RMS sem 1 part 2 '26

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/57

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:04 PM on 10/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

58 Terms

1
New cards

Operationalizing

turning a conceptual definition into a operational definition

2
New cards

How do you manage good interrater reliability with behavioral observations?

a clear codebook, that defines behavior and how to classify it to go against observer bias

3
New cards

What are the four types of

4
New cards

What is a response set and what are two types of it?

  • response set; quick shortcut in a survey

  • fence sitting; choosing a neutral stance

  • yea-saying; agreeing with everything without thinking about it


5
New cards

5 types of questions in questionaires

6
New cards

In-depth interviewing vs focus groups

  • in-depth inteviews; one-on-one, for personal topics

  • focus groups; group of informants (experts on a topic) that discuss together, less personal topics


7
New cards

Conceptual definition vs operational definition

  • conceptual; theoretical definition of a construct

  • operational; how the construct is measured or manipulated


8
New cards

What are the three types of research claims and what do they entail?

1) Causal; one variable causes the other (manipulated)

2) Association; if one variable changes, the other does too (measured)

3) Frequency; frequency of one variable (measured)

9
New cards

Causal vs Association claim

  • Association; measures both variables, does not require internal validity

  • Causal; manipulates one variable and manipulates the other, requires internal validity


10
New cards

What are three criteria for a causal claim?

1) Covariance, because causal claim is a suggested explanation for an association

2) Internal validity; there should be no confounds

3) Temporal presedence; cause should come before the effect

11
New cards

Which research is used for every one of the three research claim types?

1) Association; correlational research

2) Causal; experimental research

3) Frequency; observational research (or survey’s)

12
New cards

What are the four types of validity and what do they entail?

1) Statistical; does the data back up the statistical conclusion?

2) Internal; are there no confounds?

3) External; can the effect be generalized to the population?

4) Construct; is this the right way to measure/manipulate the construct?

13
New cards

What are the three aspects of the statistical validity of an estimated effect?

1) strength

2) precision

3) replication

14
New cards

How does a manipulated variable help a study achieve temporal precedence and internal validity?

  • internal validity; is there a confound?

  • temporal precedence; cause comes before effect

  • a manipulated variable ís the cause that comes before the effect and together with random assignment it controls for alternative explanations


15
New cards

What is temporal precedence and how do you achieve it?

  • temporal precedence; cause comes before effect

  • by manipulating a variable and measuring the effect


16
New cards
17
New cards

How do you improve the construct validity of a poll or survey?

18
New cards

How do you improve the construct validity of making observations?

19
New cards

Semantic diferrential format

20
New cards

What are the three types of questions in a survey or poll?

1) double-barreled; asks 2 questions in one

2) leading; encourages a certain response more than others

3) negatively worded; phrased negatively in a confusing way (e.g. double negative)


21
New cards

Acquiescence

yea-saying, agreeing with everything on a survey as a quick shortcut (=response set)

22
New cards

Faking good vs faking bad in answering a survey

  • faking good; choosing a socially acceptable answer to avoid controversy

  • faking bad; choosing an answer that make one look worse than they are (e.g. to get sympathy points)


23
New cards

What are the four types of answer formats in a survey or poll?

1) Open-ended; free to answer whatever

2) Forced-choice; having to pick between two or more answers

3) Likert; choosing on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree

4) Semantic differential format; choosing on a scale from contrasting adjectives



24
New cards

Masked design

observers are unaware of the study purposes to reduce bias (e.g. double blind study)

25
New cards

What is the difference between observer bias, observer effect and reactivity?

  • observer bias; interpretation of behavior is influenced by expectations

  • observer effect; participants behavior is influenced to match expectations by observer

  • reactivity; participants behavior is influenced because they are being watched


26
New cards

What are two types of observation than can reduce reactivity?

  • unobtrusive; being hidden (e.g. one-way mirror)

  • participant; living among participants (with consent)


27
New cards

What are two solutions for observer bias and observer effect?

  • masked design

  • using multiple observers


28
New cards
29
New cards

Why is external validity essential for most frequency claims?

30
New cards

What are some sampling techniques that allow for a representative sample?

31
New cards

What are the two types of samples?

  • biased; not generalizable to population

  • representative; each member of the population has an equal chance of being in the sample


32
New cards

Propability vs non-probability sampling methods

  • Probability; participants are picked at random (representative sample)

  • Non-probability; participants are not picked at random (biased sample)


33
New cards

When is external validity a priority and when not?

