1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Solley (1959) two step stab study
speed vs. accuracy vs. speedy accuracy
Instruction leaves a lasting effect on both performance and learning
Bilodeau 1959 lever experiment
KR research
no KR group did not learn anything & did not help performance
Sherwood 1988 Rapid Arm Movement Study
bandwidth feedback
study w/ feedback given only if performance was outside of % goal
similar to fading
less frequent, broader bandwidth (ex. 10% instead of 5%, 0%) can be more effective
Janelle 2013 throwing study
self-controlled feedback
self-controlled group asked for feedback in beginning and then asked for feedback to confirm success
ranked best to worst: self-controlled, summary (every 5 trials), yoked, control/KR only
Weinstein & Schmitt crutch experiment
why terminal feedback = better than concurrent feedback
Fading technique
winstein et al. might be different than winstein
Trowbridge 1931 drawing study
Precise KR is better in practice and learning
nonsense KR is worse in practice and learning (compared to precise & right/wrong KR)
Posner and Keele 1969 fixed central resource model
There is a single, central reserve of resources for which all activities compete that is fixed
Kahneman 1973 flexible central resource model
There is a single, central reserve for which all activities compete that is flexible
arousal refers to inverted U theory
Geurts 1994 static stand balance experiment
Amputees increased body sways and arithmetic errors; non-amputees showed no body sway/change
It is common for people to find it difficult to perform multiple tasks at a time
A learner's state of arousal affects how much attention capacity they have
When learner's progress through the stages of learning, attentional demands drop and more of the pool is available for using
Prezuhy 2001 horseshoe experiment
Reaction time was the highest during parts 1 and 3 of the throw (beginning and just before release)
It is common for people to find it difficult to perform multiple tasks at a time
A learner's state of arousal affects how much attention capacity they have
When learner's progress through the stages of learning, attentional demands drop and more of the pool is available for using
Fitt’s Law
Movement time & index of difficulty increase together
Piek 2008 study of motor and cognitive ability
Social economic status was found to affect intellectual status and fine motor performance
Early gross motor abilities were associated with later cognitive development
Seattle 2004 Longitudinal Study
supports total intellectual decline (gradual, consistent and pervasive decline occurs in overall intellectual ability throughout adult years)
subjects increased in performance until late 30s-early 40s then plateaued by mid 50s-early 60s
Barnes 2003 cardiovascular fitness and cognitive function study
cardiovascular fitness assessed at the beginning of the study, predicted cognitive function 6 years later
Anrieieva 2019 physical activity and biological age study
physical activity is neuro-protective in older adults
resistance training programs impact cognition
experiment group had 8.7-year older chronological age
control group had 5.5-year older biological age
Kernodle & Carlton 1992 sponge ball throw study
mostly KP, some KR
video and instructional feedback leads to the best performance