1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Main idea
Teorell measures democracy using a numerical scale, then examines how countries' democracy scores change over time
Teorell numerical democracy index
Teorell combines established democracy indicators from Freedom House and Polity to construct a democracy measure on a 0–10 scale
0 = fully authoritarian
10 = fully democratic
Scores between 0 and 10 indicate different degrees of democracy
Four ways Teorell analyzes democracy
1) general democratization
2) upturns
3) downturns
4) long-run
general democratization
Overall changes in a country's level of democracy, considering both improvements and declines
upturns
Increases in democracy scores — movement toward democracy
downturns
Decreases in democracy scores — movement toward authoritarianism
long-run
The longer-term effect of a determinant on a country's democracy level
Why does Teorell distinguish them?
A factor that encourages democratization might not prevent democratic breakdown
This distinction allows him to determine whether a factor helps countries become more democratic, helps prevent democratic decline, or affects their long-term level of democracy