34
New cards

Census

Testing everyone in a population

35
New cards

What are the 6 different types of probability sampling?

1) simple random; sample is chosen completely at random from the population

2) stratified random; identifying particular demographic categories and then randomly selecting individuals of each category

3) cluster; clusters of participants in the population are selected at random, followed by data collection of everyone in a cluster

4) systematic; counting off every Nth member of a population to achieve a sample

5) multistage; a random sample of clusters followed by a random sample of people within the selected clusters

6) oversampling; identifying particular demographic categories and then intentionally randomly overrepresenting one or more categories

36
New cards

Self-selection

a form of sampling bias that occurs when a sample contains only people who volunteer to participate

37
New cards

What are the different types of non-probability sampling?

1) purposive; only certain kinds of people are included in a sample

2) convenience; choosing a sample based on those who are easiest to access

3) snowball; participants are asked to recommend acquaintances for the study

4) quota; identifying particular demographic categories, setting a target number for each category and non-randomly sampling until the quota is full

38
New cards

When might researchers decide to use a non-probability sample, and when is a probability sample more important?

  • Non-probability can be used; association claims, causal claims (internal validity more important than external validity)

  • Probability absolutely necessary; frequency claims (external validity important)



39
New cards

Inferential bias

40
New cards

When will a larger sample not be more externally valid than a smaller one?

A large non-probability sample (non-randomly selected) reduces sampling error, not bias. A small probability sample (randomly selected) has higher external validity.

41
New cards

Difference between manipulated and independent variable

indepedent variable can be measured in a correlational study, but is always manipulated in an experimental study

42
New cards

What is the difference between a control group vs a comparison group?

  • comparison group; independent variable level that differs from treatment group

  • control group; independent variable level that represents a neutral condition

  • Control group can be a comparison group, but not every comparison group is a control group


43
New cards

Matched groups

participants who are similar on some measured variable are grouped into sets; the members of each matched set are then randomly assigned to different conditions

44
New cards

What is a control variable and why is it used?

  • control variable; variable that stays constant across conditions to improve internal validity (no confounds) (e.g. same testing room)


45
New cards

Independent-Groups vs Within-Groups Designs

  • independent groups; both get different levels of an independent variable (e.g. 4 or 8 hours of sleep)

  • within groups; both get all the levels of an independent variable (4 ánd 8 hours of sleep)


46
New cards

What are the two types of Indepedent-Groups designs?

  • posttest-only design; dependent variable is measured only once (after manipulation of independent variable) (e.g. 2 groups drink Pepsi ór Coca Cola and rate the taste)

  • pretest/posttest design; dependent variable is measured twice (before and after manipulation of independent variable) (e.g. 2 groups drink Pepsi ór Coca Cola and rate their thirst before and after)


47
New cards
48
New cards

In what case might a posttest-only design be better than a pretest/posttest design?

if the pretest makes the participants suspicious or changes their behavior

49
New cards

What are the two types of Within-Groups designs?

  • concurrent measures; dependent variable is measured once, after exposure to all the levels of the independent variable at the same time (e.g. everyone drinks Coca Cola ánd Pepsi and chooses the best one)

  • repeated measures; dependent variable is measured more than once, after exposure to each level of the independent variable (e.g. everyone drinks Coca Cola ánd Pepsi and rates the tastes)


50
New cards

What are the three potential threats to internal validity in an experiment?

1) design confound; the way a study is designed (manipulated) accidentally creates a confound

2) selection effect; big differences between groups

3) order effect;

51
New cards

When can individual differences be a confound in a study?

if individual differences are distributed unevenly (= systematic variablity) between groups

52
New cards

How do experimenters avoid the three threats to internal validity in an experiment?

1) design confound; experimental control variable

2) selection effect; random assignment and matched groups

3) order effect;

53
New cards

Systematic vs unsystematic variability

  • systematic; individual differences are distributed unevenly among groups

  • unsystematic; individual differences are distributed evenly among groups


54
New cards

Why might a within-groups design be better than an independent-groups design?

  • participants are the same in both conditions, so the difference in conditions can only be attributed to the independent variable

  • it requires fewer participants than an independent-groups design


<ul><li><p>participants are the same in both conditions, so the difference in conditions can only be attributed to the independent variable</p></li><li><p>it requires fewer participants than an independent-groups design</p></li></ul><p></p>
55
New cards

Validity

the appropriateness of a conclusion or decision

56
New cards

What are the three types of order effects?

57
New cards

What are the two types of counterbalancing?

58
New cards

Pilot study