motor control unit 2

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/105

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:16 AM on 10/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

106 Terms

1
New cards

Performance Outcome Measures

Measures the result or outcome of a motor skill, such as distance thrown, speed, or reaction time.

2
New cards

Performance Production Measures

Measures how the nervous system, muscles, and limbs produce a performance outcome, such as EEG, EMG, force, or limb kinematics.

3
New cards

Reaction Time (RT)

Time between the presentation of the go signal and the initiation of movement.

4
New cards

Movement Time (MT)

Time between the initiation and termination of movement.

5
New cards

Response Time

Total time from the go signal to movement completion; RT plus MT.

6
New cards

Foreperiod

Time between the warning signal and the go signal.

7
New cards

Simple Reaction Time

One stimulus and one required response.

8
New cards

Choice Reaction Time

Multiple stimuli, each requiring a different specified response.

9
New cards

Discrimination Reaction Time

Multiple stimuli but only one requires a response; the others require no response.

10
New cards

RT and MT Relationship

Reaction time does not necessarily predict movement time, and movement time does not necessarily predict reaction time.

11
New cards

Fractionated Reaction Time (FRT)

Uses EMG to divide reaction time into premotor time and motor time.

12
New cards

Premotor Time (PRMOT)

Time between stimulus presentation and the first change in EMG activity.

13
New cards

Motor Time (MOT)

Time between the first change in EMG activity and the initiation of movement.

14
New cards

Purpose of FRT

Helps identify whether reaction-time changes are due to cognitive processes or mechanical features of the limbs.

15
New cards

Absolute Error (AE)

Magnitude of error without regard to direction.

16
New cards

Constant Error (CE)

Signed deviation from the target that indicates directional error or bias.

17
New cards

Variable Error (VE)

Variability of performance across attempts, calculated from the dispersion of constant error scores.

18
New cards

Radial Error

Error measure for two-dimensional actions based on distance from the target.

19
New cards

Measures error between a produced performance curve and a criterion curve over time, such as in tracking tasks.

Root-Mean-Squared Error (RMSE)

20
New cards

Kinematics

Description of motion without regard to force or mass.

21
New cards

Displacement

Change in spatial location during movement.

22
New cards

Velocity

Rate of change in position with respect to time.

23
New cards

Acceleration

Rate of change in velocity during movement.

24
New cards

Kinetics

Study of forces as causes of motion.

25
New cards

Kinetic Measuring Tools

Force plates and strain gauges.

26
New cards

Electromyography (EMG)

Measures electrical activity in muscles.

27
New cards

Electroencephalography (EEG)

Measures electrical activity in the brain.

28
New cards

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Measures concentrations of positron-emitting radioisotopes in body tissues.

29
New cards

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Visualizes brain function through changes in fluid flow, including blood flow.

30
New cards

Lesion Studies

Removal of brain tissue to examine its effect on function, performed on laboratory animals.

31
New cards

Action Preparation

Events in the nervous system from the intention to act until initiation of the action.

32
New cards

Reaction Time as Preparation Index

Reaction time is used as an index of the preparation required to produce an action.

33
New cards

Cognitive Level of Action Preparation

Includes deciding to act, developing a general plan, and adding movement details.

34
New cards

Neuromotor Level of Action Preparation

Involves CNS structures responsible for planning and executing an action.

35
New cards

Decision to Act

Action preparation begins with an intention or decision driven by internal goals or environmental demands.

36
New cards

Developing a General Plan

An action plan is developed using previous experience and evaluation of the situation.

37
New cards

Adding Details to an Action Plan

Selecting movement parameters, body parts, and relevant environmental characteristics.

38
New cards

Movement Parameters

Details such as force, velocity, and displacement selected for an action.

39
New cards

Hick's Law

Reaction time increases logarithmically as the number of response choices increases; RT = K log(N + 1).

40
New cards

K in Hick's Law

Represents simple reaction time in the lecture's formula.

41
New cards

N in Hick's Law

Represents the number of response choices.

42
New cards

Response Predictability

As the predictability of the correct response increases, reaction time decreases.

43
New cards

Precue Correctness

Probability that advance information about the correct response is accurate.

44
New cards

50/50 Precue Probability

No preference toward either response when the two alternatives are equally likely.

45
New cards

Unequal Precue Probability

The performer develops a bias toward the response with a higher probability.

46
New cards

Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Reaction time is faster when the relationship between stimulus and response is compatible.

47
New cards

Stroop Effect

Conflicting stimulus information interferes with the required response.

48
New cards

Foreperiod Length Regularity

A consistent foreperiod across simple RT trials generally decreases reaction time.

49
New cards

Movement Complexity

Reaction time increases as the number of component parts in a movement increases.

50
New cards

Movement Accuracy

Greater accuracy demands increase movement preparation time.

