1/65
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Dual Representation
Being able to flexibility switch between treating objects as an object and as a symbol
Symbolic Representation
Knowing that an object could represent another object (e.g., a map representing a room)
Develops around 3 years old
Conclusion on DeLoache’s Studies
2-year-olds could solve the “shrinking room” task if doing so did not rely on dual representation
Symbolic Understanding
The understanding that things can stand for or represent other things
Pretend Play
Helpful for: Executive functioning, language, socio-emotional reasoning
Taylor & Carlson (1997): Found that those children with imaginary friends outperformed against children w/o them in terms of executive functions
Egocentrism
Inability to view other people’s perspectives
→ Ex: Piaget’s mountain task, where children couldn’t imagine the mountains from the doll’s POV until ~age 7
Animistic Thinking
Over attributing human attributes to things that are inanimate
Essentialism
The idea that members of a category all have some inner “essence” that causes them to be a member of that category
→ E.g., a cat has special “cat genes” that make it cat-like
Properties of Essentialism:
→ Fixed at birth (a cat raised by dogs will still be a cat)
→ Underlying structure (if one cat has something, all cats have it)
Conservation
Understanding that an amount stays the same even when its shape or appearance changes.
Why do conservation errors occur?
Centration: focusing on one salient feature of an object (e.g., focused on how long the row is opposed to the number of objects in the row)
Lack of reversibility: poor understanding that objects can be transformed back into the original state
Appearance-Reality Tasks (Flavell, 1986)
Tests of whether kids can tell the difference between what something looks like and what it actually is.
Kids look at white milk through green glasses.
→ 3-4 yrs: think it really is green
→ 5-6 yrs: know it only looks green and is still white
Future Thinking Words
2-3 years: Children start using words like “tomorrow” or “yesterday”
Counterfactual Reasoning
3-4 years of age: Reasoning about events that could have happened but didn’t
Harris, German & Mills (1996): What would happen if you took your shoes off when you went through the door?
→ Children would say something along the lines of your kitchen would not get dirty
Over-Determined Counterfactuals
Children don’t yet have the idea to do this
An outcome has more than one cause, and each cause alone would’ve been enough to make it happen.
Planning
Usually measured using the Tower of London Task (Shallice, 1982; Berg & Byrd, 2002)
→ Board looks like this, then asks them to make it look a certain way in a certain number of moves, which forces them to think ahead
→ develops around 4-5
Planning (Future)
Scenario: Imagine you’re walking into an cold environment, what would you need to bring? (mittens, ice cubes, ruler)
→ 5-year-olds: select correct items to plan for the future
→ < 5-year-olds: select semantic matches (things associated with the scene, but aren't useful for them)
Episodic Foresight/Future Thinking
Picturing yourself in a future situation so you can plan or prepare for it now.
5-year-olds (and adults) continue to struggle with this
Scenario: 3-5-year-olds ate salty pretzels and got thirsty.
→ Asked what they want now → water
→ Asked what they want tomorrow → still water
Takeaway: how kids feel now shapes what they think they’ll want later. 5-year-olds did a little better, but most still picked water.
Timeline Placement
Preschoolers showed no difference in preference for right vs. left or top vs. bottom (Tillman & Barner, 2016)
Logarithmic thinking
Our minds stretch out things that are close to us and squish together things that are far away.
→ Ex: people place marriage, retirement, and death close together on a timeline, since they’re all far from now.
→ 5-year-olds: can tell past from future, but not near future from distant future (both feel like “later”)
Ability to map events
Ability to place events on a map develops between 3-6:
→ 3-year-olds: no trouble with differentiating past events, but had trouble with future events
→ 5-year-olds: differentiated between both past and future events
Inhibitory Control
The ability to follow rules while inhibiting impulses
Gestard et al. (1994): told them to say “night” when they saw a card with a sun, while “day” for a card with a moon
→ 3 year olds were terrible, 5 year olds were better
Dimensional Card Sort Task
Tests cognitive flexibility, the ability to switch rules and approaches to problems
Delay of Gratification
Resisting immediate temptation to get rewards later on
Kids choose between 1 marshmallow now or 2 marshmallows if they wait for the experimenter to come back.
→ Older kids wait longer.
