1/129
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
basic research
contribues to theory
applied research
if a theory is applicable to solve real world problems
experimental replication
experiment is reliable
parsimony/occam’s razor/KISS
findings should be explained and interpreted in simple and most economical way
true experiment
ideal format is comparative to others
research has control in a lab or controlled setting
group of subjects not being manipulated or experimented on
control group & experimental groupd
control group
people who do not receive the IV
experimental group
group who does receive the IV
confounding variable
impacts both IV and DV
independent variable
experimenter manipulates
experimental varaible
individual with __ looks like they are receiving experimental treatment
dependent variable
the outcome data that is being measured in the experiment
some form of human response
sample bias
uses concept of random sampling + random assignment
random sampling
every member of population has an equal change of being selected for the study
random assignment
randomly assign to experimental or control group
quasi-experimental research
study in which subjects are not randomly assigned to treatment group or control group
stratified sample
persons from subgroups
proportional stratified sampling
sample mimics population
cluster sampling
select sample from naturally existing group and then randomly select from existing cluster
systematic sample
Nth sampling
probability technique
first person is picked randomly and then regular intervals (10th, 15th, etc)
common in homogeneous populations
representativeness is
critical and important to research
nonprobablity sample
subjects selected by methods not based in probability theory
judgment sample
convenience sample
quota sample
judgement sample
judgement of the research to choose subjects that are thought to be representative of population
convenience sample
intact existing group used with no random sampling
quota sample
subjects have pre-specified characteristics so that the sample will mimic the same type of characteristics that is assumed to exist in general population by being studied
hypothesis
researcher’s hunch/idea
null hypothesis
experimental hypothesis
modern form
null hypothesis
no difference between control group and experimental group
experimental hypothesis (HI)
alternative hypothesis
modern form of hypothesis
written in present tense without “significant and without any mention of measurements”
test of significance
used to determine relevance between control and experimental
operates on principle of probability (p)
significant difference
significant difference
p ≤ .05
probability is less than 5% that differences occurs by chance
the smaller the p
the more convincing the experiment
level of significance is set at
.05 = confidence level = alpha level
statistical power
likelihood that a statistical hypothesis test will find a real/true effect if it exists
greater the power, the more confidence you have regarding the validity of the research
error
there is still a chance or a probability that the results were caused by chance factors
type I & type II
type I error
reject null when it is true
i.e: conclude that REBT helps lower the amount spent on gambling when it did not
type II error
accept null when it is false
i.e: conclude that REBT didn’t help the persons who are gambling too much, money at all when indeed it was helpful
probability of making a type I error
equal to the level of significance
p value is .05 then .05 is the probability of making this error
p value exceeds .05
accept the null hypothesis
extraneous variable
also known as errors
internal and external validity
internal validity
attempts to answer the question “does the experiment really, truly demonstrate that the DV changes or lack of them were caused by the IV? does the experimental condition or treatment make a difference?”
external validity
attempts to answer the question can this be generalized to other groups of people or other programs
threats to internal validity
occurs when the researcher cannot control procedures that impact the experiment
maturation, instrumental, statistical regression, selection of groups, intact groups (groups not being the same at the beginning of the study)
attrition/experimental morality
demoralized or experiencing rivalry
instrumentation threat
threat to internal validity
in or measurement methods or observer’s judgement changes impact the experiment
maturation threat
threat to internal validity
implies that time, rather than the IV, impacts the results (becoming older, a person maturing; subjects/clients becoming too fatigued to benefit from treatment)
single group time-series design can control this threat
statistical regression to the mean
occurs when extreme scores regress towards the mean or the arithmetic average when a task or test is readministered
longitudinal study/research/trend studies
a study that goes on for a long time
developmental research
following the same group of people over a period of time
attrition or experimental morality
threat to internal validity
one group loses more people than another or the final group is not like the original group because people dropped out
demoralized or experiencing rivalry
threat to internal validity
control finds out the treatment group is receiving treatment
true benefits are being hidden
reactive effect
threat to external validity
person performs better because individual is being observed
hawthorne effect
environmental setting
