1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Social Construction
def: an issue that is constructed into a social problem socially by people defining conditions as undesirable.
Focuses on/ investigates types of claims and counter claims, how claims makers organize, and how particular claims gain authority
Assumptions: No universal condition is inherently bad, but it is labeled as such by people in a given society
Claims: about the social problems, assertion about positive and negative aspects
Claims makers: those who seek to impose a particular definition of reality
Questions: causes, effects, characteristics
Structural Functionalism
Thinking of society as a car (the components are the different social systems) and how the parts do or don’t maintain order
Assumption: parts are interrelated and exert pressure to the system
Key terms: Norms, values, roles, institutions
Modes of inquiry: How might a problem contribute to society, How might a problem be sustained by structures, and how do societies develop and evolve
Critiques: assumes consensus, ignores that some groups have their own needs, ignores conflict between groups, ignores the roles of power, and who has it
Manifest Function
intended purpose of social change
Latent function
unexpected consequences of social change
Herbert Spence
Structural Functionalist theorist
Thought of society as integrated systems (human body)
Competition leads to slow evolutionary improvement
Social order is a product of human rationality
Emile Durkheim
Structural Functionalist theorist
believed we have to have a shared morality to move forward
Solidarity: common sentiment (pre-contract is needed to build trust)
Collective consciousness: beliefs and feelings held in common
Robert Merton
Sub-theory under Structural Functionalism
Strain theory: theory of differential access
“approved route”
what if there is no access? people will turn to illegitamite means which turns into crime
Conflict Theory
Believes that society doesn’t work for everyone, there are contradictory interests and inequalities between social groups which creates conflict and change
Something becomes a social problem when one group feels its values or expectations are being violated, which leads to false values and alienation
Those in power maintain control through institutions, economy, access to resources, media, etc.
Assumes that: humans are rational acting to max self-interest and resources are limited
Due to the social stratification system (heirarchical, superimposed classes, unequal distributions)
Ways to analyze society through theory: Who is suffering from the problem (characteristics of group and why it continues)? Could some group be profiting? If the social problem is addressed, does one group get more (in theory and practice)?
Other theorists: Ida B. Wells, W.E.B Dubois
Critiques: consensus theory believes that people are just and will distribute resources, ignores how some social institutions may be benefitting society, doesn’t give people agency
Karl Marx
Conflict Theorist (sub-theory on capitalism)
He believed everything came down to a struggle of classes and that until unequal structures change, social problems can’t be erradicated
Sociological Imagination
Idea came from conflict theorist C. Wright Mills
It describes the kind of insight given through sociology and the awareness and connection between individual experience and broader society. History is important to this and we should use it to fight social injustice.
Symbolic Interactionist theory
Views society as the product of individuals interacting. Focuses on how people percieve and define events that influence their life. Society isn’t an overarching structure but the combination of millions separate interpretations.
Assumptions: humans are symbol manipulating, there are underlying forms or patterns of social life, the social world is interactive
research questions: how do people become involved in problematic behavior? How to people come to define issues as social problems?
Attitudes + Ideologies = behavior
Critiques: ignores social structures, ignores power, ignores history
Herbert Mead
Symbolic Interactionist theorist
Believes and assumes that meaning emerges through interactions, human beings are distinctly symbol-manipulating, the social world is interactive, and there are underlying patterns or forms of social life
Intersectionality
Every person has many identities that are in different levels of power
Extreme, Relative, and Human poverty
Extreme: lack of income necessary to satisfy basic food needs
Relative: lack of income necessary to satisfy basic non-food needs
Human: lack of basic human ability (malnutrition, illiteracy, etc.)
Social Mobility
movement of individuals, families within or between layers of social stratification
(less SM= more inequality)
Wealth Inequality
Unequal distribution of income and wealth
Social Problem: houselessness (from the 4 perspectives)
Social Constructionalism perspective: looks at the different ways poverty is talked about and advocated for changes responses, and environmental and governmental factors change what actually gains traction
Structural perspective: Decline in low cost housing, increase in poverty, deindustrilization, and deinstitutionalization
Symbolic perspective: these explanations are often used to understand differences between racial and ethnic group success rates. This view ignores everything else
Conflict theory perspective: poverty is not natural and is caused by flaws in society (mainly racism)
Cynthia Bogard
Social Constructionalist who looked at the different views of the impoverished in D.C. vs. New York.
People in D.C. advocated more for people in poverty, and believed that their circumstances were due to unfair systems. Didn’t look down on the impoverished as much as in New York, where they were believed to be lazy.
William Julius Wilson
Structural perspectivist who looked at deindustrilization as the cause of poverty.
Explains the shift from manufacturing jobs to lower-paying service based jobs and the difference between that and the technological business
Skills mismatch leads to social isolation
Oscar Lewis
Spiritual perspective
“culture of poverty”, on notion that the stratification is based on ability and their cultrue
failure of people
Ivan Light
Spiritual perspective
Compared asian american businesses and african american businesses (trust and rotating credit association vs. competition)
Doug Massey and Nancy Denton
Conflict theorists
Argue with Wilson, and claim that poverty is all due to race and racism
Melvin Oliver and Thomas Shapiro
Conflict perspectives
Its a combination of factors and the credit factors (think about wealth and income)
What makes a social problem?
Contradicts some other condition and is defined as incompatible with the desired quality of life
Is caused, facilitated, or prolonged by factors at multiple levels of social life
Involves inter-group conflict
requires social action to be resolved
MPI
Multidimensional Poverty Index
International measure of acute multidimensional poverty
Dimensions: Health, Education, Standard of Living
Range is from 0-1 (lower you are the better you perform on the index)
How is poverty measured in the US?
poverty threshold/ status
determines poverty based on pretax income data with a poverty threshold
Through this, they determine who gets benefits off of this
SPM
Supplemental Poverty measure
A different and more 21st century oriented way of looking at poverty
takes more into account peoples resources, locations, and other expenses
does not replace the official poverty index
Challenges to reporting poverty and gathering data
Different timelines of poverty: continual vs episodic
Self reports of income, and not taking everything into account (other expenses)
Allard and the access to opportunities
geography determines what kind of opportunities people have access to (proximity to jobs, school, and services)
can be caused by racial segregation
can lead to increased exposure to stress, violence, etc.
less mobility and accessibility especially in suburban areas
Gans and the function of poverty
Low wages and decreased unions make affluent lives easier.
Some groups benefit while others pay significant costs
determining causation does not justify the inequality