Canadian Criminal Law: Bail, Actus Reus, and Mens Rea

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/50

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

51 Terms

1
New cards

Is it lawful to jail people in Canada before trial?

Yes, but subject to strict legal rules, Charter rights, and bail provisions.

2
New cards

What is the restraint principle in bail under s. 493.1?

Accused should be released as soon as possible, on the lowest form of release and fewest conditions necessary.

3
New cards

What types of conditions are allowed under s. 493.1?

Only conditions necessary to address bail risk; they are never punitive or therapeutic.

4
New cards

What does s. 493.2 list as special considerations for bail?

Public safety, respect for courts/rule of law, and public confidence in the administration of justice.

5
New cards

What does Section 11(e) of the Charter guarantee?

The right not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause.

6
New cards

What is R. v. Antic?

A landmark SCC ruling confirming the right to reasonable bail, presumption of innocence, and the ladder principle.

7
New cards

What is the presumption of innocence in bail?

The overarching consideration that accused people are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

8
New cards

Who can release an accused person at the police station?

Police officers under s. 498, unless public interest requires detention.

9
New cards

Who decides release if an accused is held for a bail hearing?

A presiding justice (justice of the peace in Ontario, judges elsewhere) under s. 515(2).

10
New cards

What is a 'consent release'?

A release where the Crown agrees to terms negotiated between counsel, making up the majority of releases.

11
New cards

What is the lowest level of release under s. 515(1)?

Release without conditions, except an undertaking to attend court.

12
New cards

What is a surety in bail law?

A responsible person who agrees to supervise the accused and pledge money, risking forfeiture if conditions are breached.

13
New cards

Who typically acts as a surety?

Parents, family members, friends, or co-workers who know the accused well and have no criminal record.

14
New cards

What is Bail Verification and Supervision?

A community program providing basic supervision for vulnerable accused who cannot find a surety.

15
New cards

When can financial cash deposits be used in bail?

Only rarely, as a last resort; denying bail due to poverty violates the Charter (R. v. Antic).

16
New cards

What are primary grounds for bail detention (s. 515(10)(a))?

To ensure the accused attends court.

17
New cards

What are secondary grounds for bail detention (s. 515(10)(b))?

To protect the public, prevent reoffending, or stop interference with the administration of justice.

18
New cards

What are tertiary grounds for bail detention (s. 515(10)(c))?

To maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.

19
New cards

What factors are considered under tertiary grounds?

Strength of prosecution's case, gravity, firearm use, potential lengthy imprisonment, and outstanding charges.

20
New cards

What is the standard onus in bail hearings?

The Crown bears the onus to 'show cause' why detention is justified (s. 515(1)-(2)).

21
New cards

What is a 'reverse onus' provision?

A situation where the onus is on the accused to show cause why their detention is not justified (s. 515(6)).

22
New cards

What is the most common reason for a reverse onus?

If the accused is already on bail and alleged to have committed a new offence.

23
New cards

What are other examples triggering a reverse onus?

Non-residents of Canada, IPV offences with a history, violent weapons offences with a record, and s.469 offences.

24
New cards

How are s. 469 offences treated in bail?

Mandatory initial detention, superior court application required, reverse onus, and the ladder principle does not apply.

25
New cards

What does a reverse onus require post-Bill C-14?

Accused must clearly demonstrate that their proposed release plan addresses the risks related to s. 515(10) grounds.

26
New cards

What happens if bail conditions are breached?

Accused can be arrested for a new offence, breach of term (s. 145(5)), or Crown revocation (s. 524).

27
New cards

What is an Estreat hearing?

A special superior court hearing (s. 770-771) to order forfeiture of previously pledged bail money.

28
New cards

Who defines the actus reus of a crime?

Statutes enacted by Parliament, with the sole common law exception being contempt of court.

29
New cards

How does the judiciary interpret ambiguous criminal statutes?

Strictly construed to favour the liberty of the accused.

30
New cards

What is the 'void for vagueness' doctrine?

If a law is too vague to provide a clear risk zone, it may violate Section 7 of the Charter.

31
New cards

What does 'de minimis non curat lex' mean?

Trivial or minimal acts are not the concern of the criminal law.

32
New cards

Are sexual assault and intimate partner violence ever considered trivial?

No, the SCC has established they are never trivial under de minimis.

33
New cards

Is a mistake of law a valid defence?

No, under s. 19 mistake of law is not a defence, though it may mitigate a sentence.

34
New cards

What are the exceptions where a mistake of law excuses liability?

If induced by an official responsible for administering the law, or via 'colour of right' for specific property offences.

35
New cards

Why is voluntariness required for actus reus?

Under s. 7, a crime requires a voluntary act—the result of a willing mind at liberty to make a choice.

36
New cards

What are examples of non-volitional acts?

Heart attacks, seizures, sleepwalking, automatism, or severe involuntary intoxication (e.g., R. v. Brown).

37
New cards

What is the general causation test for crimes?

The Smithers test: was the accused's act a contributing cause outside the de minimis range?

38
New cards

What is the 'thin skull' rule in criminal causation?

The accused must take their victim as they find them, including any unforeseeable vulnerabilities.

39
New cards

What causation test applies to murder?

The R. v. Nette test: the accused's conduct must be a 'significant contributing cause' of death.

40
New cards

Can an omission qualify as an actus reus?

Yes, if there is a legal duty to act (e.g., parents, medical professionals, workplace managers) and a failure to fulfill it.

41
New cards

What is the difference between parties and accessories?

Parties help commit the crime (aiding/abetting/counselling); accessories assist after the fact under s. 463.

42
New cards

What constitutes an 'attempt' to commit a crime?

Going beyond mere preparation to commit an offence.

43
New cards

What is the definition of conspiracy in criminal law?

An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime (s. 465).

44
New cards

What is mens rea?

The 'guilty mind' or fault element required for a criminal offence.

45
New cards

Is motive the same as intent?

No. Motive is the 'why' behind an offense, and the Crown is almost never required to prove it.

46
New cards

What are the four levels of subjective awareness?

1. Full intention, 2. Knowledge, 3. Wilful blindness, 4. Recklessness.

47
New cards

What is wilful blindness?

A legal substitute for knowledge where a person suspects a fact but deliberately avoids inquiring to maintain deniability.

48
New cards

What is recklessness as a fault element?

Actual awareness of a risk that a consequence may follow, choosing to proceed in the face of that risk.

49
New cards

What is objective mens rea?

Fault assessed based on what a reasonable person would have foreseen, without requiring proof of actual intention.

50
New cards

How is objective fault measured across departures?

Slight departure = careless (civil standard, not criminal); marked departure = dangerous driving; marked and substantial departure = criminal negligence.

51
New cards

What is R. v. Javanmardi about?

A naturopath whose patient died; the SCC held that criminal negligence requires a marked and substantial departure from the reasonable standard of care.