51
New cards

Movement Repetition

Repeating the same movement across trials generally decreases reaction time on later trials.

52
New cards

Alertness

Being alert and attentive reduces movement initiation time.

53
New cards

Attentional Focus During Preparation

Reaction time decreases when the performer focuses on the signal rather than the movement.

54
New cards

Four CNS Areas in Action Planning

Limbic system, association cortex, projection system, and spinal system.

55
New cards

Limbic System

Responsible for the intention to act according to environmental demands.

56
New cards

Limbic System Structures

Fornix, amygdala, hippocampus, and cingulate gyrus.

57
New cards

Association Cortex

Analyzes intentions generated by the limbic system and transforms them into general action plans.

58
New cards

Association Cortex Functions

Recognition, selection, and integration of relevant sensory input.

59
New cards

Projection System

Determines how an action should be carried out by adding movement dynamics to fit environmental constraints.

60
New cards

Projection System Structures

Includes sensory and motor cortical areas, basal ganglia, and cerebellum.

61
New cards

Spinal System

Regulates timing of muscle activation patterns and fine-tunes action execution.

62
New cards

Feedback Loops in Action Planning

Allow the CNS to modify movement by comparing the produced action with the intended goal.

63
New cards

Attention

Engagement in perceptual, cognitive, and motor activities before, during, and after motor-skill performance.

64
New cards

Conscious Attention

Attention activities that a person can consciously identify and verbally describe.

65
New cards

Perceptual Attention

Attention directed toward sensory information, such as what a person sees.

66
New cards

Cognitive Attention

Attention directed toward thinking and mental processing.

67
New cards

Motor Attention

Attention directed toward movement activity.

68
New cards

Non-Conscious Attention

Attention activities that are difficult to describe verbally but are evident during skill performance.

69
New cards

Automaticity

Performance showing evidence of non-conscious attentional activity.

70
New cards

Limited Attention Capacity

A limited amount of attention is available for performing activities simultaneously.

71
New cards

Central Resource Theory

Proposes one central supply of attentional resources shared among attention

72
New cards

Fixed Attention Capacity

The amount of available attention remains constant.

73
New cards

Flexible Attention Capacity

The amount of available attention varies across situations.

74
New cards

Kahneman's Flexible Central Resource Theory

Proposes that available attention capacity varies with arousal level.

75
New cards

Arousal Level

A person's excitability involving emotional, mental, and physiological states.

76
New cards

Maximum Attention Capacity

Occurs at the optimal arousal level for the situation.

77
New cards

Arousal-Performance Relationship

Performance is highest near an optimal arousal level and lower at very low or very high arousal.

78
New cards

Task Demands for Attention

Attention requirements are task-specific and change with skill learning.

79
New cards

Enduring Dispositions

Involuntary allocation of attention.

80
New cards

Momentary Intentions

Intentional allocation of attention.

81
New cards

Attention Allocation Policy

Distribution of available attention among tasks demanding attention.

82
New cards

Multiple Resources Theory

Proposes attention resources from multiple sources rather than one shared supply.

83
New cards

Wickens

Researcher associated with Multiple Resources Theory (1980, 1992).

84
New cards

Three Sources of Multiple Resources

Input/output modalities, stages of information processing, and codes of information processing.

85
New cards

Input/Output Modalities

Resource categories involving modalities such as vision and speech.

86
New cards

Stages of Information Processing

Perception, memory encoding, and response output.

87
New cards

Codes of Processing Information

Verbal and spatial codes.

88
New cards

Dual-Task Procedure

Assesses attention demands by having a person perform two tasks simultaneously.

89
New cards

Primary Task

Main task that the participant is instructed to perform normally.

90
New cards

Secondary Task

Additional task used to assess the attention demands of the primary task.

91
New cards

Geurts and Mulder (1994)

Studied standing balance and attention demands in unilateral leg amputees with a new prosthesis and non-amputees.

92
New cards

Geurts and Mulder Primary Task

Maintaining standing balance for 30 seconds.

93
New cards

Geurts and Mulder Secondary Task

Verbally determining whether addition problem sums were correct or incorrect.

94
New cards

Geurts and Mulder Results

Amputees showed increased body sway and arithmetic errors; non-amputees showed no body sway change.

95
New cards

Prezuhy and Etnier (2001)

Studied attention demands during different phases of horseshoe pitching.

96
New cards

Prezuhy and Etnier Primary Task

Pitching a horseshoe from 37 feet.

97
New cards

Prezuhy and Etnier Secondary Task

Responding to a tone by pressing a button in the non-throwing hand

98
New cards

Prezuhy and Etnier Measurement Points

Beginning of movement, maximum backswing, and just before release.

99
New cards

Prezuhy and Etnier Results

Secondary-task reaction time was highest just before release.

100
New cards

Strayer and Johnson (2001)

Studied effects of cell-phone conversations during simulated driving.