); judge candidates on a coherent liberal-conservative framework.

15
New cards

Group benefits (American Voter)

42% of voters; 'ideology by proxy'; vote based on what helps groups they belong to (union, church, race).

16
New cards

Nature of the times (American Voter)

24% of voters; vote based on how conditions affect them personally (economy, war).

17
New cards

No issue content (American Voter)

22% of voters (10% of college grads, 26% grade school or less); unresponsive to political cues.

18
New cards

American Voter categories over time

Ideologues increased (more college education), group benefits declined, nature of the times increased, no issue content stayed the same.

19
New cards

4 factors that influence voter turnout

Excitement of the election, competitiveness of the election, stake in the system, campaign mobilization.

20
New cards

Who votes (5 traits)

The more educated, older people, public sector employees, the socially engaged, and married people.

21
New cards

Education and voting

Strongest predictor of turnout; about 75% of college graduates vote.

22
New cards

Age and voting example

Older people vote more, so Social Security is rarely up for debate while student loans are.

23
New cards

Why public sector employees vote more

They have a direct stake in who controls government (their jobs, pay, budgets).

24
New cards

Gender and turnout

Women vote at higher rates than men (since 1980), partly because more women attend college.

25
New cards

4 causes of nationalization of American politics

Mass media, government (growth of federal role), emergence of national leaders, greater focus on issues/ideology.

26
New cards

Mass media and nationalization

National radio/TV exposed people to events beyond their community, e.g., made civil rights a national issue rather than 'not in my backyard.'

27
New cards

Emergence of national leaders

National media lets politicians build national followings beyond their districts, e.g., AOC.

28
New cards

Service path (bottom up)

Republican model of strengthening the national party: aggressive fundraising, organizational improvements, better candidate recruitment, changing party image.

29
New cards

Procedural reform (top down)

Democratic model of strengthening the national party: greater transparency, more open process, more inclusive representation (rules for nominations).

30
New cards

Ray Bliss and Bill Brock

RNC chairs (1965-69, 1977-81) who built the service path: direct-mail fundraising, candidate recruitment and training.

31
New cards

National party chair

Usually chosen by the president (if the party holds the White House) or party leaders; a president-picked chair has limited independence.

32
New cards

Superdelegates

Party leaders (members of Congress, governors, state party leaders, DNC members) with automatic unpledged seats at the Democratic convention; Republicans do not use them.

33
New cards

Hunt Commission

1982 Democratic commission that created superdelegates (first used 1984) to restore party leaders' influence after the open-primary reforms.

34
New cards

4 responsibilities of state parties

Calling/organizing party conventions, drafting platforms, supervising campaign fund spending, selecting presidential electors and some national convention delegates.

35
New cards

Byrd Machine

Rural-based Democratic machine led by Harry F. Byrd Sr. that ruled Virginia from the 1930s to the 1960s.

36
New cards

What the Byrd Machine controlled

Local offices: courts, school boards, tax collection, and election boards.

37
New cards

Byrd Machine reputation

Competent management and a restricted electorate: balanced the budget ('pay as you go') while keeping people from voting (poll tax).

38
New cards

Byrd Machine turnout strategy

Did not mobilize voters broadly; turned out only its own supporters, keeping the electorate small and predictable.

39
New cards

Massive Resistance

Byrd-led Virginia opposition to school desegregation after Brown v. Board (1954), including closing schools.

40
New cards

5 causes of the Byrd Machine's demise

Baker v. Carr (1962), Voting Rights Act (1965), national Democratic Party reforms, changing electorate, conservative (Republican) alternative.

41
New cards

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Supreme Court case allowing courts to hear malapportionment claims, leading to 'one person, one vote'; ended rural overrepresentation that sustained the Byrd Machine.

42
New cards

Voting Rights Act (1965)

Federal law in which the federal government stepped in to ensure minorities could register and vote; broke the restricted electorate.

43
New cards

Conservative alternative (Virginia)

Conservatives moved to the Republican Party; Virginia was one of the first Southern states to go Republican (president from 1952; Gov. Linwood Holton 1969).

