1/112
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
social inequality
refers to statuses and roles with structured differences in access to resources and opportunities ex: social class
emotional inequality
persistent difference in the population in the experience of both negative and positive affect ex: depression
the stress process
a general framework for the entire area, linking sources of inequality to both differential exposure to stress over time and uneven distribution of coping resources as a process explaining differences in mental health outcomes
types of stressors: life event, chronic stress, traumaas
coping resources
medical model
an illness model
assumption that mental disorder is a disease or a disease like condition
explained by genetic defeats, biochemical imbalances etc
treatment: medical interventions
issues with the medical model
often no clearly demonstrated biological causation
no clear reason for chosen thresholds
social causation
differences in social environments are a root cause of differences in mental health. The argument for social causation: differences in cumulative stress exposure through lids due to social disadvantage, coupled with fewer resources to cope with that stress
social causation vs social selection
social selection
mental illness occurs due to biological or genetic factors, but when it occurs it has social consequences.
social causation vs social selection
distress
A central marker of mental health differences in the population:
A collection of symptoms of depression and anxiety, the most prevalent marker of differences in mental health of the population
The subtlety of asking about components rather than the whole
stress theory
Mainly refers to the Stress Process Model
Sources of social inequality i.e., social status wrestling in differential exposure to stress over time
Differential access to resources to cope with stress
The dual nature of the consequences of social inequalities is key
origins of stress theory
Selye 1956: the stress of life, the biological stress model
Stages of general adaptation syndrome
Stressors (sudden acute or chronic) → alarm response → resistance → exhaustion
Stressors defined
Threats: require a response
Demands: overload, burden, a feeling of being pushed
Constraints: severe and persistent restriction of choice, opportunities, or under-reward or discrimination
differential exposure hypothesis
literally used in thousands of studies, almost always predictive of risk for mental health and health problems
BUT the correlation was often small relative to what was expected
Average correlation was around 0.30
trait hypothesis
peoples reactions to stress depend on their personal characteristic or traits
differential vulnerability hypothesis
people respond differently to stress because they have different coping resources
the context hypothesis
the effect of stress depend on the broader social context in which it occurs
the stress domain hypothesis
peoples responses to stress may differ depending on the type or domain of stress they experience
Beach and Amir
somatic symptoms: Physical symptoms of distress (like headaches or fatigue) may reflect disruptions in several of the body’s systems working together to stay balanced.
Distress is dimensional: Distress exists on a spectrum, from mild to severe. It is a normal response to extreme stress, rather than automatically meaning someone has a mental disorder.
Signs of disability signal defeat: When someone visibly shows distress or inability to cope, others may see them as less of a threat or competitor. This can reduce hostility and competition toward them, potentially preventing their situation from getting worse
medicalization of deviance
original sociological alternative to the medical model (60s/70s) is the anti-psychiatry critique
illness is a socially unacceptable behavior that successfully labeled by others as being deviant
mental disorders are myths
socially devalued people
interpretative viewpoint
focuses on how individuals make sense of their experience of what is known as mental illness, and how these understandings shape their sense of self
explanatory/etiological approach
these states can meaningfully be understood as mental illness and sets as its prime task the identification of the social factors that are likely to cause these states
social constructionist approach
takes as problematic the translation of aberrant states into illnesses
concepts vs measures
concepts are defined theoretically
measures are operational expressions of concepts
Disorder
refers to two categories: ill and not ill
criteria to decide which based on DSM
Distress
gradient of symptoms
score from 9 to the maximum of the numbers of symptoms asked
can be a number of symptoms or a total score, based on frequency of each symptoms
Wakefield
A psychological or behavioral syndrome that exists in the individual
The condition is a sign of dysfunction in some respect – a cognitive, motivational, behavioral, emotional, or other psychological mechanism that does not function properly.
There is evidence of real harm to self or others – forms of distress and disability (impairment of functioning).
Not due to social disapproval.
