1/58
chapters 10, 13, and 14
incremental cash flow
the difference between a firm’s future cash flows with a project and those without the project
the standard principle
the assumption that evaluation of a project may be based on the project’s incremental cash flows
incremental cash flows
sunk cost
opportunity cost
erosion
net working capital
sunk cost
a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be removed and therefore should not be considered in an investment decision
opportunity cost
the most valuable alternative that is given up if a particular investment is undertaken
erosion
the cash flows of a new project that comes at the expense of a firm’s existing project
How does net working capital change over the course of a project
at the start you pay into it to start the project
at the end it’s recovered since the project is now completed
do we include financing costs in cash flows
no, they should be analyzed seperatly (includes interest paid)
pro forma financial statements
financial statements projecting future years’ operations
in a pro forma financial statement do you recognize interest expense
no because interest expense is a financing expense not an operating expense
asset’s 3 components
operating cash flows
capital spending
changes in net working capital
project cash flow formula
project CF = operating CF - change in net working capital - capital spending
formula for project operating cash flow
op CF = EBIT + Depreciation - taxes
what happens to taxes if we sell and the market value is grater than the book value
pay taxed on the difference between them because it represents the excess depreciation that should have been paid (paid too little on taxes earlier now have to pay it)
What happens to taxes if we sell and the market value is less than the book vaue
we ca get tax savings instead o paying more (paid too much at the start, get it back now)
what are some alternative ways to find OP CF
bottom-up approach
top down approach
tax shield approach
what is the bottom up approach to find OCF
start at NI (bottom) and add back non-cash deductions
OCF = NI + Depreciation
what is the top down approach to find OCF
most obvious way to calculate OCF
OCF = Sales - Cost - Taxes
what is the Tax shield approach to finding OCF
OCF = (sales * cost) x (1 - TC) + Depreciation x TC
2 parts:
what cash flows would be if there were no depreceation expense
depreciation times the tax rate
expected return
the return on a risky asset expected in the future
formula for risk premium
risk premium = expected return - risk-free rate
portfolios
a group of assets such as stocks and bonds held by an investor
portfolio weights
the percentage of a portfolio’s total value that is invested in a particular asset
how to calculate portfolio expected returns
E(Rp) = x1 * E(R1) + x2 * E(R2) + … + xi * E(Rn)
n = any number
xi = % of money in assets
possible sources for unexpected returns information
news about flyers research
government figures released on the GDP
results from the latest arms control talks
news that sales figures are higher than expected
sudden unexpected drop in interest rates
how to find total returns
total return = expected return + unexpected return
R = E +U(R)
systematic risk
a risk influenced large number of assets (market risk)
unsystematic risk
a risk that affects at most a small number of assets (unique or asset-specified risk)
the principle of diversification
spreading an investment across a number of assets will eliminate some, but not all of the risk
how do we reduce risk in a portfolio
by diversifying stock, unsystematic risk can be eliminated, it reduces risk by only a certain amount
the systematic risk principle
the expected return on a risky asset depends only on the asset’s systematic risk
beta coefficient
the amount of systematic risk present in a particular risky asset relative to that in an average asset
classification of beta risks measures
risk of 1 relevant to itself
.5, half as much risk as average
2 twice the risk compared to average
reward-to-risk ratio formula
slope = E(Ra) - Rf / Ba
the security market line (SML)
positively sloped straight line displaying the relationship between expected return and beta
SML slope formula
SML slope = [E(Rm) - Re] / Bm
market risk premium
slope of SML which is the difference between the expected portfolio and the risk-free rate
capital asset pricing model (LAPM)
the equation of the SML showing the relationship between expected return and beta
LAPM formula
E(Ri) = Rf + [E(Rm) - Rf] * Bi
expected return for an asset depends on 3 things
the pure time value of money
the reward for bearing systematic risk
the amount of systematic risk
alpha
the excess of return an asset earns based on the level of risk taken
to accept an investment:
the expected return should be no worse than what financial markets offer for the same risk
the cost of capital
the minimum required return on a new investment (firm needs to earn this to break even)
cost of equity
the return that equity investors require on their investment in the firm
dividend growth method approach formula
Re = D1 / P0 + g
advantages and disadvantages of dividend growth model
advantages
it is simplistic
disadvantages
only applicable to companies that pay dividends and dividends grow at a constant rate
very sensitive to estimated growth rate
does not explicitly cover risk
approaches to find cost of equity
dividend growth model
the SML approach
3 things the return on risky investment depend on
the risk-free rate of Rf
market risk premium E(Rm)-Rf
systematic risk of the asset relative to the average B
SML approach formula
Re = Rf + Be * (Rm - Rf)
advantages and disadvantages of the SML approach
advantages
adjusts for risk
applicable to companies without steady dividend growth
disadvantages
need estimates on B and market risk premium
rely on past to predict the future
cost of debt (Rd)
return that lenders require on the firm’s debt
formula for the market value of the firm’s equity
E = number of shares outstanding * price per share
formula for the market value of the firm’s debt
D = market price of bond * number of bonds outstanding
formula for value in weighted average cost of capital
V = E + D
can divide both sides by V to get % of total capital represented by D and E
use market value unless privately owned or can’t get an estimate
for WACC does the discount rate need to be before or after tax
needs to be after tax since we’re concerned with the after-tax cash flow
after tax rate formula
after tax rate = Rd * (1-TC)
weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
the weighted average cost of equity and the after tax cost of debt
WACC formula
WACC = (E/V) x Re + (D/V) x Rd x (1-TC)
if there is preferred stock involved add (P/V) x Rp before debt value
what are some possible draw backs to using WACC as a cutoff for projects
reject profitable projects with risks less than the overall firm
my accept overly risky projects because the WACC will look attractive