44
New cards

Urban machine

Local party in a big city that gave immigrants jobs, help and services in exchange for votes (e.g., Tammany Hall, Daley's Chicago).

45
New cards

4 causes of the decline of urban machines

Political reforms (civil service), economic changes (better jobs), federal social safety net (New Deal), decline in immigration.

46
New cards

Civil service reform and machines

Merit hiring replaced patronage, so machines could no longer hand out government jobs (Pendleton Act 1883 federally).

47
New cards

Federal safety net and machines

FDR's New Deal programs (e.g., Social Security 1935) replaced the favors machines had provided.

48
New cards

Decline in immigration and machines

Immigrants were the machine's base; restriction (Immigration Act of 1924) shrank the group needing machine help.

49
New cards

Professional activist

First allegiance is to the party; will compromise to back an electable candidate.

50
New cards

Amateur activist

Issue-oriented purist; support depends on the candidate's agenda and is withdrawn if the party ignores their issues.

51
New cards

Who becomes a party activist

People from political families, the better educated and wealthier, those with a policy agenda, and the ideologically driven.

52
New cards

4 incentives for activism

Material benefits (jobs), social incentives (shared values/company), issue-based incentives, mixed incentives.

53
New cards

3 ways parties use issues

Mobilize and motivate supporters, expand their base, project a desired image.

54
New cards

Democratic coalition

Northeast and West Coast, urban voters, African Americans, Hispanics, LGBTQ, feminists, union members, the poor, liberals, college-educated, single people, immigrants.

55
New cards

Republican coalition

South and Mountain West, Southern whites, rural voters, white evangelicals, mainline Protestants, business, the wealthy, conservatives, married and older voters.

56
New cards

Democratic issues

Expanded healthcare, LGBT issues, environment, raise taxes, poverty programs, gun control, pro-choice, civil rights.

57
New cards

Republican issues

Second Amendment, pro-life, cut taxes, reduce regulation, free trade, strong defense, traditional values, religious liberty.

58
New cards

Gender gap

Women vote more Democratic than men (clear since 1980); men more conservative on welfare and environment.

59
New cards

New Deal coalition

1932 Democratic coalition of the white South, urban workers, unions, Catholics, Jews and Black voters.

60
New cards

Faction

A party within a party: an organized group inside a party pushing its own agenda.

61
New cards

4 things factions organize around

An individual, a region, a common policy agenda, a desire for patronage.

62
New cards

GOP factions

Moderates, establishment/business, social conservatives.

63
New cards

Democratic factions

Progressives, New Democrats, centrists/Blue Dogs.

64
New cards

What factions influence

Party leadership fights, bills debated or modified, appointments, party platforms, elections.

65
New cards

Voice (factions)

Expressing disapproval by staying in the party and fighting from inside (primaries, platform fights).

66
New cards

Exit (factions)

Leaving the party; usually costly to reelection (e.g., Arlen Specter switched parties in 2009 and lost the 2010 primary).

67
New cards

Realigning (critical) election

An election that durably reshuffles party coalitions and the balance of power; theory from V.O. Key (1955).

68
New cards

6 characteristics of realigning elections

High voter interest, sharp party differences on key issues, changed voting patterns/coalitions, long unified party control, change in balance of power, regularity (every 30-36 years).

69
New cards

Six party eras

1800-1828, 1828-1860, 1860-1896, 1896-1932, 1932-1968, 1968-present.

70
New cards

1800-1828 era

Democratic-Republican dominance after Jefferson's 1800 win; Federalists collapse.

71
New cards

1828-1860 era

Democratic dominance after Jackson's 1828 win; exceptions were Whig war heroes (Harrison 1840, Taylor 1848).

72
New cards

1860-1896 era

Republican dominance after Lincoln's 1860 win (slavery, Civil War).

73
New cards

1896-1932 era

Republican dominance after McKinley beat Bryan in 1896 (industry vs. agrarian populism).

74
New cards

1932-1968 era

Democratic dominance under FDR's New Deal coalition.