Cannot be due to an expectable and culturally sanctioned response to a particular event
A serious non self-limiting condition
Disorder vs Distress (Horwitz)
disorder:
Refers to an internal dysfunction - non-normal responses to environmental inputs
Such as: response to external stressors must be disproportionate
distress:
Refers only to normal, expectable responses to environmental challenges and threats
Sociological studies usually deal with exactly the kinds of expectable and culturally sanctioned responses that the DSM excludes from its definition of mental disorder because they arise in response to social stressors and only persist as long as these stressful social conditions endure
categorical vs continuous
Wheaton on distress
distress refers to the level of anxiety and depression symptomatology indicating an affectively based impairment in social functioning capacities
what were the main controversies surrounding the ECA and NCS studies
The studies found unexpectedly high rates of mental disorders in the general population, and prevalence rates differed across studies, raising concerns about the reliability and accuracy of diagnostic measurement.
the study of prevalence
percent of the population with a given disorder in a given time period
the notion requires a threshold and thus a categorical approach
requires a defined time period
effect of structure and order
DIS - screening questions at the beginning of each section
CIDI - Kessler put all of the screening questions at the front which increase the rate because denials less likely at the beginning of the interview
The structure and order of screening questions can significantly impact the reported prevalence of mental disorders, as earlier questions may prime respondents to acknowledge symptoms, leading to higher rates of indication.
validity of measure
gold standard: perfectly valid
two main criteria
sensitivity: ability to detect true cases
specificity: ability to exclude true non cases
distress scales: importance
Distress scales are instruments used to measure the level of psychological distress experienced by individuals. They help in identifying the severity of symptoms and the need for further psychological assessment or intervention.
defining normal
the problem with defining an expectable or normal response to stress
cannot be due to an expectable and culturally sanctioned response to a particular event suggests the same problem. What is an expectable, i.e., normal response?
Cannot define or measure something by referencing its causes! (Very important) have to measure defining signs and symptoms
Cannot define or measure something by referencing its causes! (Very important) have to measure defining signs and symptoms
clinical bias
Bias in selection of who gets treated
Barriers to treatment
Availability of services
Friends of psychotherapy
The Clinicians Illusion - may overestimate how common mental disorders are and misunderstand how they occur in general population
Andrews and Slade
distress measures moderate and transient problems that do not reflect serious impairment in functioning
this is wrong: distress is stable consequential and maps to measures of disorder
proximity of common unhappiness and misery
assessed the unique role of social factors at extreme vs more moderate levels of distress measures
if effects do not change then the role of social determinants cannot be assumed to be limited to mild to moderate health problems
serious health problems left to biological or genetic causation
forms of regression coefficient
The direction of the relationship between each variable and higher scores on distress
The significance of the relationship
The coefficient interpreted: each unit increase in that variable results in a shift of that many units measuring the level of distress
mental health as a single continuum: caspi and moffitt
a single dimension is able to measure and maybe even explain a person’s liability to mental disorder, comorbidity among disorders, persistence of disorders over time and severity of symptoms
p: psychopathology g:cognitive ability
p = neuroticism or negative emotions
regression coefficients
Defined as the number of units of change in a dependent variable (Y) resulting from a one unit increase in an independent variable (X)
Have to pay attention on how things are measured
Variables with fewer units have apparently larger effects, because a 1 unit difference is a larger proportion of the total range of differences
dummy variables
1/0 variables denoting membership in a group
The b for these variables is the mean difference on the dependent variable between the group defined by the dummy variable and the reference group
relative risk
the percent in one group who have a disorder compared to the percent in another group who have a disorder
If 20% of women are depressed and 10% of men are then the relative risk is 20/10 = 2 (twice as likely)
odds ratio
the odds of one group having a disorder compared to another group where
Odds are the probability of having a disorder relative to the probability of not having a disorder
Odds for women vs men above are 0.2/0.8 / 0.1/0.9 = 2.25
NCS-R and prevalence
Rates of most disorders higher than expected
Anxiety disorders slightly more prevalent than 1994- more measured
Mood disorders similar - almost exactly the same
New category of disruptive behavior / impulse control disorders: 1 in 4 lifetime
Substance use - noticeably less prevalent
consistency of gender difference
higher the equality the higher the gender gap
higher level of distress among girls compared to boys
gender differences are due to actual differences in life experiences, social status, and cumulative exposure to stress and demands in social roles
why is the higher the equality the higher the gender gap?
