1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
sampling error
difference between sample statistic and population parameter
error of estimation
samples are variable
sampling distribution
represent means of samples of people
conveinent and efficient (hard to measure every person)
mean of distr. of sample means
population mean
inc size of sample
closer to population mean
standard deviation gets smaller because mean excludes outliers
central limit theorem
distribution of means is less variable then distribution of individual scores
the assertion that a distribution of sample means approaches a normal curve as sample size increases, regardless of the shape of the population from which the sample is drawn
sampling distribution
approximately normal if population = normal or n is greater than/equal to 30
sampling distribution mean = population mean
sampling distribution standard deviation < the population standard deviation
Standard Error
measuring average distance expected between sample mean and and mean
dec as sample size inc (curve gets skinnier)
Z scores
standardized raw scores
find probability of selecting sample with specific mean
Unbiased estimator
sample mean (x bar) is unbiased estimator of the mean (mew)
s2 is unbiased estimator of σ2
sample proportion is unbiased estimator of population proportion
The sample median is an unbiased estimator of the population median if the distribution of the population is symmetric.
variability
high = more error in estimation
unbiased/biased estimator
biased if it includes the population min and max (most samples don’t include this)
A sample is biased if it over represents or underrepresents some segment(s) of the population
it is said to be unbiased if the average value of an estimator equals the population parameter being estimated
Probability sample
likelihood of selection known (need to know everyone in population) → must be small
random selection (when p does not equal 1)
sampling frame known
enable an analyst to determine the probable errors that an estimator might generate
simple random sampling
people selected by chance
every possible sample of the same size n has the same probability of being selected
ex: random generator
systematic sampling
pick first person at random then go every other person for sample
set interval
cluster sampling
chose a few groups and everyone in those groups
stratified sampling
randomly select from every group
non-probability sample
likelihood of selection unknown
convenient sample used to estimate a population parameter in which no statement about the estimate's reliability can be made.
convenience/voluntary
group of people convenient to researcher
easily available
voluntary → occurs when participants volunteer to participate in a study.
snowball
start w/subset of people and have them keep collecting more people
used for data that’s hard to get
if the sample mean falls within the interval
you fail to reject Ho → not sufficient evidence
if alpha is > p
you reject the null → significant evidence
Hypothesis testing
allows us to evaluate the probability of different outcomes
procedure, based on sample evidence, that is used to test a statement or claim about a characteristic of one or more populations.
Null hypothesis significance testing
method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis about a population
Null
nothing going on
often not stated
Alternative hypothesis
something going on
stated in hypothesis
typically non-directional/two-tailed
sometimes specific
non-directional
two-tailed test
directional
one-tailed test
probability
value meant to imply “very unlikely”
unlikely to be obtained if Ho is true
Fisher’s P-value
probability of observing statistic observed if NO effect exists
strong evidence
p or alpha = 0.01
weak evidence
p or alpha = 0.2
standard
p or alpha = 0.05
test statistic
collect data → after hypotheses are stated and alpha is established
compute test statistic → Z
find probability of obtaining that test statistic
determining significance
depend partially on hypothesis (directional / non-directional)
compare p to alpha → significant (p < a) and non-significant (p > a)
compare z to critical z
significant
reject Ho
conclude Ha
restate with significant language
non-significant
fail to reject Ho
conclude Ho
restate with significant language
Find support for hypothesis
never prove
never find to be true
“fail to reject null”
never accept null
“reject null”
never accept alternative
“non-significant” / “significant”
not insignificant
“statistically significant”
does not equal practical significance
Type I error
say effect when there isn’t one
convention → p (a-level) = 0.05
false positive
reject Ho when Ho was true
Type II error
say no effect when there is one
convention → p (b-level) = 0.2
false negative
fail to reject Ho when Ho is false
Interval estimate
range that hopefully contains population parameter
dependent on confidence interval level (a)
if interval contains Ho value
no sig difference
Fail to reject Ho
if interval doesn’t contain Ho
significant difference
reject Ho
Effect size
tells how important it is
absolute magnitude of an effect (independent of n)
cohen’s d → mean difference / standard deviation
Power
ability to detect an effect
opposite of b → (1-b)
b=probability of making a type II error
depends on size of effect
large effect
more power
inc sample size
inc power
dec SD
inc power
inc alpha
dec power
T score
similar to z → bell shaped, symmetrical, mean=0
a little flatter distribution
large sample size → s approaches σ and t approaches z
t distribution
when the parameters are not known
means based on (n) and (df)
we know the population mean but not the standard deviation
variance > 1
inc n, dec error, dec variance (t)
more likely to reject Ho and find significant effect
inc variance, inc error (t)
less likely to reject Ho and find sig effect
Confidence interval
alternative to effect size
assumes sample mean should be near the mean (near → based on standard error)
inc confidence
inc interval
smaller n
larger standard error and larger interval
sampling frame
a list which identifies all members of the population.
sampling distribution of a statistic
(such as the sample mean or sample proportion)
is the probability distribution of all values of the statistic when all possible samples of size n are taken from a population.
point estimator
is a single-valued estimate calculated from the sample data, which is intended to be close to the true population value.
judgement sample
sample in which the observations are selected by an expert in the field and not picked at random.
P-value
the probability of observing a value of the test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed one
assuming the null hypothesis is true and all the assumptions related to the hypothesis test are satisfied
how does a distribution of sample means differ from a distribution of raw scores
the distribution of means has a smaller standard deviation
standard deviation of a sampling distribution
standard error
predicts that there is no effect for our manipulation/no difference between groups
null hypothesis
Independent samples
between participants design
two groups of people, different people in each group
more people needed
greater individual difference error
Independent sample t assumptions
independent observations
simple random samples
normally distributed
populations with equal variances
homogeneity variance (not tested on this math)
two samples come from population with equal variances
if violated adjust df → use a smaller df
hypotheses
Ho: mew 1 = mew 2
Ha: mew 1 (doesn’t equal/greater than/less than) mew 2
Confidence interval independent samples
if equal to zero → not significant
if it doesn’t contain zero → significant
inc variance (independent samples)
inc error
smaller t
less likely to be significant
dependent samples t
within participants (repeated measures)
two groups, same people in each, 2 scores for each person
samples are dependent on each other → fewer people needed
reduce individual difference error and variability
practice effects, manipulate salience (memorizing while drinking ex)
dependent samples t assumptions
independent observations within each condition
but full sample data is dependent
matched pairs randomly sampled from population
population distribution of differences scores (d) normal → problematic with small samples (n less than 30)
larger sample (n) → dependent samples
smaller Sd (denominator) → larger t
larger variance (sd2) → dependent samples
larger Sd (denominator) → smaller t
larger mean difference (X bar d) → dependent samples
larger numerator → larger t