threat to external validity
laboratory is not the same as the real world
a study cannot have good external validity
unless it has good internal validity. however good internal validity will not guarantee good external validity
t-test/student t-test
tests a hypothesis between two normally distributed samples
appropriate for studies using 30 subjects or more
dependent or correlated t-test
same group is measured on two occasions using a pre- and a post-test
independent sample or uncorrelated t-test
two separate groups are measured on the same/one single occasion and compared to each other
ANOVA
compare more than two groups
analysis of variance
used when different levels of IV are used
expressed using F value
MANOVA
used when more than one DV is used
multivariate analysis of variance
ANCOVA
analysis of covariance
used to adjust the groups so that a variable that might correlate with the DV will not throw off the study
remove difference caused by extraneous variable
extraneous variable
any factor outside of the independent variable that can unintentionally affect the DV
correlational research
does a relationship between two variables exist
If so, what’s the magnitude and direction of the relationship
pearson product moment correlation
expressed by r
can go from -1.00 to 0 to +1.00
perfect correlations
-1 and +1
positive correlation/association
between two variables as one grows up and so does the other
negative correlation
indicated when one variable goes up while another goes down
inverse correlations/relationships
zero correlation
signifies no relationship
correlation does not imply
causation; does not imply cause and effect
the higher the number
the stronger the correlation
normal/true bell shaped
gaussian curve
normal distribution
curve where the mean, median & mode all fall in the middle of the curve
mean, median, and mode are the same value
measures of central tendency
mean, median and mode
mode
most frequently occurring score or category
always going to be at the top or the high point of the graph for the distribution
positively skew
the mode (most frequently occurring score, and the median (the middle score) are lower than the mean (average of all scores)
curve tail goes to the right
bimodal curve
two high points
has two maximum areas of concentration
multimodal curves
distributions have more than two modes
median
cuts distribution in half if you rank order the scores from the highest to lowest
exact middle of distribution or 50th percentile
mean
most useful measures of central tendency
add up scores and divide the total by the number of scores
skewed distribution
extreme values and curves lean to one side or other if you draw it
media is the statistic of choice to not be impacted by extremes
negatively skewed
curved tail goes to the left
mode and median are higher than mean
frequency polygon
drawing a curve of scores
y-axis
vertical line to left of the curve
ordinant
DVs are placed here
x-axis
abscissa
IVs are placed here
histogram
continuous numerical data
standard deviation (SD)
square root of variance
spread of scores
variance
measure of dispersion of scores
what percentage of cases fall within ±1 SD of the mean?
68.25%
what percentage of cases fall within ±2 SD of the mean?
95.4%
what percentage of cases fall within ±3 SD of the mean?
99.74%
z scores
a way to analyze formal, normal distribution
same as SD
2.5 = 2.5 SD above the mean
-2.5 = 2.5 SD below the mean
T score
tells you how many SD a sample mean is away from the population mean when the population SD is unknown
mean is 50, with every 10 points landing at SD above or below
one SD above mean = 60
one SD below mean = 40
T scores simplify things by
eliminating negative numbers that can appear when you use z-scores
stanines scores
standard nine scores
divide the distribution into nine equal intervals with a mean of five and a standard deviation of two
lowest ninth of the distribution to the highest
descriptive statistics
averages (mean, median, mode); range, vaiance, sd and any other statistical device
not experimental
nominal scale
uses numbers to identify or classify
qualitative
weak scale only used for identification
ordinal scale
described variables that can be rank ordered
likert scales
categorized as ordinal and interval
interval scale
numbers scaled at equal distances, but there is no real zero point
ratio scale
true absolute zero point
highest form of measurement
i.e: Kelvin temperature scale
survey
simplest approach to research
conducted by giving a questionnaire or a so-called poll to a sample population
return rate of 30-50% is typical
ethnographic research
looks at overll dynamics in cultural or situation
holistic, inductive, qualitative
observational research and case studies
qualitative
information, research or analysis focused on the characteristics, meanings, and descriptive qualities of a subject rather than its numerical measurement or quantity
core characteristics: non-numerical, context-specific, inductive
i.e.: in-depth interviews, focus groups, content analysis, case studies, ethnography
quantitative
refers to information, research or data that is measured, counted or expressed in numbers and statistics
core characteristics: numerical format, objective focus, large sample size, measurable variables, deductive, replicable design
i.e.: surveys & questionnaires, experiments, statistical analysis
inductive reasoning
process where you generalize based on specific observations
deductive reasoning
top down process
specific hypothesis or hypotheses are derived from general principles