1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Materialistic: cause of chnage
Usually means economic factors
natural resources (land, animals)
Wealth distribution or concentration
Technologies of economic production (factories, tools, labor unions, laws regarding work or property rights)
How does technology cause change?
increases alternatives available in a society
Alters interaction patterns among people
Creates new”problems” to be dealt with
Involves skills, routines, methods, and knowledge
Scientific method
Written communication
Computer/social media literacy
Housing loans and mortgages & credit organizations and tools
Technology is a system
cultural lag
speed gap between material changes and non material (cultural) changes
limitations to the materialist perspective
significant social change can occur without technical change
When technical change occurs in some contexts, it might not produce much change in others
Resistance to materialist social change: the “conversation peasant”
conservative peasant hypothesis
peasants in poor countries are reisstant to technological change because they are engaged in an economy that has to do with family obligations, fairness, and community well being
Many able to maintain rough but sustainable life
In moral economy, ‘technological development” means uncertainty and risk when there is already a model that works
Outside perspectives may see that conservative peasants as irrational, but for the conservative peasant, change is irrational
Idealist perspective
knowledge
Beliefs
Values (assumptions about what is desirable and undesirable)
Ideology: “more or less organized combination of beliefs and values that serves to justify or legitimize forms of human action”
The American dream
3 main ways ideas cause change
Legitimizing a desired direction of change
Providing the basis for the social solidarity necessary to promote change
Highlighting contradictions and problems
providing the necessary social solidarity
ideology can be a powerful mobilizing force in times if war; for instance, justifying and promoting the war as a “holy crusade”, a “defense of democracy”
No just political sloganeering, each set goals and agendas for change and helped to mobilize popular support fair those goals
idea systems as powerful drivers of social change
Nationalism, ideology of particular identity and community of a people based on shared history, culture, and language, has been & remains, a potent force for conflict and change
impossible to understand the changing relationships between these groups and their states fully in terms of material and economic factors alone without considering the powerful role of nationalist ideas, cultures, and myths