Topic 12: Judgement and Reasoning

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

Attribute substitution

Relying on easily assessable info as a proxy for the info actually need.

(Eg, the info that u need to make a logical decision is the frequency of winning a lottery ticket, but the info you used if the recent lucky experiences which is the readily available info)

2
New cards

frequency estimate

an assessment of how often various events occurred in the past

(eg, you get all green lights and test pushed back so you think if you get a lottery ticket you'll win)

3
New cards

Heuristics

Cognitive shortcuts used to reason and make decisions efficiently.

4
New cards

Availability heuristic

Using readily available info to answer questions or make decisions quickly.

5
New cards

Representativeness heuristic

Judging likelihood by comparing an event, person, or object to an existing schema.

6
New cards

Affect heuristic

Judging risks and potential benefits based on how thinking about the outcome feels.

7
New cards

Effort heuristic

Judging value estimates based on how much effort was spent to gain the outcome.

8
New cards

Gambler's fallacy

Reasoning that random outcomes can be affected by previous outcomes or are self-correcting.

(eg, flipping a coin and it lands of head 6 times, you think it must be tails next since its 'overdue')

9
New cards

The 'man who' argument

Trying to refute a statistical trend by citing a single, isolated personal anecdote.

10
New cards

Covariation

Statistical term where 2 or more things change or happen together in a related way.

(eg, everyone is late because of an accident (blame the situation) one person is late and always is (blame the person)

11
New cards

Base rate

rate of occurrence for an event over4 a long period of time

12
New cards

Base-rate neglect

Failing to adequately consider the general prevalence of an event when evaluating probability of specific outcomes, and focus on specific details about a single case.

(Eg, told that "Alex is shy, loves to read poetry, and likes working alone." Asked if he is a librarian or teacher. Think librarian since he fits the stereotype despite there being vastly more teachers and more likely to be one.

13
New cards

Confirmation bias

Tendency to favor info aligning with pre-existing beliefs while ignoring contradicting evidence.

14
New cards

Dual Processing Model

Suggests there are two types of thinking

15
New cards

Type 1 thinking

Fast, automatic processing impacted by heuristics and emotions.

(For most decisions to be fast and efficient)

16
New cards

Type 2 thinking

Controlled, deliberate, analytical, and logical processing.

(resort to for more important decisions)

17
New cards

Deduction

process where we use top-down processing to draw conclusions about events, experiences, objects, etc…

18
New cards

Wason four-card task

Deductive reasoning test.

(Presented with four cards, and a rule about the cards. They then have to indicate the minimum number of cards that need to be Investigated to assess if the rules are being followed and which cards need to be)

19
New cards

Belief perseverance

Clinging to beliefs even when disconfirming evidence is undeniable.

20
New cards

Utility maximizing

Making decisions that bring as much value as possible.

21
New cards

Framing of outcomes

How the wording of a choice's results impacts the decision made.

22
New cards

Affective forecasting

Predicting future emotions, often overestimating their intensity and duration.

23
New cards

Somatic markers

Bodily responses elicited by memories that help evaluate decision options.

24
New cards

Risk seeking

tends to happen if the framing of a decision casts a choice in terms of losses, bc we are attracted to the idea that maybe we can avoid a loss

25
New cards

Risk aversion

tends to happen if a decision is framed in terms of gaining, we refuse to gamble the loss of what we already have.