1/74
Looks like no tags are added yet.
bike friendly community characteristics
bike lanes/trails/shoulders, driver behavior/awareness, community support
does advocacy work?
does not have a strong correlation to biking/walking more
bike friendly = healthier or unhealthier
healthier
types of riders
strong and fearless, enthused and confident, interested but concerned
strong and fearless rider
highly confident, comfortable riding w/ vehicle traffic w/ no bike lanes
enthused and confident rider
prefer protected but will go on unprotected if needed
interested but concerned riders
ride only in calm areas
how much of the US are interested but concerned riders
more than ½ US population
top cyclist complaint
incomplete streets (too few bikeways)
europe has more or less bike-ped travel
more: Netherlands=bike and Germany=walk
Europe has more or less deaths
way less deaths
Biking vs fatality rates
more biking = less fatality
bikes and transit
supports longer trips, economical, first and last mile issues
bike short term parking
shoppers, diners and visitors; people will look for closest and most convenient parking
prioritize visibility and proximity
biking long term parking
employess, tenants; security and shelter important
good bike parking qualities
support bike in 2 spots, lock frame and 1 wheel, securely anchored to ground, resistant to damage, slots for all bike types
sharrow
a pavement road marking consisting of a bicycle symbol paired with two chevron arrows above it
Chicago bike lanes installed
bike lanes more effective than sharrows, decrease in injuries
no infrastructure almost as effective as sharrows or more
less injuries than with sharrows, sharrows slightly larger increase in commuting
types of protection
jersey barriers, parking spots, plantar boxes, bollards, flex posts, parked cars
2 way protected
type of bike lane
contraflow bike lane
converts a one-way traffic street into a two-way traffic street (one direction = motor vehicles and bikes, other direction = bikes only)
buffered bike lane
painted lines (no physical barrier)
shared-use path or trail (safest, more expensive, more space)
for pedestrians and cyclists; separated from motorized traffic by open space or barrier
conventional bike lane
marginally safer than nothing, risks from many directions
bike friendly city example
Davis, CA (20-25% trips made by bicycle)
environment barriers to PA for children
Decreased opportunities for PA at and after school
Reduced walking to and from school
Urban design that discourages PA and walking
Competition for leisure time with sedentary activities
children trends
decrease in walking/biking to school
most consistent correlates of PA
land use mix, residential desnity; access to green spaces; cycling infrastructure
Active transportation to school
major decline in students walking or biking to school, increase in car transport
correlates of active commuting
neg: no lights/crossings, busy road barrier, steep hill, distance
pos: good connectivity, less than ½ mile
new trend: school streets
a road outside a school with a temporary restriction on motorized traffic at school drop-off and pick-up times; safer and healthier
traffic gardens/playgrounds
small-scale parks laid out like streetscapes
older adult trends
decrease in travel via private vehicles and increase in public transit; walking = second most common
age walk/bike trends
16-24 most likely to walk
are older adults more likely to walk or bike
walk
Older adult active travel trends (biking)
contributed to surge in bike participation (55 and older trips have trippled)
Declining health associated with aging is a factor associated with
less active travel
The neighborhood physical environment and active travel in older adults
Positive associations: residential density/urbanization, walkability, street connectivity, land-use mix
negative associations: Littering/vandalism/decay
Active Aging
promotes the vision of all individuals
poverty in USA
11.5%
Active Travel Participation- Race/Ethnicity
Asian alone (walk)
hispanic/latino (bike)
race with most fatalities in walking/biking
NH white
Income trends w/ walk/bike
walk/bike most = <$10,000
walk/bike least = $100,000-$199,000
fatality rates
people die while walking at much higher rates in lower-income communities (3-36K)
active travel participation - residential location
city = highest walking/biking
outside metro = lowest walking/biking
PA environment in low income neighborhoods
Crime, traffic, and unsafe playground equipment
Less likely to participate in organized sports
less time being active during PE classes and are less likely to have recess
what can we measure
transportation variables, neighborhood type, accessibility
transportation variables
% of network that is a grid
Street density
Presence of sidewalks or bike paths
Average sidewalk width
Neighborhood Type
Traditional vs. suburban
Pedestrian oriented vs. auto oriented
Accessibility
Access
Convenience to facilities
PA related opportunities
Places to exercise or walk
Walkscore
measures the walkability of any address using a patented system (distance to amenities)
how do we measure
surveys, audits, objective methods
Challenges & Limitations in this Area
Perceptions don’t always equal reality
Very complex
Hard to analyze the data
community
group of people with shared values and institutions; geographically defined, share informal social norms
community based approaches
target larger population, mass media, work with entire community
components of community based approaches
cater to dif ability levels, provide social support, educate and inform
appeals of community interventions
won’t have to think about it
drawbacks of community interventions
cost and complexity
increasing PA: community wide campaigns
recommended
increasing PA: stand alone mass media campaigns
insufficient evidence
increasing PA: mass media and health related
recommended
increasing PA: classroom education
not recommended
social marketing
program planning process promoting the voluntary behavior of the target audience
the 4 P’s
product, price, place and promotion
NFL play 60
encourage kids to be active 60 mins a day; reverse obesity
verb (9-13) (it’s what you do)- phase 1
get people aware of campaign
verb (9-13) (it’s what you do)- phase 2
focus on increasing opportunities and access
verb effectiveness- 1 year
74% aware of campaign and PA increased
verb effectiveness- 2 years
PA increased, those aware of campaign had more PA than those unaware, positive social influences
small steps
healthy is not impossible if you take one small step at a time; used humor
everyday choices
Targets African-American women, who, as a group, are at particularly high risk for those diseases related to lifestyle
move your way
CDC developed Toolkit for dissemination- basic information on PA
this girl can
women in UK, celebrate active women
Targeting Influencers: Moving Medicine
UK for Primary Care providers; more comfortable with prescribing PA to their patients