→ Kids who waited longer did better later in life
Working Memory
Ability to hold multiple things/information at once
→ Adults: remember about 7 items
→ 4-year-olds: remember about 4 items
…BUT, adults do just as poorly with unfamiliar items
→ As words become familiar to us, we use up less processing space, thus freeing up storage space
Kidd, Palmieri, & Aslin (2012): Rational Snacking
Children who were placed into unreliable environments waited for much less than those in reliable ones
Two Theories on Working Memory Changes
Total operating space increases
As words become familiar to us, we use up less processing space, thus freeing up storage space
Long-term memory
Procedural memories + Declarative memories
→ Declarative split into semantic memories (general knowledge) & episodic memories (personal recollections)
Infantile Amnesia
People typically can’t recall anything that happened before the ages of 3-4
Earliest Memories
Happen around ages 3-5
Happen at earlier ages in:
→ Cultures that discuss memories a lot
→ Cultures that discuss emotions a lot
Often have emotional and/or negative content
Forgetting & Remembering
With age:
→ Forgetting decreases
→ Memories become more specific
→ Children become less suggestible
Theory of Mind
The ability to understand others may have beliefs, perspectives, and desires different than one’s own
Wimmer & Perner (1983): False beliefs
The ability to recognize that another person can hold a belief that differs from reality.
Overregularization
Incorrectly applying already known rules to new words
→ Ex: I goed to the store.
Gricean Maxims
Maxim of Quality: Be truthful
Maxim of Quantity: Don’t talk for too long or for too little
Maxim of Relation: Be Relevant
Maxim of Manner: Be Clear
Code-Related Skills
Understanding how written language represents spoken language and how print works.
Critical Components of Early Reading
Identifying letters
Understanding conventions of print
Language comprehension skills
Cognitive control
Working memory
Early Math
Nonsymbolic math (math without symbols or verbal labels) begins in infancy
Symbolic counting (math with symbols or verbal labels) develops during the preschool years
Symbolic Counting Stages
Counting without Meaning
Memorizing/knowing what “one”, “two”, or “three” looks like
Understanding the cardinality principle; proficient counting (the final number word spoken represents the total quantity of objects)
Marker for not being two knower yet
Not bringing two items when asked for two
2. When asked for a different number, they give 2 instead
Cultural Universals?
Tsimane
→ Piantadosi et al. (2014): Protracted educational attainment, so protracted counting
* Go through same stages (0, 1, 2, 3, etc.), but takes longer compared to other countries
Piraha
→ No linguistic words for numbers above 2
Generic Language
Language that describe a category as a whole rather than referring to specific individuals
Generics have Consequences
Increased stereotyping
Lead to beliefs that the other group shares the opposite view (Moty & Rhodes, 2021)
→ “Boys are good at sports” implies girls are not
Leads to increased essentialism (start believing properties are fixed at birth)
Working Memory Total Operating Space Consists of What?
Total operating space = processing space + storage space
Breastfeeding
Linked to: higher IQ, lower obesity, fewer negative health outcomes
But very few experimental studies
Takeaway: the benefits may come from SES, not breastfeeding itself.
How do we get children to eat healthy foods?
Frequent exposures (Menella et al., 2020)
Some taste preferences develop in utero
Creative preparation (Anzman-Frasca et al., 2012)
Relaxed environment at meal time (Birch et al., 2003)
Eating healthy foods yourself (Fisher et al., 2001)
“Dressing Up” Healthy Food
Sullivan & Birch (1990): children presented with sweet or salty tofu
→ Got children to eat more of that specific food, but it didn’t help them generalize tofu
Why do Children Develop Disgust Reactions?
Kids got two identical foods, but one had been “sneezed on”.
→ 3-4 yrs: no difference. They ate the sneezed-on food just as much.
→ 5-8 yrs: avoided the contaminated food and ate more of the clean one.
Should we Describe Food as Healthy?
5-6-year-olds saw foods labeled “healthy,” “unhealthy,” or neutral.
→ “Unhealthy” vs. neutral: kids avoided the “unhealthy” food.
→ “Healthy” vs. neutral: no difference. The “healthy” label didn’t make kids want it more.