men actually benefit more from more gender-equal policies (cumulative advantage)
expectations due to improvements in equality rise faster than actual levels of equality
change in reference groups for women over time to comparable males not other females
lack of institutional support infrastructure
double burden in women’s lives
Simon: differential exposure
women are more exposed to role related stresses
consistent with the idea that paid employment would help but how much depends on how much is shared at home
focused on the invisible, isolated and devalued role of homemaker among most women in the middle 20th century
differential meaning of work relative to domestic identity for women vs men
Simon: Differential Vulnerability
women are more susceptible to the effects of stressors whether they have more stress or not
fewer personal resources to deal with stress
women use emotion-focused coping more than men
overall differential vulnerability not demonstrated
women have more social support
gendered response hypothesis
men and women respond to stress with different types of mental health problems but do not differ in overall reactivity
effects of stress can occur across a number of mental health outcomes
have to measure multiple outcomes
women’s response to stress is internalized and mens is externalized
Aneshensel on gender
can’t infer overall differences from research focusing on depression or anxiety only
need to study multiple outcomes to detect whether responses to stress are gendered - flow through gendered ways of responding
Campbell: does the country context matter (gender)
yes
overall GDP (economic development) related to higher gender gaps
all measures of gender equality were related to larger not smaller gaps
Men vs women: self schema (Rosenfeld)
women emphasize the salience of others in their identity more than men, thus depending on others evaluations more
creates a greater risk for depression and anxiety
men emphasize self-salience, which increases the risk of externalizing problems when goals are frustrated
the feeling rules of gender
Ross and Mirowsky: Traditional
wife unemployed
does not prefer wife’s employment
husband does not share housework
Women more depressed
Ross and Mirowsky: Traditional with market demands
wife employed
does not prefer wife’s employment
husband does not share housework
husband more depressed
Ross and Mirowsky: Transitional
wife employed
prefers wife’s employment
husband does not share housework
women much more depressed - men much less depressed
Ross and Mirowsky: Modern
wife is employed
prefers wife’s employment
husband shares housework
least depressing for both genders
smallest gap
still a small gap due to child arrangements affecting women more and remaining imbalance in the distribution of household labor
Work-family conflict (Ross and Mirowsky)
many wives are employed yet are solely or largely responsible for child care
produces role strain: overload from the sheer amount of effort it takes to perform in both arenas and conflict from meeting the expectations of people who do not take each other into account
women who have husbands who help with child care and have easy access to child care in general have distress as low as their husbands
Minority stress perspective (Meyer)
increased exposure to repeated and prevalent stressful events involving discrimination, hate, or threat
the need for vigilance (chronic stress)
concealment of sexual identity
internalized homophobia
stressors from distal to proximal
discrimination, violence, interpersonal rejection and hate —>
fear of rejection, internalized homophobia, withdrawal, separation from others
moderators
resources that intervenes to reduce the consequences of exposures to minority stressors
parental support
self-acceptance
married/partner
older age
network support
Impact of marriage (Simon)
marriage is consistent with:
lower levels of distress and depression
lower risk of many disorders
fewer substance problems
less anger
higher levels of happiness
Marriage: Social selection theory
mentally healthy more likely to marry and stay married
factors associated with the choice to marry also related to mental health in the long run
prior mental health —> selection into marriage —> later mental health
the gain loss controversy
whether gains and losses are matched
in marriage they are - contradicts the marital crisis model saying that only loss counts
Benefits of marriage
institutionalized and available confidant/social support
interpreted as an indicator of social competence
pooling of economic resources
social integration/social capital/networks
relationship quality
Bernard - Two marriages
Hers one of service, his one of acheiveme t
intersection of gender and marriage - sex-role theory
Simon - Sex role theory
a theory focused on restricted access to public roles plus assignment to lower status private roles
high demands in roles that are under-rewarded
Simon - Feminist theory
focused more on the resulting opposite problem: too much to do and too little reward or support
structural subordination is systemic across roles
high demands in roles that are under-rewarded
Amato: marriage benefits mental health
selection: fixed effects results already shown
cohabitation: has the same effect as marriage
gender equal effects: additional evidence of equal effects in recent studies
Same sex marriage
no effect of registered domestic partnerships
marriage laws may help protect LGBTQ from higher risk of mental health problems
in states where same sex marriage is banned LGBTQ stress is higher
Relationship affects on depression
men and women benefit from marriage equally
men benefit much more from cohabitation
women suffer more from divorce than men
divorced men with relationships no different than married
never married relationships no better than no relationship
Tony Brown - Race
socially constructed status based on observed phenotypic differences that manifest largely irrelevant underlying differences in genotype
suggests race is assumed to be viable mainly because there are ascriptive markers that have social meaning and social consequence
Black-white paradox
Oppressed people should have higher rates of mental issues but they don’t
paradox inside a paradox: Black people have higher rates of physical illness and disability but also have lower rates of mental disorder - black people sometimes report higher levels of distress than whites but lower rates of disorder
