1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
dyslipidemia
abnormal amount of lipids (fats) or lipoproteins in your blood
high low-densitiy lipoprotein (LDL) - bad cholesterol
high triglycerides
low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) - good cholesterol
obesity leads to increased risk of
all cause and CV disease mortality
insulin resistance
type 2 diabetes
heart disease
hypertension
dyslipidemia
metabollically healthy obesity
describes people who have obesity but lack the usual metabolic complications, such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, or abnormal blood lipids
common features of metabolically healthy obesity
fat stored mostly in subcutaneous depots rather than visceral or liver fat
healthier, more functional adipose tissue with less macrophage infiltration and lower inflammation
higher cardiorespiratory fitness
metabolically abnormal obese charactersitics
high fat mass
low insulin sensitivity
high ectopic fat
high triglycerides
high inflammation
low HDL-cholesterol
high intima-media thickness - thick carotid artery wall, atherosclerosis (plaque buildup)
metabolically healthy obese characteristics
high fat mass
high insulin sensitvity
low ectopic fat
low triglyceriddes
low inflammation
high HDL-cholesterol
low intima-media thickness
modified balke treadmill test to predict VO2 max
enter information from test (speed, and incline achieved) into reference equations to estimate VO2max
fitness expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs)
1 MET = 3.5 ml/kg/min
ex. 42 ml/kg/min = 12 METs
vo2 max
maximal rate of O2 consumption by the body
reflects highest rate of oxidative metabolism
determinants of VO2max
o2 delivery to muscles - CV system
O2 utlization by muscles - mitochondrial content
aboslute Vo2 max
L/min or ml/min
relative Vo2 max
ml/kg/min - factors in weight
metabolically healthy obese people have higher
CRF than metabolically abnormal obese
metabolically healthy obese have relatively similar hazard ratios for all-cause disease mortality, CV disease mortality, non-fatal CV disease events as (no significant difference)
metabolically healthy normal weight
fitness vs fatness: unfit individuals have
twice the risk of mortality regardless of BMI
overweight and obese-ft indivduals have similar mortality risk as their
normal weight-fit individuals
fitness
best measurement of whole body healthy
having a higher VO2 peak is comparable to having
lower WC
lower plasma glucose
lower BP
survival rates are higher with
higher VO2 max
Wolrd fitness level - test yourself
“feasible and practically useful in primary care for identification of apparently healthy indivduals at increased risk or premature CVD disease and all-cause mortality”
VO2max is very important for
disease risk
for a given fitness level,
the metabolically healthy but obese phenotype is a benign condition (metabolically healthy obese and metabolically healthy normal fat indindivuals have similar prognosis
compensatory behavior in weightloss
automatic or deliberate actions - like eating more food or moving less - that quietly offset the calories you burn during exercise
contribution of physical activity to daily energy expenditure is
fairly low - most of it comes from BMR
predicted weight loss for a 200lb man running 60 min at a moderate-intensity 4x a week
5 lbs at most b/c 3500 calories needed to expend with exercise
dose response of exercise on weight loss in overweight/obese women
3 groups of women prescribed exercise at different intensisties (burning 113, 227, 340 kcal per session), longer durations, etc
weight loss was predicted to increase with intensity, but this was not true
the middle group had the most amount of weight loss
key note: as exercise volume increased, you are less likely to lose weight because a major effect of exercise is eating more in response
the more you exercise
the more you eat
exercsie compensation hypothesis
the body and behavior offset the energy deficit from exercise, so weight loss is less than predicted
automatic metabolic exercise compensation hypothesis
decreases RRE (resting energy expenditure) - because body mass is smaller, body dials down to conserve energy
increased appetite hormones - more hungry
decreased energy expenditure of exercise - the same workout costs fewer calories as you get lighter and more efficient
automatic behavioral exercise compensation hypothesis
decreased spontaneous activity - you move less without deciding for example from fatigue
volitional and behavioral exercise compensation hypothesis
increased energy intake. - eating more, rewarding yourself after a workout
redduced exercise compliance - skipping or shortening sessions
decreased non-exercise activity - choosing to sit more, take the elevator, etc.
