Module 2: Moral Reasoning

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/22

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Chapter 2: Moral Reasoning

Last updated 10:49 PM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

23 Terms

1
New cards

Moral Reasoning

A set of reasons and a conclusion that these reasons are meant to support

2
New cards

Argument

A set of reasons and a conclusion

3
New cards

Logical Validity

The feature of an argument that guarantees the truth of its conclusion, on the assumption that its premises are true

4
New cards

Sound Arguments

a valid argument with true premises

5
New cards

3 part test to separate a valid argument from an invalid one

  1. Identify all of an arguments premises

  2. Imagine all of them are true

  3. Then ask yourself: supporting that all of the premises are true, could they conclusion be false?


6
New cards

Sound arguments contain only

true premises

7
New cards

Arguments are valid or invalid, sound or unsound, NOT

true or false

8
New cards

Sufficient Condition

to guarantee (being human is a sufficient condition of being mammal)

9
New cards

Necessary Condition

requirements (having $ is a necessary condition of being a millionaire)

10
New cards

Biconditional

a claim that supplies a condition that is both necessary and sufficient for something

11
New cards

Modus Ponens

  1. P → Q

  2. P

  3. ∴ Q


12
New cards

Modus Tollens

  1. P → Q

  2. ⊥ Q

  3. ∴ ⊥ P


13
New cards

Hypothetical Syllogism

  1. P → Q

  2. Q → R

  3. ∴ P → R


14
New cards

Fallacy

a mistake in reasoning

15
New cards

formal fallacy

a kind of argument all of whose instances are logically invalid

16
New cards

fallacy of denying the antecedent

  1. P → Q

  2. ⊥ P

  3. ∴ ⊥ Q


17
New cards

fallacy of confirming the consequent

  1. P → Q

  2. Q is True

  3. P is True


18
New cards

Ad Hominem Fallacy

Occurs when you try to undermine a position by attacking the person who is advancing it.

19
New cards

Appeal to irrelevant emotions

Someone tries to convince you of a claim by playing on your emotions.

20
New cards

Appeal to authority

Relying on authority figures to substantiate a position outside their area of expertise.

21
New cards

Straw Man Fallacy

Depicts an opponents position in a way that makes it easy to refute, thereby diverting attentions from the real position being advanced.

22
New cards

Appeal to Ignorance

  1. When one thinks a claim is true because it hasn't been proven false

  2. When one thinks a claim is false because it hasn't been proven true


23
New cards

Hasty Generalizations

Occurs when someone illicitly draws a general lesson from only a small handful of cases