Williams: consequences of discrimination
diffusion of threat:
police killings of unarmed Black men affects the mental health of all Black people in the population
acceptance of terms:
called internalized racism - lower self-esteem, more isolation, lower levels of sense of control over their lives
political polarization resulting indirectly from Black people achieving higher and more influential position:
activates existing discrimination
those in power set the tone and the normative limits
Williams: inter-generational effects
mothers who report discrimination directly impact their children’s emotional functioning six years later
have poorer mental health themselves, spillover
use harsher parents practices as a result
stress proliferation
the process of stressors leading to other stressors
discrimination as a start point for other stressors:
unemployment
food insecurity
financial hardship etc
Irony of mobility among black people (Wheaton et Williams)
upward mobility leads to more contact with whites, thus greater probability of direct exposure to discrimination
Williams: Mental health paradox
african americans have worse health than whites on virtually every indicator of physical health but have lower rates of stress related mental health outcomes, such as major depression
Louie and Wheaton: black-white pardox explanation
coping
developed regimens due to higher stress histories
culture
religion, family, collectivist ideologies
stress histories
the ceiling effect of past stress leads to lower current threat
Louie and Wheaton: Coping explanation
counterbalancing influence on the effect of stress
personal coping resources studied in the stress process include: sense of control, trust, flexibility, and self esteem
Louie and Wheaton: self esteem
is formed in more proximate and primary social environments
provides protective value through the parental socialization of the value of black identity, emphasizing the value, strength, and resilience of black culture
Louie and Wheaton: Counterbalancing effects model
self esteem is higher in black adolescence
suggesting a counterbalancing element in the process that connects race to mental health
stress increases the black-white relative risk but mental health problems but enhanced self-esteem decreases the black-white relative risk for mental health problems
the two may counteract each other resulting in either no difference or even lower rates when comparing black people to white in the US
Distress and Disorder comparison (Black-white)
lower distress: mainly explained by self esteem and family support
lower disorder: self esteem and divine intervention
the healthy immigrant
the fact that new immigrants measure better on mental health than the native born
Joly and Wheaton Mental Health after Migration from Human Rights Abuse
conditions in countries of origin have a long term effect on mental health
these are long term effects
cumulative stress starting in the country of origin and continuing after migration
consistent with the issue of stress proliferation over lives
average effects of period
increasing over time
average effects of aging
decreasing with age
average effects of cohort
increase with cohort
the life course perspective
the life course is the study of both unique and structured pathways through life from birth to death
the long view of lives
small events, at the right time multiply
interplay of life trajectories and turning points
emphasis on timing, duration, and sequence
an alternative model to the developmental approach in psychology and psychodynamic approach in psychiatry
Views of Age: Maturity
better mental heath with age
effects of experience, personal growth, practice, learning, acceptance
Views of Age: Decline
worse mental health with age
increasing frailty of health, functional impairments, loss of resources (sense of control, support)
Views of Age: life stage
better mental health in mid life
the developmental period of adulthood- acquisition of roles and statuses
employment and marital status, job achievement, parenting, income
Views of Age: Generation (cohort)
mixed
cohort changes alter exposures in younger cohorts- increases in education, life expectancy, but also divorce rates
Views of Age: Survival
better mental health with age
age stands for survival traits - anything that predicts lower risk of death through life, including depression
What explains the age pattern in depression
(in order of importance)
life stage: economic prosperity, employment, marriage
cohort: lower education among the old, increased single parent and divorced parent background among the young
decline: illness, impairments, loss sense of control
The long view of lives
the importance of remove causation in lives
re-activation throughout life in basic issues (self is constant)
selection processes of the person into similar environments
stability of social conditions of one’s life: SES
choice is consistent
stress proliferation
Elder and Liker: Hard Times in Women’s Lives
study of women over 40 years, from the Depression to 1969
the long-term effect of social class resources in conjunction with economic deprivation in the Depression
economic loss was not concentrated in one group but random
middle class women: positive effect of economic deprivation over 40 years
working class women: negative effect of economic deprivation over 40 years
Wheaton: the changing role of childhood stress over lives
childhood stress multiplies the consequences of current chronic stress
middle levels of childhood stress optimal for immunity for later stress
Life Course: Cumulative advantage and disadvantage
how the current state of resources can either reduce or multiply the consequences of current problems and create greater inequality in functioning over time
long term effects of childhood poverty, neighborhood disadvantage
small events, small differences, can turn into major differences in the long-run
differences due to choice of school (quasi experiment in Britain)
Miech and Shanahan Social Class
Those who have had more years of education have lower rates of depression (dropping the lowest around 55)
Life Course: Duration
the length of time in a given state or condition without change, or the total time in a given state over the life course
longest contiguous time of exposure
proportion of total time exposed
total time of exposure with interruptions
ex: losses in long term occupational achievement among women (time out of the labor force)