Changes in Sleep Patterns
Less napping
Less REM sleep (from 50% as infants to 20% as children)
How do we get children to sleep more?
Consistent routines (Sadeh et a., 2009)
Consistent parenting (Staples et al., 2015)
Maltreatment
<1% of children are maltreated, though rates are declining
→ Neglect is the most common form
4 Types of Abuse
Neglect: failure to meet children’s basic needs
Emotional abuse: hampering emotional needs
Physical abusive: intentional harm
Sexual abuse: attempts or actual sexual contact
Types of Stress
Positive: brief spikes in heart rate and mild stress hormones. Ex: first day of school, getting a shot.
Tolerable: serious but temporary stress, buffered by supportive relationships. Ex: a loved one dying, with caring adults around.
Toxic: prolonged stress activation without protective relationships. Ex: ongoing abuse or neglect.
Vaccination
Claimed 8 of 12 kids showed autism signs soon after the MMR vaccine. It was never replicated, and multiple studies found no link.
Explicit Reasoning
Conscious, explicitly stated
→ Relies on verbal report
→ Subject to self-presentational strategies (e.g., telling experimenters what they want to hear)
→ Can risk underestimating reasoning
Implicit Reasoning
Subconscious, not explicitly stated
→ Relies on non-verbal report (behavioral)
→ Not as subject to self-presentational strategies
→ Can risk overestimating reasoning
Lawrence Kohlberg
Expanded on Piaget's stage-like theories
Believed moral reasoning was about independent thinking, beyond the constraints of the law and social groups
Kohlberg’s Stages
Level 1: Pre-conventional: right and wrong come from rewards and punishment.
→ Stage 1, punishment: avoid doing wrong to avoid getting in trouble.
→ Stage 2, self-interest: “what’s in it for me?” trades.
Level 2: Conventional: right and wrong come from social approval and rules.
→ Stage 3, good relationships: be good and liked, judge actions by good intentions.
→ Stage 4, law and order: follow rules and laws to keep society working, as a duty.
Level 3: Post-conventional: right and wrong come from justice, rights, and universal ethics.
→ Stage 5, social contract: people have different values and rights, and laws can be changed to serve people.
→ Stage 6, universal principles: follow universal ethics. Laws only count if they’re just, and unjust laws can be disobeyed.
Criticisms of Kohlberg
Western, educated model
Culturally-specific
May underestimate:
→ Young children
→ Women (different moral orientation–ethics of “care”)
→ Non-educated people
Relies too much on explicit reasoning
Measuring moral reasoning implicitly
Chernyal & Sobel (2015): children collaborated with puppet and then puppet knocked over a tower either accidentally or intentionally.
→ Children were much more likely to punish puppet if they did it intentionally compared to accidentally
Moral vs. Social-Conventional Domain
Smetana & Braeges (1982): children have some type of distinction between moral and social conventions
How Do Children Understand Emotions? (Stages)
Stages:
Distinguishing based on valence (good vs. bad emotions)
Distinguishing based on extreme arousal (extreme vs. mild emotions)
→ A little upset vs, downright distraught
Distinguishing based on at non-extreme arousal
→ Tense vs. nervous, stressed vs. depressed
Emotion Understanding Achievements
Towards the end of the preschool period (~ages 5-6), children can:
→ Understand mixed emotions (being nervous and excited)
→ Understand real vs. apparent emotions
→ Understand emotions when they conflict with their own
By 3 years, children can:
→ Predict emotions other people have
→ Predict actions follow from emotions
How Do We Support Emotion Understanding?
Tarullo et al. (2016): emotion talk predicts emotional understanding
→ Kids whose adoptive parents used more emotion talk had emotional understanding similar to the control group
Culturally Variability in Emotion
Wang et al. (2010): European American vs. Chinese parents
→ European American parents use more internal state language (feelings, thoughts), attributions, and explanations.
→ Their kids have earlier first memories, linked to the emotional content.
Chinese kids develop ToM a bit later, but catch up eventually.
Lu et al. (2009): Experiment
→ Kids who practiced predicting what would happen next in stories scored higher on ToM than controls.
Nso People of Cameroon
Kids are taught self-restraint and emotional control from early on.
They did much better on the marshmallow test (Lamm et al., 2018)