1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Rolling Thunder
After the Tonkin Gulf Resolution + VC attacks on the South → Johnson orders for Rolling Thunder
3 years of bombing the North and some areas of the South
Stop VC from infiltrating South (failed)
Help morale and give Saigon a break
Marines sent to protect air bases = increase in troops
Domino Theory
Dien Bien Phu Loss → Eisenhower believed that if Vietnam fell to communism, others would too
Made US leaders fear a spread, meaning continued US involvement
Geneva Accords
After France lost at Dien Bien Phu
Agreements ending the First Indochina War between France and the Viet Minh.
Vietnam divided at the 17th parallel → nationwide reunification elections soon
Stopped France from regaining control
US + SV did not sign = claim they were not bound by its decisions
Set the stage for a larger US and SV involvement
Passage to Freedom
After Geneva Accords, millions of Catholic Vietnamese moved from North to South due to US propaganda:
“Christ has gone South” to Diem
Claim Viet Minh committed atrocities against Catholics
Religious bias shaped U.S. support for Diem/Catholics and discriminated over Buddhists
Tonkin Gulf Controversey
During Johnsons presidency
USS Maddox attacked
2nd attack reported (probably didn’t happen)
U.S. patrols were supporting SV raids
Johnson administration misrepresented the relationship between these operations and the attacks to Congress.
Tonkin Gulf Resolution: Increase military engagement
Deception: They had approved large military authority on a misleading account, which escalated the war
Massive Retaliation vs Flexible Response
Massive retaliation: Eisenhower and Dulles used nuclear threat to deter comm
Flexible response: Kennedy used range of military options, including conventional forces and counterinsurgency
Easier to intervene in a limited, unconventional war
Increased US commitment of troops and spending
Flexible response gave presidents more ways to intervene in Vietnam, but it also facilitated growing American commitments without guaranteeing military or political success.
Intro
Geneva conference was best time to exit becuase it provided an opportunity before:
Commiting more resources
Continuing to back an unstable government
Body 1: French-Viet Minh War
France no longer had control
GA split Vietnam + reunification election
US could have used this as an opportunity to sign, withdraw, and put effort into turning election towards SV leaders
Instead, they refused, drawing the US into a larger conflict against North Vietnam, china, and the USSR
Body 2: Herring - US Contribution to SV Army
US took responsability for defending SV
Herring mentions that US provided assistance, training, and development for the SV army
US role was expnading beyond financial support
Could have backed out before committing, troops, money, resources and taking too much responability
Body 3: Diem’s Government
By defending South, US was also sticking up for Diem’s regime
Diem’s regime became weakend by incidents such as disrupting a peacful buddhist protest
Created opposition within the South
Outrage among US citizens