75
New cards

1968-present era

Contested: Republicans won 5 of 6 presidential elections 1968-88 while Democrats controlled Congress; divided government suggests dealignment.

76
New cards

Maintaining election

Majority party wins and the existing alignment holds (e.g., 1936, 1964).

77
New cards

Deviating election

Minority party wins due to short-term factors without changing the alignment (e.g., Eisenhower 1952, 1956).

78
New cards

Secular realignment

Gradual change in voting behavior over many elections as groups and issues shift parties (e.g., white South moving to GOP, 1960s-1994).

79
New cards

Dealignment

Decline in party loyalties so no clean realignment occurs; divided government becomes the norm.

80
New cards

Counterargument to dealignment

Party ID still predicts voting well; most self-described independents are actually partisans.

81
New cards

Origin of primaries

Progressive Era reform in the early 20th century (Wisconsin first statewide, 1903); before that party leaders chose nominees.

82
New cards

Closed primary

Only registered party members vote. Pro: party picks its own candidates, gets list of supporters. Con: more ideological nominees, loses chance to attract new voters.

83
New cards

Open primary

Any voter can choose a party's ballot. Pro: broader-appeal candidate, attracts non-traditional voters. Con: may not reflect party base; crossover voters can influence outcome.

84
New cards

Blanket primary

All candidates on one ballot; vote for anyone per office. Pro: no intermediary, can elect in one election. Con: no clear party choice; two same-party candidates may reach runoff.

85
New cards

California Democratic Party v. Jones (2000)

Supreme Court struck down California's partisan blanket primary as violating parties' freedom of association.

86
New cards

6 reasons parties dislike primaries

Divisive; charges reused in general election; costly; hurt party's image; produce ideological nominees; limit party influence.

87
New cards

Willie Horton (1988)

George H.W. Bush's attacks on Dukakis over a Massachusetts furlough program, first raised by Al Gore in the Democratic primary: primary charges reused in the general.

88
New cards

1968 Democratic nomination

LBJ withdrew over Vietnam; RFK was assassinated; VP Hubert Humphrey was nominated without entering any primaries, prompting reform.

89
New cards

McGovern-Fraser Commission

Post-1968 Democratic commission that rewrote nomination rules for 1972, shifting power to primary voters and the national party.

90
New cards

5 rules of the 1968 commission

Delegates chosen by PR; affirmative action clauses; delegates chosen in the convention's calendar year; selection procedures defined and open; delegates free to vote as they want (no unit rule).

91
New cards

Unit rule

Old rule requiring a state's whole delegation to vote as a bloc; eliminated by the 1968 commission.

92
New cards

5 requirements of delegate selection (for candidates)

Start early, be seen as legitimate, win or do well early, sustain efforts, recognize the party has different interests.

93
New cards

Gary Hart 1984

Did well early (upset Mondale in New Hampshire) but the party establishment backed the tested Mondale; shows party prefers low-risk nominees.

94
New cards

6 criticisms of the nomination process

Too much weight on early caucuses/primaries; officeholders can't take time off; too much money; low, unrepresentative participation; exaggerates regional factors; too much media power.

95
New cards

What conventions do

Approve the platform, formalize the presidential nomination, approve the VP nominee, showcase issues and new politicians, launch the campaign.

96
New cards

McGovern / Eagleton 1972

VP pick Thomas Eagleton had received electroshock therapy; dropped after 18 days; showed poor judgment and vetting.

97
New cards

McCain / Palin 2008

Surprise VP pick of Sarah Palin energized the base but raised readiness questions, hurting McCain's judgment argument.

98
New cards

Why the VP pick matters

It is the nominee's first major decision and shows voters how they make decisions.

99
New cards

1960 Democratic nomination process

About 16 primaries, favorite sons, winner-take-all, no spending limits, state party leaders key, limited media, few women/minorities, unknowns had little chance; party elders chose JFK.

100
New cards

Favorite son

A state's own politician who runs only to control its delegates and bargain at the convention.