Exercising in the morning
raises energy expenditure at the time, but participants move less later in the day, so net daily gain is smaller - represents exercise compensation - decreased spontaneous activity
in a study, participants who did not lost the expected weight with an exercise program reported
higher hunger - increased appetitie hormones like ghrelin can drive higher intake and offset the energy deficit from exercise
it is very easy to
out-eat exercise-induced energy expenditure
common compensatory health behavior
good health behaviors can offset bad ones - rewarding exercise with a sweet treat
decreased REE principle
When you lose weight, REE drops. Each kg lost is associated with a decrease in the calories your body burns at rest, so weight loss gets harder over time

obesity cycle explains how
focusing only on weight loss as a primary goal often fails because it keeps people stuck in a loop
the obesity cycle
public desiresweightloss → prescribe weight loss program → obesogenic environment → minimal weightloss → frustration → weight regain → discontinue
diet and exercise
diet can make a major difference in weight loss, the best method is to exercise and have a good diet
contribution of PA to Daily energy expnditure is
quite low
it is difficult to lose weight with exercise alone
there are often large differences between actual and predicted weight loss from exercise
numerous compensatory mechanisms (psyhoclogical and physiological)1
undermine exercise-induced weight loss
old obesity guidelines
focused solely on achieving weight loss - primary determinant of treatmnet efficacy
to become “disease-free” one is required to lose weight (achieve BMI under 30)
successful management targeted a weight loss ofa t least 10% with 3-5% weight loss as the minimal target for clinically meaningful benefit
new obesity guidelines
focus on improving patient health, not just weight loss
obesity is a chronic disease that requires long-term management
obesity management is more tahn reducing numbers on a scale - overall healtha nd well-being over the long term matters
important part of obesity management is identifying and addressing root causes for weight fain and removing road blocks
every individual defines success differently
work towards your “best” weight
GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1)
natural gut hormone to help control blood sugar, slow stomach emptying and reduce appetite
increases when you eat, act on hypothalamus to modify appetite, tells your brain that you’re full
obesity treatement has entered a new ear
prescription medications! - mimic natural hormone GLP-1
ozempic was
first used for type 2 diabetes because it was so good for monitoring blood sugar
GLP-1 function on pancreas
increased insulin secretion
increases new beta-cell formation
decreases beta-cell apoptosis (death)
decreased glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha-cells - help lower blood sugar levels after a meal
GLP-1 function on brain
increased neurogenesis - new neurons
increased satiety
decreased appetite
GLP-1 function on stomach
increased glucose uptake
decreased gastric emptying
GLP-1 function on liver
increased glycogen storage
contemporary obesity management medications produce
substantial weight loss - far greater than what is typically achieved through exercise alone
semaglutide (Ozempic/wegovy) ~ 15% weight loss in adults without Type 2
tirzepatide (mounjaro, zepbound) ~ 21% weight loss in adults without type 2
weight loss includes loss of lean tissue
~25-40% of weight lost with medication may be lean body mass
includes more than just skeletal muscle mass
could lead to impaired strength or physiical function
taking medications without exercise
is not good. - it is better to combine both, lifestyle is very important - there is evidence that the health benefits of weightloss are increased with exercise
even in the absence of substantial weight loss, exercise can lower wasit circumference
measures storage of adipose tissues - visceral - abdomincal fat is the most dangerous
during diet-induced restriction
resistance exercise blunts the loss of lean mass
keeping more lean mass helps hold up REE, counters decreased REE compensation from your earlier slide, makes weight regain less likely
when comparing three groups of different types of exercise in aiding weight loss
caloric intake was kept stable to reflect changes from exercise
aerobic and combined exercise had good results. Still, resistance and combined groups gained skeletal muscle mass
with resistance training, less weight lost is fat-free mass.
statistically significant difference between groups
preserving lean mass
helps maintain REE, which supports keeping weight off
even in overweight or obese indivduals, endurance training
remodels abdominal subtaneous adipose tissue - higher fitness
even with the same body fat, metabolically healthier fat profile (sedentary vs long-term endurance-trained adults with overweight or obesity) showed -VO2 peak (fitness)
better vascularization
less fibrosis and inflammation
more oxidative capacity
what does exercise show for capillary densitty
more capillaries per adipocyte - improves blood, oxygen, and nutrient flow
higher expression of lipogensis genes in exercise group suggests
greater capacity to store fat in subcutaneous tissue
exercise groups show lower pro-inflammatory macrophages, which suggests
less inflammation
higher expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes indciates
greater mitochondrial oxidative capacity (ATP production) in adipose tissue
biggest limitation of cross-sectioanl exercise study
cannot prove exercise causes differences, but it can show associations
exercise group shows lower levels of Col6a (collagen VI), which suggests
less fibrosis
we need to reframe how we thaink about exercise
has staggering benefits, will not always help much with just weightloss
exercise is not a weight loss drug
exercise would be the best prescription if obesity management focused on
reduced WC
maintain/increase muscle mass
decrease functional limitations
improve cardiorespiratory fitness
decrease cardiometabolic risk factors
improve adipose tissue and muscle health
body composition vs body weight alone
Weight doesn’t show how much or how healthy each tissue is
comp shows volume and quality of each tissue(adipose, lean, bone)